The Conversation Says Email Signatures Are Bad For Global Boil

This is hilarious

It is a real article, and, having read their stuff for years, I’m not surprised

Sending emails is an everyday activity, but it comes with an environmental cost. Emails use energy, and that energy often comes from burning fossil fuels, which in turn, contribute to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

Um, what’s the carbon footprint on publishing a climamoonbat article online so that people can read it, which uses energy? Heck, The Conversation should just shut down if they want to Save The Planet.

The results showed that in Canada, where about 15 per cent of people include gender pronouns in emails, the resulting carbon emissions from this small change (three extra words) may contribute to the premature deaths of one person a year, according to the 1,000-ton rule.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

2 Responses to “The Conversation Says Email Signatures Are Bad For Global Boil”

  1. Dana says:

    While including ‘gender pronouns “may contribute to the premature deaths of one person a year, according to the 1,000-ton rule,” they contribute to the increasing insanity of the modern world by a far, far, far greater amount.

    As a man with what is more commonly a woman’s name, it could at least be argued that including my ‘pronouns’ would help me, but over the years I have learned to live with it without taking offense.

    • Professor Hale says:

      Not to mention that including pronouns in email signatures is a red flag for insanity and is highly likely to result in people discriminating against you in job hiring. This you will need to live in your parent’s basement, troll the internet, become angrier and angrier and increase your risk of suicide or stroke.

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove