SCOTUS Rules In Trump’s Favor On Keeping The Venezuelan Repatriation Flights Going

At least temporarily

Supreme Court grants Trump request to lift stay halting Venezuelan deportations

The Supreme Court on Monday granted President Donald Trump’s request to vacate a lower court’s ruling barring the administration from using a 1798 wartime immigration law to immediately deport Venezuelan nationals – including alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang – from the U.S., marking a significant victory for the administration as it advances key immigration priorities.

Justices on the high court ruled 5-4 to grant the administration’s request to lift the stay, in a temporary victory for Trump and his allies.

At issue was the Alien Enemies Act, or the immigration law passed by Congress in 1789 to immediately remove certain migrants from U.S. soil.

Lawyers for the Trump administration had urged the court to vacate the lower court ruling, arguing in a Supreme Court filing that the lower court orders “rebuffed” their immigration agenda, including their ability “to protect the Nation against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations.”

Well, that’s good an all in a nutshell, but, let’s go to MSNBC, if you can believe it, because, did you notice the 5-4 decision?

A divided Supreme Court vacated temporary restraining orders issued by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., which had halted certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. The court split 5-4, with Republican appointees in the majority and Trump appointee Amy Coney Barrett dissenting alongside the court’s three Democratic appointees.

I hate to say she has become a disappointment, because I appreciate when Judges follow the Constitution and the law, but, she sure seems to be voting with the liberals quite a bit on big cases, eh?

In an unsigned “per curiam” ruling, the majority said detainees must bring their challenges in habeas corpus proceedings and must do so where they are confined. “The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia,” the majority said.

The majority also said detainees under the act “must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.”

The Trump admin should have an immigration judge on hand to adjudicate before they are packed on planes and shipped out.

Writing a dissent joined by the other two Democratic appointees and partially by Barrett, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the majority’s legal conclusion “suspect.” She said the court granted the government “extraordinary relief” and said the court did so “without mention of the grave harm Plaintiffs will face if they are erroneously removed to El Salvador or regard for the Government’s attempts to subvert the judicial process throughout this litigation.”

What of the grave harm to American citizens from murderers, rapists, child predators, and gang members?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

15 Responses to “SCOTUS Rules In Trump’s Favor On Keeping The Venezuelan Repatriation Flights Going”

  1. Dana says:

    Sonia Sotomayor wrote:

    the court granted the government “extraordinary relief” and said the court did so “without mention of the grave harm Plaintiffs will face if they are erroneously removed to El Salvador or regard for the Government’s attempts to subvert the judicial process throughout this litigation.”

    If someone is in the country completely illegally, he can be deported, period. The consequences they face in the country to which they have been deported should not be our concern.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Well, duh.

    “It is fair to read the district court’s order as one requiring that the government facilitate Abrego Garcia’s release, rather than demand it,” Reagan appointee Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III wrote. “The former seems within the trial court’s lawful powers in this circumstance; the latter would be an intrusion on core executive powers that goes too far.”

    Judge Wilkinson added that facts of the case “present the potential for a disturbing loophole: namely that the government could whisk individuals to foreign prisons in violation of court orders and then contend, invoking its Article II powers, that it is no longer their custodian, and there is nothing that can be done.” He called this a path to “perfect lawlessness.”

    For example in 2029, President Newsom could snatch a citizen from Mar-a-Lago, have him whisked away to an Atlantic Island controlled by France and claim, “He’s out of our control.”

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Another win for Trump and America yet
      Rimjob and the demlibs just can’t take the “L”.

      More whining please!

      Bwaha! Lolgfy Loser!
      MAGA47 Motherfucker!

    • Doom and Gloom says:

      Thank God. If there is nothing that can be done when a democrat is in office then the reverse should be true.

      JOE BIDEN, or more precisely BARAK OBAMA, who was president for the last 4 years, clearly violated the constitution by not following the Immigration law. No repercussions.

      Gavin Newsome? Well more likely the only hope the left has is for Fetterman to walz around in his boxer shorts and hoodie. I would consider voting for Fetterman. He is the only democrat I have seen that at least shows some semblance of sanity.

      Because if leftist freaks want to keep violent, murdering, rapist in the country under some pretext of keeping Democracy alive….then the only ones making a mockery of Democracy is them. Not Trump.

      So thank god he can now speed up the deportations of people who are threatening and killing American C I T I Z E N S to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN after 4 years 12 year of OBAMA/BIDEN did everything they could to turn it into a third world shit hole.

    • Jl says:

      Really? Or, millions of unvetted illegals could cross the border, many of them committing violent acts once here, and according to old Joe and the Democratic Party, there was nothing we could do about it..!

    • Jeffery Keene of St. Louis says:

      Now you’re even projecting your TDS into the future? And what’s even funnier you’re projecting that greasy skinny slime ball homosexual black face faggot Newsome as president? You and your whole party have gone off the deep end. And I thank you for it.

      We told you for four years all your ridiculous hatred for Donald Trump was leading you down the wrong path but you wouldn’t listen. Thank you.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Arguably, the most important human right is our right to ‘due process’!!

    This prevents a movement in power from violating the basic human rights of persons in America.

    Of what is the #47 Republicun Administration afraid? Are they afraid that basic oversight will stop their anti-Constitutional actions?

    Fifth Amendment
    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Fourteenth Amendment
    Section 1

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    We recognize today that FDRs imprisonment of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans (including even citizens) was a gross assault on human rights. And they were denied due process. And although there ere more German-Americans FDR only imprisoned some 10,000. Government agents raided the German-American Bund (pro-Nazi movement) but arrested 76 Naiz sympathizers, although there were thousands of members!

    The German-American Bund had several commandments:

    Establishing white Christian supremacy in the United States;
    Expelling Jews from labor unions and government positions;
    Ending relations with Soviet Russia and outlawing Communism in the United States;
    Stopping the flow of refugees into the United States; and
    Isolating the United States from international conflicts and world affairs.

    Nazi defendants Carl Bregler, Rudolf Markmann, Henry Hauck, Frederick William Van Den Bergh etc went to court, i.e., DUE F’ING PROCESS. If Americans were not afraid of Nazis in America then, why are we terrified of Venezuelans today??

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Guess Rimjob doesn’t remember the last 4 years and all that “due process” afforded
      Trump by the Biden administration’s political henchmen led by Merrick Garland…

      Bwaha! Lolgfy Loser!

    • fp says:

      ED: “Arguably, the most important human right is our right to ‘due process’!!”

      Jake Lang would like to think you believe in due process.

      Oh, silly me. ‘Due process’ is for illegal alien criminals, not for citizens.

      And you wonder why your precious Kamala lost the election.

  4. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    WINNING?

    The High Court gave the current Republicun Administration a 5-4 victory??

    Despite siding with the administration, the court’s majority placed limits on how deportations may occur, emphasizing that judicial review is required.

    Detainees “must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonabl e time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs,” the majority wrote.

    In other words (actually, in THE words) the current Republicun Administration must afford due process to the abducted persons. Is the Republicun admin required to bring their captives before a judge?
    The catch is that each INDIVIDUAL PERSON must obtain legal representation.

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove