Instead of making their own lives carbon neutral, they just want government in charge of doing this
Why Loss and Damage is essential for climate action in new NDCs
Anchoring losses and damages in the new round of national climate plans can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature, and must not be overlooked. (snip through meaningless cult talk)
Current national climate plans – known as Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs – are intended to be ‘roadmaps’ for addressing climate change by sharply reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building resilience. But these plans are nowhere near ambitious enough to do that. The consequences are that climate risks are increasing, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is escalating. (snip)
“Anchoring losses and damages in NDCs can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature. It can provide countries with a more comprehensive climate response, and ensure that the most vulnerable communities can be assisted,” he says.
Countries can take four simple steps to ensure that Loss and Damage is effectively reflected in their plans, says Chamling Rai.
First, countries must define loss and damage in the national context. It is important for countries to include a definition of loss and damage in their national context in their NDC.
Important to whom? A doomsday cult? Or, something more nefarious?
Second, countries must describe the specific losses and damages that are already happening. It is also recommended that projected losses and damages related to different sectors or geographies based on different greenhouse gas emission and temperature-rise scenarios be included where possible.
Third, countries must highlight ongoing initiatives being undertaken to avert, minimize and address losses and damages. These may include institutional frameworks, policies, on-the-ground implementation and financing measures. It is also an opportunity to highlight how the lack of global ambition to finance mitigation and adaptation actions exacerbates country losses and damages.
Finally, countries must include specific contributions on loss and damage.
Loss and damage is really the latest claptrap meant as a way to do two things. First, take money from the producing nations and spread it around the 3rd world shitholes. Second, none of this can all happen without massive government control of the citizens. That’s the only way it occurs. Where you go, what you eat, where you live, how you live. The government must know everything about everyone and ever company. It’s another stealth attempt at authoritarianism, which is the backbone of the climate cult.
Our distinguished host wrote:
Absotively, posilutely right! Most people want gas ranges, but people like Governess Kathy Hochul and the democratic minions in the state legislature have banned the installation of new gas ranges after 2026. Most people want gasoline-powered cars, but the Pyrite State and several of its fellow travelers are requiring increasing percentage of new vehicles sold to be zero emission, with that percentage to hit 100% in 2035. Activists are pushing hard for ‘public transportation,’ even as the vast majority of the public eschew city buses and passenger rail. Some on the left are pushing the cancellation of zoning regulations so that people can build four story apartment buildings in what are now single-family home neighborhoods, trashing the home values of the people who have their single-family homes next to such sunlight-blocking monstrosities.
You will have nothing, and you will like it!