You Charged Your Phone, Therefore, Wisconsin Is Dooooomed!

Has anyone told the Troglopundit that his state is doomed?

(The Badger Herald) Climate change might have been a controversial political issue for some time, but there isn’t much of a controversy anymore. To those who still doubt the “existence of climate change” —there was no winter in Wisconsin this year. In the words of a true climate change non-believer, Bill O’Reilly, “You can’t explain that!” The mildness of this winter didn’t just make weather a greater cause for small-talk than it normally is, but also broke every record in the weather almanac archives. If mean temperature between November and February were plotted from year to year, 2011-2012 would look like a singularity. To doubt global climate change, given the body of evidence that exists today, is to doubt inductive reasoning —which is the foundation for empirical science.

Know how the author knows? Because he wore a polar bear suit, and was sweating, so he knows exactly what a polar bear feels like. During one warm winter. After multiple cold and snowy winters. Which is certainly caused my man-induced climate change. I blame you. Because blaming natural processes and variation would simply be stupid.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

3 Responses to “You Charged Your Phone, Therefore, Wisconsin Is Dooooomed!”

  1. david7134 says:

    Notice a shift. They used to claim that the majority of scientist supported the concept. Now it is “body of evidence”. What evidence? Point to a web site that list the evidence in raw terms, not a site with articles that simply go on about how FOX TV is influencing the debate (I don’t watch FOX because everytime I see Shepard Smith, I want to hurt him, bad). The problem is that I want to hurt Shepard less than any of the other commintators on CNN, MSNBC, etc. and this is after knowing that Wolf visit my town and mutual friends assure me that he is conservative!!!

    That did it , now I have to go hurt someone.

  2. Kevin says:

    I gotta side with the alarmists on this one. As climatologists have always said, “Weather IS climate.”

    At least I think that’s what they’ve always said.

  3. Gumball_Brains says:

    If mean temperature between November and February were plotted from year to year, 2011-2012 would look like a singularity. To doubt global climate change, given the body of evidence that exists today, is to doubt inductive reasoning —which is the foundation for empirical science.

    BUWWAAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!1!!!1

    So, now empirical science takes one winter out of millions, heck I’ll give them 100, and claims that it means “CLIMATE CHAAAAAANNNGGGE-JUH”.

    Yep, We’ve gone complete full circle to now them claiming one state having a weird winter is empirically proof positive that the entire globe is … oh… wait.. he said .. “changing” didn’t he.

    Oh. He’s right. This is proof positive that our climate is ever changing. He beat us at our own game! Wow. I stand humbled and agasp’d. EMPIRICAL Proof positive that this blue marble in the vastness of interstellar universal space has a changing climate.

    I bow.

Pirate's Cove