How cute
Why Zero Carbon is the only solution to global warming and climate change
Wait, are they now two separate things?
I’ve been writing a lot about the Zero Carbon economy, one of the two methods we have of dealing with the coming economic scarcity, and the only one of those ways that provides us a solution to climate change — “global warming†(though some of that warming may produce extreme cooling, in fact a new Ice Age, in some parts of the globe).
Um, global warming can produce a new ice age? And Warmists complain when we say they’re cultists and wouldn’t know science if it reached up and smacked them?
But that information, about the coming scarcity and the argument for Zero Carbon as the solution, is part of a longer essay, and the second part of it at that. So I want to bring these ideas to the forefront, and not by just linking to them.
Which leads to an article that starts out
I’ll be plain — we can solve the energy crisis with extreme energy rationing now. We need to put the brakes on the carbon car hard and soon. That’s the only way to keep the world below the original +3°C “game over†scenario. That’s the only way to keep the world at or below the newer +2°C “life between the Ice Ages†scenario:
And they are up for forced rationing, despite the human suffering and death toll.
But first things first. If we have any shot at all at fixing this mess, we need to have our eye on the right goal. So-called “carbon neutral†is a climate-caused death sentence. Zero Carbon, on a crash agenda is the only work worth doing. As a great man once said, it doesn’t make any difference how fast you climb the ladder, if it’s the wrong ladder.
Interestingly, Warmists refuse to go carbon neutral, much less zero carbon. And notice that they want Everyone Else to pay the price for their beliefs.
“Zero carbon” Just when you think these people can’t say anything dumber…..they do.
Actually, this might be the best idea yet. If the liberals would start by not producing any offending CO2, in other words stop breathing, then our problems would be solved.
david,
Still pushing your “kill all the liberals” meme again, I see. Typical violent, frustrated reactionary.
Another way to solve problems is to work to solve problems, rather than just wishing death to those with whom you disagree.
Hmmm… let’s see….. did david advocate killing anyone in his post?
Well gee golly whilikers! He didn’t!
So that means that the liberal Jeffery lied again.
So why do liberals wish death on people?
Once again, li’l Jeffery projects his feelings and wishes on others.
Of course now, he may come back with something “witty” like “suck it” because that is the level of his discourse when he is once again shown to be a liar and a hypocrite.
By the way Jeffery, Al Gore and you are still hypocrites in the AGW debate and your unwillingness of you, Gore and people of your ilk to change your lifestyle shows that your talk about AGW is bluster and that you don’t actually believe what you type.
Actions speak louder than words Jeffery.
And yet none of those people post here… david did. I disagree with their wishing harm on others the same way I disagree with david wishing death on those with whom he disagrees.
I assume you must agree with david in wishing death on those with whom you disagree.
I can only imagine the frustration that reactionaries must feel when debating – but death threats are over the top.
If he had done that, I would agree with you. But he didn’t so all you are doing is either lying (again) or demonstrating a continuing lack of reading comprehension skills. Which on is it?
I can only imagine the frustration that reactionaries must feel when debating – but death threats are over the top.
I can only imagine what it is like living your delusional life where you project your desires on others; where you lie; where you cannot read or comprehend what it said.
I don’t make death threats on anyone Jeffery. On that we can agree. However that was not what was said, so another strawman you created comes back and kicks you in the butt.
Again.
And in case you forgot Jeffery, Al Gore and you are still hypocrites in the AGW debate and your unwillingness of you, Gore and people of your ilk to change your lifestyle shows that your talk about AGW is bluster and that you don’t actually believe what you type.
Actions speak louder than words Jeffery.