I was planning on ignoring the idiocy on Twitter linking Patricia with ‘climate change’, which are runnign rampant (not as much as used to happen, though), but, then I go bored waiting for an appointment, checked Drudge, and saw this
Mexican plea for climate consensus as hurricane nears
Mexico’s climate negotiator issued a tearful plea Friday to UN colleagues to put aside their differences for a global pact, as a superhurricane headed for his country.
“In about four hours, Hurricane Patricia will hit the Mexican coast,” Roberto Dondisch said at the closing session of a fraught round of negotiations in Bonn. “I don’t think I need to say more about the urgency to get this deal done.”
“I ask you all to put aside your differences so together we can start working.”
Dondisch made the plea on the final session of a five-day effort to advance towards a post-2020 UN pact to tame greenhouse gases.
These people are pretty much ghouls, attempting to use a natural even to push their far left fascist/redistributive/taxation agenda. But, here’s where it gets really interesting
Patricia’s track looks pretty bad, eh? Those reds are category 5 status. Oh, wait, no that’s not Patricia’s track at all
That’s Patricia. The first picture is for the 1959 Mexico hurricane, which, interestingly, formed on October 23rd (well, first noticed, this being 1959 and no satellites), and dissipated on the 29th. It was the strongest eastern Pacific landfalling hurricane to date, and Patricia may not beat it. It was also the deadliest, killing 1800 (at least). It had the highest windspeeds, measured up to 160mph.
And all this occurred when CO2 was below the “safe” level of 350ppm, being around 315ppm. Also, interestingly, this occurred during a time when the world was experiencing a Pause/slight cooling. Nothing should be totally implied from all this, except to say that this has happened before, it can and will happen again, and to link it to Someone Else driving a fossil fueled vehicle is stupid, dogmatic, cultish, and un-scientific.
PS: It’s funny, Warmists tell us that no particular storm or cold winter are proof against AGW, and some will say that no particular storm is proof of AGW, yet, they immediately link every storm and weather event to AGW.
This is a “natural” event? As opposed to what? A supernatural event?
I consider man to be a part of nature, not a supernatural being. With a soul that never dies
It’s your cult that basically try’s to blame any climate event on causes other than natural, so blame your cult leaders.
If those idiots had not used fossil fuel to travel all around the world instead of doing online meetings, that hurricane would have never formed.