That thud you just heard was the anti-gun Liberals losing their narrative
(CNN) Â Investigators think that as the San Bernardino, California, massacre was happening, female shooter Tashfeen Malik posted a pledge of allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook, three U.S. officials familiar with the investigation told CNN.
Malik’s post was made on an account with a different name, one U.S. official said. The officials did not explain how they knew Malik made the post.
A law enforcement official said it appeared that Wednesday’s mass shooting — which left 14 people dead and 21 wounded before the two attackers, Malik and her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, were killed in a shootout with police — may have been inspired by ISIS.
I wonder if Obama will still tell us that ISIS is a JV team and is “contained”? Perhaps he and the Left can tell us that ‘climate change’ is more dangerous? Or that the Paris Hotcoldwetdry meeting is a “rebuke” to ISIS? At what point will Lefties allow their narrow beliefs to come to terms with radical Islam being a danger? For goodness sake, one would think that Progressives would realize that hardcore Islam is in direct competition in the goal for global dominance?
Meanwhile, has someone told Salon?
The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns https://t.co/jpg4kIiaoP pic.twitter.com/F6CGjMM6Wc
— Salon (@Salon) December 4, 2015
From the link
The mass shootings that plague us, and the daily individual acts of gun violence and death should, however, lead us to make access to guns more difficult. We should, that is, seek to “control†access to them and their use. But even that’s not going far enough. We should get rid of them, that is, ban them. Guns create too many problems, promote too much fear, and lead to too many deaths to not consider banning them. Perhaps they were necessary at some point in our history, but let’s declare that that time has run its course.
They’re just saying what the Far Left really thinks, but won’t say for fear of alienating the American voter.
Notice that Obama and the Dems are more interested in limiting our freedom than attacking those that have violated our country. They now say that hateful references to Islam will be prosecuted, yet they refuse to profile or database this group despite the fact that they are the number one terror organization for the last 60 years. We are haunted by the fact that the Nazis did this to the Jews, yet the fact is the actions of the Nazis would have been perfectly fine if the Jews were terrorist or killing others as the Muslims are inclined to do. Hitler just picked the wrong people to isolate. Then the liberals have doubled down on the stupidity of limiting gun rights at a time when people are feeling most vulnerable. Though this action is likely a distraction to make us look elsewhere at a time when Obama’s leadership and policies are falling apart. I am not particularly religious, but it seems that the government is also trying to limit Christians and expand the influence of Islam. Even when our great government was trying to force me to Vietnam and thus certain death have I felt as exposed and threatened by the very people that should be protecting us. We could say that supporting the alternative political party would be the way to go, but at the end of the day, there is no difference between to two and all the rhetoric seems to be nothing more than efforts to get more donations. At the same time, I see our medical system falling apart due to efforts from DC and the financial situation is coming to a head as a recession is developing, or rather worsening of the economy in the depression we are in.
So, after considerable bitching, what should we do? Can’t do a thing except wait for the coming war.
[…] California shooter Malik lived in Saudi Arabia for years During Shooting Rampage, Tashfeen Malik Pledged Allegiance To ISIS Leader California shooting: Massacre shooter may be linked to Islamic State My News: White House taking a […]
Well Teach crttainly the varsity Alqaeda has killed far more Americans than ISIS wouldn’t you agree?
Teach should Farook have been allowed to buy such powerful weapons as he used to kill so many human beings?
Are you now fighting for his right to buy those guns?
Teach should Farook have been allowed to buy such powerful weapons as he used to kill so many human beings?
Get your facts straight, retard.
He didn’t buy them.
Also, the guns were illegally altered.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2015/12/4/atf-says-weapons-used-in-san-bernardino-shooting-were-illegal-in-california
???? drowningpuppies?? Did you read the post you cited ? it clearly says “But not so fast. It may be true that these guns were purchased legally, but they were not used legally and in fact, they were modified in violation of the California firearms laws, says the ATF.”
That sure sounds to me like he bought them.
It sure sounds to me like you are saying that jihadis or pretty much anyone else should be able to purchase pretty much any weapon they want.
Do you think he should have been able to purchase these weapons?
Hey, retard!!!
The rifles used in the assault were not purchased by Farook. Should I repeat that or do you know something different than what was reported by the ATF?
It doesn’t matter how it sounds.