…is a more carbon friendly mode of transportation, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on the media slamming Clint Eastwood for not portray violent Islamsts sympathetically.
It’s shorts week!
…is a more carbon friendly mode of transportation, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on the media slamming Clint Eastwood for not portray violent Islamsts sympathetically.
It’s shorts week!
A group of teenagers from Florida continues to humiliate tRump/NRA daily.
Last week they were eating Tide Pods, this week they’re your wise sages that need to be heeded…
There’s a Dem plan to impeach Justice Clarence Thomas as credible new claims of sexual assault have emerged. Of course, they’ll need the House and Senate and finally a Dem Prez to nominate a decent and fair American.
For whatever reason, at the time the “gentlemans” Congress didn’t want to hear from the other women who worked for or with Thomas who corroborated Ms. Hill’s claims – Angela Wright, Rose Jourdain, Lillian McEwen, Sukari Hardnett, Kaye Savage, Moira Smith… The last thing Ted Kennedy wanted to talk about was sexual abuse. Clearly, Thomas committed perjury during the hearings. Joe Biden, Chairman of the hearings, was outwitted by the Repubs, agreeing to limits on the line of questioning at the time. The Repubs attacked Anita Hill at the time with the catchphrase “a little bit nutty, a little bit slutty”. Classic Con Man! t-Rump would have been proud if he wasn’t busy raping 13 yr olds.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/the-case-for-impeaching-clarence-thomas.html?utm_campaign=nym&utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s1
Laughable. Even if we were to believe Miss Hill’s claims, what she alleged was that Mr Thomas made a few crude comments to her. That ain’t sexual assault.
It would take a majority of the House of Representatives, which is controlled by the House of Representatives, to impeach Justice Thomas, and 67 senators to remove him from office. With only ten Republican-held Senate seats up for re-election in 2018, even if the Democrats ran the table, they’d have only 59 seats in the Senate.
And history continues to humiliate the Democrats as they could have passed their gun control legislation (whatever that would be) when they controlled Congress. But whining is much more fun.
Cons and the NRA block all legislation. In fact, the Dems put up a bill, and Mitch filibustered it.
The Repugs are in charge now, and they could fix it if they had balls. But the NRA has their balls.
The NRA spent $200 million between 1998 and 2016 on political action, Unions spent $1.7 billion in 2016 alone. The NRA’s dirty money is buying all of this political action? Do you even read what you write sometimes?
Perhaps it is because Republicans are intelligent enough to understand the meaning of the words “shall not be infringed.” It seems that
JeffreyJeffery is somehow baffled by those words.“Raping 13 year old girls..†No, you’re confused as usual, J. That would be Roman Polanski, a liberal darling.
The NRA has only lobbying power, and the Dems did nothing when they had the chance. Except of course to continue to denounce the NRA. It’s almost like they didn’t really want to do anything
LOL. Oh you’re serious. Money and rabid supporters, that’s what the NRA has. And they threaten to “primary” any deserter. Rusher funneled $30 million to twit-storm tRumpy through the NRA.
There was no way a bill opposed by the NRA would get past the Senate with less than 60 liberal Dem votes. Even one red state Dem worried about re-election scuttles the deal.
But you lying propagandists know that. You’re too much like Lyin’ Don, the twit-stormer.
Sources and/or examples for anything you’re saying?
So who in reality didn’t have the balls? That would be the Democrats in Obama’s first term.