It’s almost like this has nothing to do with science and everything to do with Progressive politics
Lawmakers and scientists must come together to make sure policies aimed at mitigating climate change do not increase global poverty, according to a new study.
Why must they? Are people no longer allowed to have their own political beliefs? I don’t want a Muslim or Jew be forced to become a Christian, nor any combination of forcing. And, I don’t want to be forced to join the Cult of Climastrology. If they’re so adamant about Doing Something, let them modify their own behavior.
While the impacts of climate change are widely considered to disproportionately affect people living below the poverty line the most, climate change policies, in their efforts to stop the Earth’s temperatures from warming even more, could inadvertently increase the financial burden on the poor, researchers say in study published in Nature Communications on Tuesday.
If the study is saying “must come together,” it’s not about science, it’s about politics and Belief.
Researchers believe that climate policies should be combined with compensation policies to share the costs of climate change in a “fair way,” according to the study.
Let them spend their own money.
The model suggested by the authors of the study involves a progressive redistribution of national carbon pricing revenues that could compensate the poor for the additional financial burden as well as potentially lead to about reduction of people living in poverty by about 6 million.
The study also recommends international climate finance transfers as well, since the domestic revenues in places like sub-Saharan Africa are not sufficient enough to compensate for the climate policies in those places.
Surprise?
Ever wonder why you don’t hear about these facts?
https://nypost.com/2021/04/24/obama-admin-scientist-says-climate-emergency-is-based-on-fallacy/
#ThankYouGeorgeFloydForDying
Bwaha! Lolgfy
https://twitter.com/novakglobal/status/1372680245518626818?s=21
The left are all for redistribution of wealth, thinking it will make everybody wealthy, and
global warmingclimate change is simply another in a long line of reasons to do it.Trouble is, actual redistribution would wind up making most people poorer.
If there were some sort of window into an alternate quantum universe, in which the United States did redistribute wealth, completely evenly, within a generation we’d see that the same families which had the majority of the wealth before redistribution would have most of the wealth again. Why? Because most of the pre-redistribution wealth was held by better, more productive, smarter people, and, being better, smarter and more productive, they’d be the ones to get ahead again.