This is 100% about science and not Progressive (nice Fascism) politics, you know
Socially just population policies can mitigate climate change while advancing global equity
Socially just policies aimed at limiting the Earth’s human population hold tremendous potential for advancing equity while simultaneously helping to mitigate the effects of climate change, Oregon State University researchers say.
In a paper published this week in Sustainability Science, William Ripple and Christopher Wolf of the OSU College of Forestry also note that fertility rates are a dramatically understudied and overlooked aspect of the climate emergency. That’s especially true relative to the attention devoted to other climate-related topics including energy, short-lived pollutants and nature-based solutions, they say.
“More than 11,000 scientists from 153 countries have come together to warn that if we continue with business as usual, the result will be untold human suffering from climate change,†Ripple said. “We have listed six areas, including curbing population growth in the context of social justice, as a framework for action.
Wait, College of Forestry? Why are they coming up with policies about limiting population?
“Since 1997, there have been more than 200 articles published in Nature and Science on climate mitigation, but just four of those discussed social justice, and only two considered population,†he added. “Clearly social justice and population policy are not getting the attention they deserve in the struggle against the climate emergency.â€
The Earth’s 7.7 billion people contribute to climate change in a variety of ways, primarily through the consumption of natural resources, including non-renewable energy sources, and the greenhouse gas emissions that result from industrial processes and transportation. The more people there are on the planet, the more potential they have for affecting climate.
Partly due to forced sterilization campaigns and China’s one-child policy, population policies have long been viewed as a taboo topic and detrimental to social justice, Wolf says, but they can be just the opposite when developed and implemented appropriately with the goal of promoting human rights, equity and social justice.
It used to be that this type of stuff was on the Warmist fringe. Now it is being pushed by mainstream colleges. Of course, it usually ends up with them wanting to limit populations in areas like Africa, Latin America, Sout America, and SE Asia. You know, where all those icky minorities live. White Warmists aren’t racist at all.
Examples of badly needed population policy measures include improving education for girls and young women, ending child marriage and increasing the availability of voluntary, rights-based family planning services that empower all people and particularly poor women, the researchers say.
So, they’ve again hijacked real issues that have nothing to do with ‘climate change’, and are also happy to push abortion, calling it “rights-based family planning.” Which they also want to force on those “minorities.”
This is not a science, it is a cult. Period.
“Social justice and the climate emergency demand that equitable population policies be prioritized in parallel with strategies involving energy, food, nature, short-lived pollutants and the economy,†Ripple said. “With feedback loops, tipping points and potential climate catastrophe looming, we have to be taking steps in all of those areas and not ignoring any of them.â€
Guess who gets to control all that?
Since 1997, there have been more than 200 articles published in Nature and Science on climate mitigation, but just four of those discussed social justice, and only two considered population,†he added. “Clearly social justice and population policy are not getting the attention they deserve in the struggle against the climate emergency.â€
Silly person. The weight of an argument is in the character and value of the evidence, not in how many other people agree with your position. One great paper is sufficient if it is a good one. The author should list all the other papers and see if those topics were more worth while than another climate change or population study that comes to the same lock-step party line conclusions as all the others. More papers saying the same things do not increase the value of the original opinion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s4_OsNf1Pc
One of dozens and dozens and dozens of Scientists who question AGW Terrorism. He WAS OBAMA’s scientist on Global Warming…..LOLOL.
Bill Gates is BUILDING CARBON SCRUBBERS and guess who is totally on board with the trillions the AGW Terrorists want to spend on Climate change.