I was going to touch on this ridiculous piece on how electric vehicles cost so much less over time, because, for one thing, people rarely keep their vehicles for 15 years (the average is 4 years). But, this is is more fun in being bat guano insane
Study: Climate change poses an existential threat to outdoor recreation
Covid-19 has brought legions of new enthusiasts to the outdoors, but climate change threatens to send them right back inside.
That’s a key takeaway from a new study, “Global Environmental Change: Climate change and the demand for recreational ecosystem services on public lands in the continental United States,†by Emily J. Wilkins, Yoshimitsu Chikamotoc, Anna B. Miller, and Jordan W. Smith of Utah State University.
In the study’s abstract, its authors argue that while more people are benefiting from outdoor recreation opportunities, “Changes in climatic conditions are likely to shift the spatial and temporal demand for recreational ecosystem services. To date, little is known about the magnitude and spatial variability in these shifts across large geographic extents.†(snip)
In an interview with Wilkins, the study’s lead author, KUNR Morning Edition host Noah Glick asked her to share her key takeaways from the team’s research.
“Across the whole U.S., we were finding that in the summer, as temperatures warm, we would expect to see visitation decrease at many parks and protected areas,†Wilkins said. “I guess, in a lot of places, it’s going to be getting too warm that people are no longer going to want to be visiting in the summer necessarily.â€
In other words, demand for recreation on public lands will shift, creating a massive sea change for businesses that cater to outdoor enthusiasts—brands, retailers, adventure guides, and even non-outdoor shops in towns that serve as gateways to national parks and other recreation hotspots.
In other words, the Great Outdoors and everything associated with it is Doomed. In the future. At some point. They don’t know when. Just trust them. Because Doom is coming. They know it. Despite a minimal increase of 1.5F since 1850. And no acceleration of temperatures. And pauses. And that previous Holocene warm periods were warmer. And that a lot of this is simply land use/Urban Heat Island effect. And that these same people refuse to eliminate their own carbon footprints.
Our distinguished host quoted:
So, if fewer visit in July or August, does that mean more will visit in May, June and September?
Teachy-One-Note sees DOOM! If only he had actually read the article.
Hardly DOOM!
Teach finishes with a Gish Gallop of irrelevant proclamations…
Despite a minimal increase of 1.5F since 1850. (2F is not minimal).
And no acceleration of temperatures. And pauses. (The warming rate has doubled in the past 50 years)
And that previous Holocene warm periods were warmer. (Even if true, the causes are different)
And that a lot of this is simply land use/Urban Heat Island effect. (Little evidence to support this claim)
And that these same people refuse to eliminate their own carbon footprints. (Irrelevant)