If Sinema thought she was in trouble with the moonbats in her party now, wait till she finds out how the climate cult reacts
Kyrsten Sinema Wants to Cut $100 Billion in Proposed Climate Funds, Sources Say
climate change joke
Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, who began her political career with the Green Party and who has voiced alarm over the warming planet, wants to cut at least $100 billion from climate programs in major legislation pending on Capitol Hill, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Sinema is one of two centrist Democrats in the Senate whose votes are crucial to passing two bills that together would comprise President Biden’s legislative agenda: a $1 trillion infrastructure bill and a separate $3.5 trillion budget bill.
Last month, Ms. Sinema told The Arizona Republic, “We know that a changing climate costs Arizonans. And right now, we have the opportunity to pass smart policies to address it — looking forward to that.†In her 2018 run for the Senate, Ms. Sinema was endorsed by the League of Conservation Voters. And she has expressed an interest in using the spending bill to enact a tax or fee on carbon dioxide pollution, which experts say could be among the most effective ways to mitigate global warming.
But Ms. Sinema’s demand to cut spending on climate provisions in the budget bill could force Democrats to cut or shrink programs designed to help poor communities adapt to climate change as well as to help companies adjust as the economy transitions away from fossil fuels to clean energy.
Warmists are upset over not being able to essentially provide bribe money to “the poor” while keeping those same people poor, making them beholden to the Democratic Party.
But, wait
A spokesman for Ms. Sinema, John LaBombard, forcefully denied that Ms. Sinema requested the cuts. “Neither Senator Sinema nor our office have requested or demanded such cuts, nor have we even heard of any such demands,†he wrote in an email.
The people familiar with her request, who asked to speak anonymously because they were not authorized to speak on the record, said that she had asked for a cut to the climate program as part of a larger effort by Democrats to hunt for ways to lower the price tag of the broader spending legislation. Mr. Biden had initially envisioned a spending package of about $3.5 trillion, but Democrats are now trying to cut that to $2 trillion, in order to win support from Ms. Sinema and Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, without whose votes the measure will not pass.
So, LaBombard, on the record, says this is a load of mule fritters. Anonymous people say it did happen. Who’s telling truth? It doesn’t matter, because the point here is to get more people incensed at Sinema, to put more pressure on her, which will mean more unhinged protesters coming after her. Which is what the screed writer, Coral Davenport, a major doomsday climate cult writer, wants. Which could backfire.
Pelosi and Pope Francis meet amid push for action on climate change
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Pope Francis met Saturday, the same day the pontiff gave a speech calling on lawmakers in countries around the world to act on climate change.
“His Holiness’s encyclical Laudato Si’ is a powerful challenge to the global community to act decisively on the climate crisis with special attention to the most vulnerable communities,†Pelosi, a practicing Catholic, said in a statement released Saturday.
“I expressed the gratitude of those working on climate action in the Congress for the immense moral clarity and urgency that His Holiness continues to bring to the climate crisis, and how we continue to cherish his address to the Joint Session of Congress in 2015,†she added.
Francis on Saturday called for leaders to take action on climate change and put aside “narrow†partisan politics.
Let me get this straight, the Pope took a long fossil fueled flight to complain to Pelosi, who calls herself a Catholic despite her extreme belief in abortion on demand? And the Pope says nothing about that? Catholics, you’re religion is being destroyed from the inside.
If Democrats want climate legislation so badly, why not attempt to pass it on its own? Let’s debate their plans in full. Let’s see them answer questions.
Sunday update: the article made it seem as if the Pope came to see Pelosi. It’s actually the reverse, Pelosi took a long fossil fueled flight to Italy (for which she certainly charged the American people). Which, from an abortion on demand standpoint, is even worse, with the Pope inviting a huge believe in what the Pope calls murder to visit him.
Teach of course thinks he know best what poor people want or need
He is like a beneficent father to his children who need guidance
Well, for the last 60 years the democrats were the so-called party of the people and how has that worked out? They launched a War on Poverty in 1964 and today 37 million still live in poverty. What a success. And that does not include about 15 million unreported illegal invaders. Democrats have been the ones acting like the “benevolent father” (I assume that’s what you meant) especially to blacks and the urban poor. Except when it comes to abortion where the poor constitute 90% of the dead babies democrats endorse. Dems are behind the killing of at least 350,000 black babies a year and 205,000 urban poor or working class dead. That’s a great score even for Mengele himself.
So judging by the proliferation of drugs especially fentanyl and heroine, the inner city murder rates, crime in general, assault and rape specifically, profound and generationally perpetuated poverty and welfare dynasties I’d say Teach, or anyone other than a democrat probably knows more about what poor people need.
Have you helped the poor today? I have. Have you helped the poor this year? I have. Have you fostered poor children, big bothered inner city kids, fed a poor family or had a community drive to get poor families medical check ups? I have.
So what the fuk do you know about being the benevolent protector of the poor? Nothing so shut up.
Fuk joe hIden !
Kye: Except when it comes to abortion where the poor constitute 90% of the dead babies democrats endorse.
It’s almost as if knowledge is knocking at the door of your mind, but no one is answering . . .
When you can’t prove the person wrong, insult them. Is that Alinsky, Stalin or Marx?
Kye: When you can’t prove the person wrong, insult them.
It’s not an insult. There’s a knock at the door. You can still open the door . . .
Why is it that most abortions are among those with marginal incomes?
So John, as opposed to the government knowing what’s best for poor people’s wants and needs?
Well, now, that’s an interesting way to put it, attempting to reverse this. That’s literally the same argument that authoritarian forces have used to institute their authoritarianism.