If All You See…

February 1, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…are leaves that are falling because trees are dying from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Dissecting Leftism, with a post on the COVID narrative falling apart in South Africa.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

This entry was written by William Teach and posted on at 1:00 pm and filed under If All You See. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

10 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    February 1, 2022 at 1:21 pm

    Six weeks after Election Day, with his hold on power slipping, President Donald J. Trump directed his lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, to make a remarkable call. Mr. Trump wanted him to ask the Department of Homeland Security if it could legally take control of voting machines in key swing states, three people familiar with the matter said.

    Mr. Giuliani did so, calling the department’s acting deputy secretary, who said he lacked the authority to audit or impound the machines.

    Mr. Trump pressed Mr. Giuliani to make that inquiry after rejecting a separate effort by his outside advisers to have the Pentagon take control of the machines. And the outreach to the Department of Homeland Security came not long after Mr. Trump, in an Oval Office meeting with Attorney General William P. Barr, raised the possibility of whether the Justice Department could seize the machines, a previously undisclosed suggestion that Mr. Barr immediately shot down.

    Ken Cuccinelli and Rudy Giuliani were the saner heads in the meetings with Phil Waldron (retired Col), Patrick Byrne (Overstock.com CEO), Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell who supported a military coup…

    Mr. Giuliani was vehemently opposed to the idea of the military taking part in the seizure of machines, according to two people familiar with the matter. The conflict between him and his legal team, and Mr. Flynn, Ms. Powell and Mr. Byrne came to a dramatic head on Dec. 18, 2020, during a meeting with Mr. Trump in the Oval Office.

    At the meeting, Mr. Flynn and Ms. Powell presented Mr. Trump with a copy of the draft executive order authorizing the military to oversee the seizure of machines. After reading it, Mr. Trump summoned Mr. Giuliani to the Oval Office, according to one person familiar with the matter. When Mr. Giuliani read the draft order, he told Mr. Trump that the military could be used only if there was clear-cut evidence of foreign interference in the election.

    Ms. Powell, who had spent the past month filing lawsuits claiming that China and other countries had hacked into voting machines, said she had such evidence, the person said. But Mr. Giuliani was adamant that the military should not be mobilized, the person said, and Mr. Trump ultimately heeded his advice.

    Shortly after the Oval Office meeting, Mr. Waldron amended the draft executive order, suggesting that if the Defense Department could not oversee the seizure of machines then the Department of Homeland Security could, the person said.

    Around that time, Mr. Trump asked Mr. Giuliani to call Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, the acting deputy secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, to ask about the viability of the proposal, according to two people familiar with the matter. Mr. Cuccinelli said that homeland security officials could not take part in the plan.

  2. MarkD says:
    February 1, 2022 at 3:17 pm

    What happened to the snow? Poor woman has her poles ready and she can’t ski. Maybe there is global warming after all.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    February 1, 2022 at 7:15 pm

    Brenda,

    Telling the truth is not thinking we’re “fooling everyone”. We ask repeatedly for CREDIBLE evident to support your claims. Time and again we see stories from Gateway Pudendum etc with incredible stories of “fake” ballots, thousands of ballots 100% for President Biden…

    In Arizona, trump’s own Cyber Ninjas couldn’t find the fake votes, but “Paul Harris” did. Give us a break. Walk the “fake ballots” to court and have them examined.

    We know, we know… all in government lie to you about everything, the courts are corrupt, the media are in the palm of communists.

  4. Dana says:
    February 1, 2022 at 8:42 pm

    Who knows, maybe this was a posed glamour photo, though it really doesn’t look like one due to the tilt of her head, but she sure looks like someone’s real girlfriend!

  5. JGlanton says:
    February 2, 2022 at 12:10 am

    I’m happy for her that she finally got to sit down from her arduous trek:

    https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/stunning-woman-hiker-flannel-tekking-poles-beautiful-young-shirt-cut-off-jean-shorts-hiking-forest-deep-shade-169233201.jpg

  6. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    February 2, 2022 at 12:38 am

    When an elected school board bans books is that considered gov’t censorship?

    • Dana says:
      February 2, 2022 at 8:26 am

      Our man from Missouri asked:

      When an elected school board bans books is that considered gov’t censorship?

      When an elected school board bans pornographic sites from its library and in-school WiFi system is that considered government censorship?

      It’s saying that those books are not appropriate for a public school; it can’t keep those books out of other libraries, or off Amazon.com. The public schools have a different responsibility, in that education is compulsory, and enforced — albeit barely — by the police power of the state. It is because of the compulsory education requirement that public schools may no longer open the day with prayers, or teach religion to students, something many public schools would do if allowed.

      Government censorship would be using the power of government to prohibit the publication, sale or distribution of some material, but no level of government is required to provide any particular material. School systems, like any other agency which buys and provides books, magazines or other material, have to take decisions on what to buy and what not to buy; money, bookshelves and storage capacity are limited. There is no legal or constitutional limit on what schools may choose not to provide. You can certainly argue the wisdom of choosing to provide, or not provide, a certain group of materials, but that’s not the same thing as censorship.

  7. Hannah Hobbs says:
    February 2, 2022 at 11:41 am

    Want to earn dollars easily? this online job gave you thousands of dollars every month. start receiving every month this income just by working 1 or 2 hrs a day using mobile or any kind of PC. i have made $16429 last month by using this online job. just go to this website for more info.

    =-=-=-> http://Www.WORKJOIN1.com

Pirate's Cove