Ask A Cult Scientists: “We Can’t Convince People To Comply, So, We’ll Sue”

Thirty Five years of spreading awareness and they cannot convince everyone to give up their modern lives, elected lawmakers mostly won’t go as far as they want, so, the climastrologers will sue to force compliance

Ask A Scientist: How Can Scientists Drive Change Through Climate Lawsuits?

As the climate crisis deepens, so does the urgency to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for decades of deception. Governments representing more than a quarter of the US population have filed lawsuits against major corporations including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP, seeking justice for the harm caused by their lies about the dangers of their products. And especially on the cusp of a new Presidential administration that has vowed to support the fossil fuel industry and nominated appointees with a blatant disregard for science, the courts will become an integral arena to advance climate justice—and a pivotal space for scientists of all disciplines to make an impact.

These lawsuits hinge on the best available science to uncover the truth and inform the courts. UCS is already working with social scientists and economists, civil engineers and health practitioners who can bring extensive expertise to multi-faceted litigation. As the fossil fuel industry spares no expense to obscure these truths, the work of scientists who engage with climate litigation is increasingly vital. They bring clarity, evidence, and credibility to a high-stakes fight where lives—and the planet—are on the line.

In other words “our arguments that Mankind is evil and has caused a slight uptick in global temperatures has failed in the public domain. Henceforth we will try to get courts to force you peasants to comply. Us? Hell no, we need fossil fuels to travel to climate conferences.” Going much deeper into this article

AAS: First and foremost, like many of our readers, you are a researcher. Can you tell us a little more about those existing gaps in current scientific research that, if addressed, could further support climate litigation?

DM: As a researcher, I see significant opportunities for science to further inform climate litigation by addressing critical gaps. Our recent report on research areas for climate litigation highlights several key needs. For instance, attribution science remains a priority—establishing causal links between emissions, climate impacts, and specific events is essential for many cases. However, there’s a pressing need to expand this research to underrepresented regions, particularly in the Global South, where baseline data is often lacking. Developing new methods to suit these contexts can help ensure justice is accessible to all communities impacted by climate change.

In other words, they really do not know if there are rock solid links between Other People using fossil fuels and the slight uptick in temperatures since 1850. Mind you, this is from the Union Of Concerned Scientists, who never tell us how they made their own lives carbon neutral.

AAS: And I’ll close with this: it’s a new year, a fresh start, and folks are making resolutions. What is something concrete that you’re working on? 

DM: This year, I’m focusing on communicating the value and potential impact of scientists informing climate litigation. It’s crucial for scientists to understand that this work is about ensuring that courts have access to accurate, robust evidence to make informed decisions. Upholding the integrity of our research while making it actionable is essential to bridging the gap between science and justice.

What evidence? He just said that there are no rock solid, scientific links, essentially, just supposition from a doomsday cult.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

15 Responses to “Ask A Cult Scientists: “We Can’t Convince People To Comply, So, We’ll Sue””

  1. Jl says:

    Perfect example of the “scientific method” in action. Lawsuits in lieu of data…

  2. Elwood P Dowd says:

    Mr TEACH typed:

    Ask A Cult Scientists: “We Can’t Convince People To Comply, So, We’ll Sue”

    Of course, the scientists didn’t say this, Mr TEACH did.

    A suit for damages is a perfectly legal and appropriate action. Big Donnie has filed THOUSANDS of lawsuits. When he couldn’t win the 2020 election with lawsuits he resorted to violence. The evidence proving Big Donnie’s culpability for The Real Steal was just released, although Donnie sued to keep it hidden. He should be in prison, instead he’ll reoccupy the White House. Only in America! And Russia. And China. Belarus. Turkey. Hungary.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Whining loser.
      Go change your diapers, fat boy.

    • Jl says:

      He didn’t resort to any violence at all, now did he? But please, fill us in..

      • Elwood P Dowd says:

        Commandant Donnie sent his brownshirts to the Capitol on Jan 6 2021. “If you don’t fight like hell you won’t have a country any more!”, and on and on.

        If Fat Donnie hadn’t “won” the election he’d be defending himself in court. Again. Be sure and read Jack Smith’s report that was just released.

        Fat Donnie should be in prison, not our White House.

  3. Jl says:

    Another classic, but it’s real life.
    Los Angeles County Public Health just announced: “Please do not wear cloth or paper masks-they don’t filter out fine particles or ash”. Ok

  4. SD says:

    Pete Hegseth’s Confirmation Hearing for Secretary of Defense – January 14, 2025 – FULL VIDEO

    https://commoncts.blogspot.com/2025/01/pete-hegseths-confirmation-hearing-for.html

  5. Elwood P Dowd says:

    Speaking of Republicun shitfuckery… Congressional Repubes are insisting on “strings” for any federal aid to Californians. Sen Tumorville, Rep Byron Donalds, etc. Hey, Republicunts, did you demand “strings” for Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Kentuck??? Yeah, that…

    Republicunt Shitfuckery 2 from Marjorie Taylor Green, of course: Since the Dems control the weather, sending hurricanes to red states, why dont they cause rain in California? MTG had previously blamed CA wildfires on Jewish Space Lasers.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Not a very original thought, Rimjob.
      Only heard about the “strings” thingy about a thousand times today.
      Your White Christian wife might want to adjust your meds. Your language has become filthier than usual.

      Bwaha! Lolgfy Loser!
      MAGA47 – 6 More Days Motherfucker!

  6. drowningpuppies says:

    Best questions of the day:


    “How many Senators have shown up drunk to vote at night?

    Have any of you guys asked him to step down and resign from their job?

    And don’t tell me you haven’t seen it because I know you have.

    And then how many Senators do you know that have gotten a divorce because they cheated on their wives?

    Did you ask them to step down? No.”
    — Sen. Mark Wayne Mullin (R-OK)


    Bwaha! Lolgfy Loony Losers!
    MAGA47 – SIX MORE DAYS

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove