Climate Cult Enlists Help Of OnlyFans Harlots

By William Teach August 19, 2026 – 7:15 am

This is new. I also wanted to tone down the headline instead of using words like whores and skanks, even though the first person mention is pretty bad

From the article

Climate change has a PR problem.

For years, environmental messaging has sometimes felt preachy: buy less, fly less, eat less meat, recycle more. Important advice, certainly, but in an age of endless scrolling, even the biggest story on Earth can struggle to hold our attention.

So what if the answer is sex?

That is the thinking behind Headline Newds, a new online climate series featuring OnlyFans creators, using their enormous audiences to talk about everything from Big Oil and microplastics to solar panels and carbon footprints.

Yes, we’re airing all of this X-rated eco content pre-watershed. Don’t worry, it’s more net zero chat than nudes.

Among them is Lily Phillips, an OnlyFans star with more than two million followers and linked to superstar Drake.

What’s the carbon footprint of all that streaming?

As we tuck ourselves in, Phillips says climate change feels different.

“We’re all affected by it,” she tells me. “I’ve never had a summer like this.”

Yes, we all need to take scientific advice from the chick who did 100 men in a day. But, then, her opinion is about as scientific as most of the “climate scientists” and Elites, eh?

And as ever, there is a gendered dimension. Research has found that, on average, men tend to have larger carbon footprints. Men eat more meat and their cars guzzle more petrol, hence whole swathes of the internet dedicated to ‘Petro-Masculity’, when male power and fossil fuel consumption collide (but that’s a whole other Substack).

Yeah, I’m sure the guys paying to see the harlots will totally want to be demonized. Anyhow, 35+ years of spreading awareness and this is what the cult has come to.

Read: Climate Cult Enlists Help Of OnlyFans Harlots »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

College Groups Sue Over Immigration Rule Requiring Renewals

By William Teach August 19, 2026 – 7:00 am

There’s apparently no limits that the wackos will accept

University Groups File Immigration Lawsuit To Block Student Rule

University groups and labor unions have filed a lawsuit to block an immigration rule limiting F-1 and J-1 visa holders to fixed four-year periods. The final rule, published in July 2026, limits how long students can study in the United States without obtaining new permission from the U.S. government by eliminating the previous policy known as “duration of status.”

Today, international students are admitted for a time to pursue a course of study, meaning they can generally stay in the United States after entering as an undergraduate, going on to a master’s and then a Ph.D., without relying on new government approvals.

The new rule is part of the Trump administration’s policy to restrict all categories of legal immigration and certain temporary visa categories. The lawsuit seeks to overturn the rule before it is implemented.

Economists and educators say the administration’s final rule will reduce international student enrollment, weaken American universities’ finances and deprive companies of talent. President Trump has spoken about the benefits of international students to America, but that’s not reflected in the rule.

They came here to go to school. If they want to stick around for a masters, PhD, or a job, they need to reapply. Really, once the visa ends they need to go back to their country of origin and apply. For too long these visas have been extended and extended, changed to fit the circumstance, and these people never leave.

At U.S. universities, international students account for 80% of full-time graduate students in computer and information sciences, 75% in electrical and computer engineering, 62% in mathematics, and statistics and a majority in industrial engineering, civil engineering and mechanical engineering, according to National Science Foundation data.

Let them go home to do the jobs. Oh, and maybe Americans will then get these degrees, instead of the worthless ones.

“For more than four decades, ‘duration of status’ has been the cornerstone of the United States’ framework for admitting international students, as well as exchange visitors and representatives of foreign media,” the plaintiffs argue in their complaint. “Under this proven system, F, J, and I nonimmigrants may remain in the country for the length of their program, not some arbitrary fixed end date. This flexible approach has allowed the United States to stay competitive in the global marketplace for academic talent, and rescues universities and immigration officials from thickets of red tape.”

The plaintiffs state that the final rule “dismantles that framework, replacing duration of status with a rigid system of fixed admission periods arbitrarily capped at four years,” requiring “discretionary extensions of stay from an already overwhelmed federal immigration bureaucracy with no certainty that an extension necessary to complete the degree program they have invested in attaining will be granted.”

Are they really saying that these college kids cannot fill out the required document? Really? If the kiddies do not like the rule that can stay home. What this is really about is money. Colleges want that money, which tends to be paid “in cash”, rather than student loans which get defaulted on.

Read: College Groups Sue Over Immigration Rule Requiring Renewals »

Posted in Illegal Immigration | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Why Are Leftists Fighting For Hardcore Islam?

By William Teach August 18, 2026 – 3:00 pm

This is a great thought on the why’s

…and yet they defend countries where women are banned from school, where honor killings happen, and where wives have no protection, or no legal protection from abuse.

They wave pride flags at every parade, and yet they defend countries where homosexuality is punishable by death. So what then exactly does the progressive left and these Islamists have in common?

Because on the surface, they agree on literally nothing, except for one thing: They share the same enemy, and that enemy is the West

And the thing is, neither of them can build what they want while the West still stands. So they’re kind of working together to tear it down first, and figure the rest out later.

The Marxist thinks he’s using the Islamists to do the heavy lifting. The useful idiots vote them in, platform them, defend them, and launder every atrocity as resistance. And what awaits them when the job is done is something history has already shown us.

Iran, 1977, the Marxists and Islamists united to overthrow the Shah. The moment they won, the Islamists executed every single leftist who helped bring them to power: jailed, tortured, or gone. The left handed them the revolution and got a bullet for it”

There’s more in the video/tweet. It’s something I and others have said for decades: Democrats are Useful Idiots. Especially when they decided they would quietly take the side of Islamic extremists because Bush 43 was president, due to BDS and because they were indoctrinated into this kind of idiocy, forgetting that Islamic extremism is in direct competition with the Progressives/Marxists/Liberals/whatever you call them.

And the crazy thing is, the Islamists don’t even hide this is what they’re doing, they openly say they’re using the Left until enough of them get into power

The Islamists tell you exactly what they want to do. They do not hide it at all. And liberals are completely broken

Read: Why Are Leftists Fighting For Hardcore Islam? »

Posted in Democrats | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 18, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is horrible carbon pollution driven extreme rain, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Climate Change Dispatch, with a post on “Climate Alarmists Go Silent: Turns Out Fossil Fuels Are Earth’s ‘Miracle-Gro’”

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | No Comments | Trackback URL

Unelected California Bureaucrats Just Restricted What Types Of Replacement Tires Citizens Can Buy

By William Teach August 18, 2026 – 10:30 am

Democrats are constantly yammering about “Democracy!”, yet, they constantly have groups of unelected bureaucrats making rules that affect all citizens and jacking up their lives

Let’s go to their article

California regulators on Monday approved new rules that will restrict what tires you can buy when it’s time to replace them on your car.

In a unanimous vote, the California Energy Commission voted to adopt new rules that will phase out the sale of replacement tires that don’t meet certain energy efficiency standards.

“This ultimately is about protecting consumers,” said David Hochschild, the chairman of the California Energy Commission. “I see this as sheltering the public from higher costs in the long run.”

Tire manufacturers and the commission’s staff are at odds over whether this will add to the cost of living in the state. Both sides acknowledged this will no longer allow the sale of a significant portion of the tires currently sold in California.

You’ll pay a lot more for tires while saving a couple dollars in “efficiency”. Always run when a Democrat talks about “protecting consumers”. The only bright side is this doesn’t kick in for years

The first phase would begin in 2029, which would allow the sale of tires with a maximum rolling resistance level of 9.1 newtons per kilonewton (N/kN). In phase 2, the standard lowers to 7.2 (N/kN) starting in 2033. The commission came up with the standards after testing 537 types of tires.

If it’s so imperative to save citizens money and stop climate doom why is it always in the future?

According to the commission’s staff, the rules are meant to ensure replacement tires sold in California are at least as energy efficient on average as the tires that come with the car or truck when it’s originally sold. The CEC claims Californians could save $79 in four months in gas or electricity costs under phase 1, and about $153 in phase 2 within seven months.

Not a chance in hell those numbers are real from fuel savings, and then we figure that the tires will cost a lot more.

Bret Gladfelty, on behalf of Goodyear, told the commission that this will increase costs for consumers and said the commission had yet to resolve technical and legal issues with the rules.

In a letter to the CEC, Gladfelty had questioned the data the CEC released to the public about the cost of new tires, noting that while the commission says the price increases average about $6.50 per tire in phase 2, Gladfelty warned increase costs could actually end up being in the several hundreds of dollars.

Gladfelty told KCRA 3 this new rule will eliminate an estimated 70% of the tires currently sold in California by 2033.

I wonder how many Californians will head to Nevada, Arizona, and Oregon to get tires? Which means a lot of stores in California will lose money and maybe go out of business.

Read: Unelected California Bureaucrats Just Restricted What Types Of Replacement Tires Citizens Can Buy »

Posted in Democrats, Global Warming | 20 Comments | Trackback URL

Insane: Hawaii Has Children Advising DOT Due To Climate Doom

By William Teach August 18, 2026 – 7:15 am

This is truly insane

What happened after 13 young people in Hawaii sued over climate change

Young people in Hawaii now meet regularly with the state’s Department of Transportation to offer input on public transit, bike lanes, and other strategies to help the department transition away from fossil fuels.

Establishing the Hawai‘i Youth Transportation Council was just one of the outcomes of the landmark 2024 settlement of the Navahine v. Hawai‘i DOT lawsuit, which was brought by 13 young plaintiffs. Their lawsuit alleged that the DOT wasn’t making progress toward the climate goals set by the state, violating the plaintiffs’ constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment.

They settled the lawsuit in 2024 before it went to trial, and the DOT is now required to decarbonize transportation by 2045 and, through the youth council, to listen and incorporate the priorities of young Hawaiians.

Well, Hawaii is chock full of climate cultists, so, when does the government give up all it’s fossil fueled vehicles, planes, boats, and helicopters? Same for the private citizens? When do they end the use of all the airports and seaports?

Yale Climate Connections: Charlotte, what got you concerned about climate change in the first place?

Charlotte Madin: I was born in Sydney, Australia, and I lived there until I was eight years old. And while I lived there, my family and I would often experience really large heat waves that would make us essentially have to evacuate our home and go to the nearest air-conditioned place because my mother was concerned that my sister and I would be sick or have health concerns due to this heat.

The entire time I’ve lived in Hawaii, about eight years now, I’ve noticed the beautiful ocean and the biodiversity of the coral reefs just slowly becoming less and less healthy, which is really challenging to see, especially since both my parents are marine biologists….

So, wait, she and her family took a long fossil fueled flight from Sydney? I can bet her parents both use fossil fueled boats. And, more importantly, the Hawaiian DOT is taking advice from a 16 year old (is she even a US citizen?)? That’s nuts.

YCC: What are some of the major points that the settlement requires the government to do?

Zeigler: The settlement requires HDOT to decarbonize the transportation sector by 2045, which means zero emissions from ground, marine, and interisland air transportation. And the settlement provides benchmarks and requirements for what HDOT needs to do to reach zero emissions.

Well, good luck with that. And good luck thinking people are going to take expensive vacations to Hawaii and have to travel by bike and such.

Read: Insane: Hawaii Has Children Advising DOT Due To Climate Doom »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Boston Is Thrilled To Get 4 Star Designation For Helping Illegals

By William Teach August 18, 2026 – 7:00 am

Did anyone know there was a rating system for this?

Boston certified 4-star destination for welcoming immigrants

Sanctuary Boston was rewarded for rolling out the red carpet for immigrants with a “4-star certified welcoming designation” from Welcoming America, making it the first Massachusetts city to earn a certification.

Mayor Michelle Wu announced the designation on Monday, saying that it recognizes Boston as a national leader in creating policies, programs, and practices that support immigrant inclusion and belonging.

“Boston has been shaped by generations of immigrants seeking a better future and working hard to build the city we enjoy today,” Wu said in a statement. “I’m proud of the work of our Office for Immigrant Advancement, community partners, and neighborhood and cultural leaders to expand civic engagement, support our communities, and make Boston a city where everyone belongs.”

Most of those immigrants, particularly the Irish, came legally. And worked hard and assimilated. They loved the U.S. Unlike the illegals, who do not assimilate and demand the US provide everything

Wu’s office said Boston met the criteria across all seven areas of the Welcoming Standard, Welcoming America’s roadmap for building inclusive communities: government and community leadership, equitable access, civic engagement, connected communities, education, economic development, and safe communities.

Boston’s 4-star designation falls short of the highest 5-star welcoming rating for immigrant inclusion. Chicago and San Jose, California also earned 4-star ratings this year. San Francisco received the highest 5-star designation.

Daniel Valdez, deputy director of Welcoming America, said Boston has been recognized as the first certified welcoming community in Massachusetts.

Massachusetts spends over $1 billion a year on illegals, with most going to Boston. Boston itself is spending millions of resident money yearly on illegals, such as for legal defense, something they do not give to the Americans who live in Boston.

Wu on Sunday said she plans to use freedom of information laws to try to figure out who wants to lease parking spaces to ICE Boston in order to prevent the agency’s immigration enforcement officers from parking in Boston.

I though FOI laws were meant for government, not private citizens/companies? This is some serious doxxing going on here, where the government is coming after citizens for wholly legally activities that Government doesn’t agree with.

Read: Boston Is Thrilled To Get 4 Star Designation For Helping Illegals »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

Landlords In NYC Can Buy Their Way Out Of Climate Compliance

By William Teach August 17, 2026 – 3:04 pm

One way or the other, all it means is that tenants will be paying

Landlords can buy their way out of NYC’s climate law starting this week

As a candidate, Mayor Zohran Mamdani pledged to close loopholes that allowed landlords to limit compliance with the city’s landmark law capping building emissions.

But later this week, landlords will have the opportunity to buy their way out of the climate law through an energy credits program initiated by his predecessor, Mayor Eric Adams.

Advocates say the ability to purchase renewable energy credits disincentivize property owners from reducing emissions. They say the credits cost less than the necessary climate-friendly upgrades or the penalties for noncompliance with the climate law, known as Local Law 97.

“Advocates”. Do any of them actually own rental property in NYC?

Local Law 97 is intended to force landlords to reduce emissions from buildings, which account for about two-thirds of the city’s carbon pollution. But many landlords and co-op owners have long said they cannot afford to retrofit their buildings to reduce pollution, and that the penalties for noncompliance are onerous.

“Pollution”. CO2 is not a pollutant.

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority will put the first round of credits up for sale on Wednesday. The credits are projected to generate nearly $1.8 million that will go toward the Champlain Hudson Power Express transmission line bringing hydropower from Quebec to New York City.

Oh, good, from Quebec. I wonder how much of the money will disappear into graft and fraud?

“The City is committed to helping property owners reinvest in their own buildings and avoid penalties by getting on a manageable compliance pathway to reduce carbon emissions through energy efficiency retrofits,” he said. “Local Law 97 allows covered building owners to purchase renewable energy credits as one of those compliance pathways, which supports a cleaner grid for our city and helps to cut down on overall pollution.”

“Helping.” Force is not help.

Read: Landlords In NYC Can Buy Their Way Out Of Climate Compliance »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 17, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is a sea that will soon rise dozens of feet, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sister Toldjah, with a post on “FBI Releases Data on Historic Drop in Violent Crime Rate, Media Can’t Figure Out Who to Credit”

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | No Comments | Trackback URL

Surprise: Democrats Now Favor Socialism Over Capitalism

By William Teach August 17, 2026 – 10:30 am

Do they actually know what Socialism is per Political Science 101? Or what it actually means for Modern Socialism? Are they willing to give up their own money, or, do they want to make their own money and have money taken from Other People to pay for all the free stuff?

Dems now favor socialism over capitalism by this overwhelming amount: new poll

Democrats now overwhelmingly have a more favorable view of socialism than capitalism, according to a shocking new poll.

Nearly 60% of party members support socialism compared to 18% who view it negatively, while just 32% have a favorable view of capitalism compared to 50% who see it as negative, according to the CBS News/YouGov survey.

The poor marks for capitalism among Democrats get even worse when narrowed down to those who have a college degree, with 71% of that group favoring socialism compared to 16% viewing it unfavorably, the poll showed.

The disturbing findings come as Democrats are engaged in a so-called “battle for the soul” of their party.

Democratic Socialists of America-backed and allied candidates have had a series of breakthrough victories in Democratic primaries across the country throughout the 2026 election cycle.

Will the be good with the Government taking over their own small businesses? Running their big businesses?

When asked to describe the free market, an overwhelming 66% of respondents said it was good for the US economy, compared to 34% who called it bad.

Yet on a policy level, there are signs that even Republicans are supportive of certain policies historically associated with socialism, such as price controls.

Economists generally oppose price controls, arguing they can disrupt supply and demand, which can lead to consequences such as shortages of certain goods or services.

How is massive government intervention in healthcare and higher education working out? But, of course, things like price controls, rent control, and more are not the point. It’s all the other things that comes with Modern Socialism, starting with Government controlling your life and restricting your freedom. And then just the ultra-Crazy, like no borders, no police, no prisons. A lot of the support is from Millennials and Gen Z, who were indoctrinated into this belief.

Read: Surprise: Democrats Now Favor Socialism Over Capitalism »

Posted in Barking Moonbats | 9 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove