SCOTUS To Hear Trump Case On Being Removed From Colorado Ballot. When Is Biden Removed?

Not sure why he’s bothering: he won’t win the state, and Trump voters can write his name in. But, I suppose the forms must be followed

Supreme Court to hear Trump ballot removal case out of Colorado

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon debate whether former President Donald Trump should be removed from Colorado’s primary ballot, the first of what could be several legal challenges by Trump to confront the nine justices.

At issue is whether Trump committed “insurrection” by inciting a crowd to storm the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6, 2021, and whether that would make him constitutionally ineligible to be re-elected president. That, in turn, could block him from appearing on a state primary ballot as a candidate for that office.

Oral arguments are scheduled for Thursday at 10 a.m. ET, and an expedited ruling could come within days or weeks.

The issues have never been tested at the nation’s highest court and are framed as both a constitutional and political fight with enormous stakes for public confidence in the judicial system and the already divisive electoral process.

What does the 14th Amendment state on the subject?

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

So, when is Biden booted from ballots? It’s pretty rebellious when he opens up the border and allows people who hate America to come into the U.S. willy nilly. People from China, Iran, and lots of countries which are Islamic extremists. Gang members, such as MS-13. He’s put Americans at risk.

Read: SCOTUS To Hear Trump Case On Being Removed From Colorado Ballot. When Is Biden Removed? »

Your Fault: Hotcoldwetdry Will Bring Megafloods To California

It’s pretty easy to make this prognostication after California has been hit with a few huge rain event storms. It’s funny, though, because not that long ago we got

That last one was from 2022

Climate change will bring megafloods to California

Climate change is making it a matter of time before a megaflood hits the state.

The Santa Barbara police car blocked access to the bridge, lights flashing as the thundering, swollen brown river rampaged below. The water was running so high in this Southern California county that it gushed through the railings of the bridge, and poured out onto the road.

This region is familiar with water scarcity – usually battling extreme heatwaveswildfires, and drought. Now, Southern California is confronting an overabundance of water, in the form of torrential rain and life-threatening floods. (snip)

And experts say that the frequency and intensity of these kinds of events will only increase. These severe floods in California are a “broadly underappreciated risk”, according to a 2022 paper, co-authored by Daniel Swain and Xingying Huang, scientists at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado. (snip)

Climate change is increasing the risk of a California megaflood, Swain’s study warns. This extreme storm scenario would produce runoffs 200-400% greater than anything seen before in the Sierra Nevada, the sprawling 400-mile (650km) mountain range that traverses 24 of the 58 counties in California.

California does, in fact, have a long history of flood years, with a record going back to 1605 (that was during the Little Ice Age), just like with drought years. It’s the nature of where it is located on the Pacific Ocean. There was nothing anthropogenic about that 1605 flooding, right? That had 45 days of flooding in December 1861-January 1862. It’s just nature. You’re making it more dangerous now because of land use. All those buildings and roads.

But, as they start blaming the flooding on you, will it now flip back to drought, which they will also blame on you?

Read: Your Fault: Hotcoldwetdry Will Bring Megafloods To California »

Bummer: SCD Out Of Space, SCB Almost Out Of Space

Well, these declared sanctuary cities need to find a way to make it work. Perhaps they could force Democrat voters to take some in to their own homes?

Democrat City Raises Red Flag on Surging Migrant Population: ‘Out of Space’

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston is pulling the alarm on housing migrants, saying that shelters within city limits have run “out of space.”

On Monday, the largest city in Colorado began a multi-week process of discharging what has been described as the largest per-capita surge of migrants into one area in the entire United States. More than 120 migrant families were affected at the beginning of the week, the first of some 800 families consisting of upwards of 3,000 individuals being forced to find new refuge. Denver has spent more than $42 million already in addressing the crisis.

The city is also whining that other cities which are not declared sanctuary cities are refusing to help. Why should they? They didn’t ask for this. Sanctuary City Denver did.

Boston mayor says Roxbury migrant overflow site reaching capacity

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu said the overflow site for migrant families at a Roxbury recreation center is quickly reaching its 400-person capacity, two weeks after it was opened by the state.

Wu said most of the families who had been sleeping at Logan International Airport were brought in right away when the state-owned Melnea A. Cass Recreational Complex was converted into a safety-net site on Jan. 31, and now families from other temporary housing situations including a Revere hotel are being brought in.

Bummer. They voted for this. If you leave the milk out on the counter for too long and the whole house stinks, well, that’s on you. You fix it. You deal with it.

$2.4 Billion Is Not Enough for New York’s Migrant Crisis, Adams Says

With the migrant crisis continuing to roil New York City, Mayor Eric Adams appeared to score a win last month when the governor vowed to commit $2.4 billion — more than double last year’s proposal — to cover the costs of caring for the tens of thousands of people who have arrived in New York to seek refuge.

But on Tuesday, Mr. Adams said even that would not be enough.

Testifying at the State Capitol in Albany, the mayor told lawmakers that the state would need to pony up at least half the cost of caring for migrants to keep the city from making drastic budget cuts, a figure his team put at $4.6 billion.

Strange how supporters of unfettered illegal immigration always say that it not only costs nothing, but, illegals actually are a net monetary benefit.

Read: Bummer: SCD Out Of Space, SCB Almost Out Of Space »

Warmist Taylor Swift Threatens College Student Who Tracks Elites Use Of Private Jets

It’s long been known that Taylor Swift is a massive climahypocrite. How much in the way of fossil fuels does it take to put on one of her massive concerts, from moving Taylor and crew and all the props and clothes and amps and stuff to all the Swifties coming to the concerts in fossil fueled vehicles. Oh, and her use of private jets

Taylor Swift threatens college student with legal action after tracking her private jet

Taylor Swift’s lawyers have issued a cease and desist letter to a college computer programming student who uses public flight data to monitor the private jet usage of several high-profile figures.

The letter was reportedly sent to Jack Sweeney, a student at the University of Central Florida, who was briefly suspended from X – formally known as Twitter – in December 2022 after he tracked Elon Musk’s plane.

According to reports, the programmer is facing similar accusations of “stalking and harassing behaviour” for tracking the flights of Swift’s private jet.

“Firstly I’d like to clarify that my intentions are not to cause harm,” Sweeney told The Independent in a statement. “I actually like some of her songs”.

The student went on to defend his actions claiming a “public interest” argument, insisting that the pop star should “reasonably expect” the jet to be tracked since the Japanese embassy participated in an online discussion about whether Swift would be able to fly from her Toyko concert to Las Vegas in time for the Super Bowl.

Like most climate elites, she doesn’t like it when people call her out. And, really, as Sweeney has stated, all her flights are public record. And he doesn’t seem to be backing down, just like he didn’t back down to Elon Musk.

Meanwhile

Taylor Swift quietly downsizes to one private jet

Taylor Swift is down to one private jet.

The singer parted ways with her Dassault Falcon 900 on January 30, according to the Federal Aviation Authority’s website.

The jet had previously been listed under SATA LLC, a company with the same address as Taylor Swift Productions in Nashville, according to Tennessee Secretary of State documents. Swift’s holding company acquired the Dassault Falcon 900 in 2009, per FAA data.

That jet has a price tag of $44 million. Is she playing a shell game, and will actually still travel in it, or, is it actually gone? She still has her Dassault 7X, which is a bigger plane and starts at $54 million, and can travel almost 6,000 nautical miles, enough to go from Tokyo to Las Vegas directly, though, most likely would fly into Alaska from Japan then down to LV.

If Swift doesn’t use her 7X plane to get to Tokyo for this week’s string of concerts, fans have wondered how she’ll travel to the Super Bowl this weekend in Las Vegas to cheer on her boyfriend, Travis Kelce. Most likely, she’ll charter a private plane.

The singer has faced backlash for her private-jet usage in the past. In 2022, Swift topped a list of celebrities with the most private-jet carbon emissions. Last year, BI reported that the singer’s private jets spent more than 166 hours in flight during the initial US leg of her Eras tour.

Swift’s spokesperson previously told BI the singer had purchased carbon credits to offset her jet use.

See, the climate cult Elites are fine with forcing you out of your use of fossil fuels, but, for themselves, they just buy offsets to continue living their big carbon footprint lives.

Read: Warmist Taylor Swift Threatens College Student Who Tracks Elites Use Of Private Jets »

If All You See…

…is an Evil fossil fueled vehicle causing Bad Weather heatsnow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Greenie Watch, with a post on the green energy push leading to green crime.

I seriously hope she finished cleaning off the car after the selfie.

Read: If All You See… »

Special Council To Release Report On Biden’s Classified Docs Very Soon

Who wants to bet that the report says that Biden was a bad boy, that he shouldn’t have had them, but, everything’s OK, no charges recommended?

DOJ Investigation Into Biden’s Handling of Classified Documents Ends With No Charges

The U.S. Justice Department won’t file charges against President Joe Biden over his handling of classified documents found in his private home and office, but an investigative report will be critical of his actions, a person familiar with the matter said Tuesday.

Special Counsel Robert Hur, who was appointed last year by Attorney General Merrick Garland to lead the Biden documents probe, has wrapped up the investigation, according to the person, who asked not to be identified disclosing non-public information. Findings in the investigation report could be released this week, the person said.

The development removes a major legal and political weight hanging over Biden as he runs for reelection. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, who is the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, is facing felony charges related to his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

As we know, Biden had lots of classified documents in many places that were unsecured, including his garage next to his Vette. He pretty much had no authority to have them from his time as Vice President and Senator.

The decision not to charge Biden isn’t surprising because it involved seemingly innocent mishandling of classified papers that were uncovered and immediately handed over for investigation, according to Barbara McQuade, a former federal prosecutor.

“Trump’s case is completely different because of his willful refusal to return the documents,” McQuade said. “And the cover up.”

Except, Biden didn’t have the authority to have the documents at all. As someone who was in the Senate since 1973, and eight years as VP, he should have known. What’s the old say “ignorance of the law is no excuse”? He knew the law. He just didn’t care. If it was some low ranking federal bureaucrat or military member they’d be charged and prosecuted. We all knew that the investigation was going to end like this.

White House officials have argued the Biden case is different because the president’s staff turned over classified documents voluntarily when they were discovered and invited the search of his Delaware home. Biden conducted a voluntary interview with investigators in early October.

Except, that makes no difference. He unlawfully had the documents. That’s it. But, the fix was in.

Read: Special Council To Release Report On Biden’s Classified Docs Very Soon »

Your Fault: Hotcoldwetdry Threatening Holocaust Sites

Climate cult members will do and say anything to push their cult and it’s governmental authoritarianism

Climate change is threatening Holocaust sites, group warns

An international advocacy group has sounded the alarm on the escalating threat climate change poses to Holocaust-related sites, including former concentration camps and mass graves, Axios reported.

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) warns that extreme weather events, exacerbated by climate change, are causing irreversible damage to these historically significant locations.

Recent reports from the IHRA reveal that floods and severe storms have wreaked havoc on several key sites across Europe.

In the Czech Republic, the former ghetto of Terezin has been hit hard, with buildings sustaining significant damage. Similarly, the perimeter wall of the Sachsenhausen concentration camp in Germany has been extensively destroyed by severe weather.

In Austria, floodwaters breached the former subcamp of Gusen, reaching the crematorium and causing damage. Additionally, mass graves at the subcamp of Ustica in Croatia are under threat from rising floodwaters.

It’s sad, but, weather happens. It always has and always will, and, sometimes it is extreme.

The potential loss of Holocaust sites also raises concerns about the spread of misinformation and the distortion of historical facts. As antisemitism and White nationalism continue to rise in various countries, the preservation of these sites becomes even more crucial in countering false narratives.

So, in order to deal with all this, your freedom of speech and thought must be stopped.

Read: Your Fault: Hotcoldwetdry Threatening Holocaust Sites »

Biden Blamestorms Republicans, Trump For Killing Border Deal

And all the media are happy to run with his blamestorming rather than analyzing the reality

‘Show a little courage’: Biden attacks Republicans for ‘caving’ to Trump on US-Mexico border security bill

Joe Biden urged Congress to pass the bipartisan border bill in a pointed speech on Tuesday, accusing Republicans of “caving” in to Donald Trump’s demands to block the legislation from advancing.

“All indications are this bill won’t even move forward to the Senate floor. Why? A simple reason: Donald Trump. Because Donald Trump thinks it’s bad for him politically,” Biden said at the White House. “He’d rather weaponize this issue than actually solve it.”

With an eye toward the presidential race, Trump has attacked the bipartisan deal on Truth Social as “nothing more than a highly sophisticated trap for Republicans to assume the blame on what the Radical Left Democrats have done to our Border, just in time for our most important EVER Election”.

As of Tuesday afternoon, it appeared that more than 20 Republican senators were prepared to oppose the border bill, raising serious doubts about its passage.

In his speech, Biden pledged he would make sure that Republicans received the blame if the bill does not pass, indicating he would spotlight the issue on the campaign trail.

“The American people are going to know why it failed. I’ll be taking this issue to the country,” Biden said. “Every day between now and November, the American people are going to know that the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his Maga [‘Make America Great Again’] Republican friends. It’s time for Republicans in the Congress to show a little courage, to show a little spine, to make it clear to the American people that you work for them – not for anyone else.”

Trump is 100% right: this was a trap bill, and Republicans like James Lankford got rolled, just like with the old Gang Of 8 idiocy. The GOP had two choices: pass this turd of a bill, which would codify catch and release, give work permits immediately to those demanding asylum and even illegals, give taxpayer funded legal council to illegals, expand parole, and barely fund border security, most of which won’t kick in for several years, or, refuse to vote for this and be demonized for “not wanting to secure the border”, the same one Biden left wide open. And not fund Ukraine, Israel, and stopping fentanyl.

It’s better the GOP go with option two. But, will they, other than Trump, have the cajones to tell the truth and defend their decision without being wishy-washy? This was a trap bill. Democrats do this all the time, putting poison pills in then demonizing Republicans for refusing to pass them. If I offer you chocolate, shrimp, lobster, filet, and your favorite veggie, but, you also have to do a little meth, yeah, it’s that meth thing that shuts your support down, right?

The House should pass a Ukraine bill, an Israel bill, and the fentanyl bill separately, then take the border bill, remove all the bad parts, and vote on it. Make the border security, including the wall, a this year thing.

Read: Biden Blamestorms Republicans, Trump For Killing Border Deal »

Senator Mike Lee Explains Just How Bad The Border Bill Is

But, first, let’s go to National Review, which apparently did not get rid of all their squishes. Noah Rothman apparently thinks this is a case of a hawkish bill meeting a dovish GOP, meaning those who are against it

But then, perhaps the border provisions in this bill aren’t central to the GOP’s opposition — that’s certainly the impression one gets from the rump of malcontents in the Republican House conference who, given the meagerness of the GOP’s majority, can control the agenda. To hear them and influential outsiders loyal to Donald Trump talk about the bill, the biggest problem with it is the funding it provides to Ukraine for its defense against a Russian invasion. Indeed, the whole reason why funding for Ukraine was included in a comprehensive bill designed to address all of America’s mounting challenges abroad at once was to help GOP lawmakers swallow that pill. The ploy seems to have backfired. As Ron DeSantis’s press secretary, Jeremy Redfern, put it, given the $60 billion devoted to providing Ukrainians with ordnance, the bill provides “more cash to protect Ukraine’s border than our border.”

Noah wants the GOP to cave on a bill that contains a whole bunch of good stuff, but, has A LOT of really bad stuff that codifies lots of illegals and migrants, and still incentivizes them to come illegally. Andrew C McCarthy conversely writes at NRO that it should be killed off

On X/Twitter, Fox News’ superb reporter Bill Melugin has a good analysis of the long-awaited Senate border legislation. It is very fair in presenting what is enticing about the proposal. The problem is that what is enticing is disingenuous and, ultimately, counterproductive.

That is to say, the good in the bipartisan Senate negotiators’ proposal — and there definitely is some — (a) can already be accomplished under current law, and (b) would require faith that the Biden administration will for some reason enforce these provisions even though it has systematically refused to enforce existing border-security provisions. More important, to get the illusory good in the proposal, Congress would have to enact provisions in the deal that would both undermine existing statutory restrictions and etch into our law magnets for illegal immigration.

The most significant aspect of the deal (which can be read here) is the one the senators tout as, in effect, not merely forcing an immediate shutdown of the border but ending the main driver of illegal immigration — ending, as Melugin aptly puts it, “the whole idea of ‘I made it to U.S. soil, you have to process me.’”

Immediately, we detect the flaw in the senators’ calculations that I have repeatedly emphasized (see, e.g., herehere, and here): Both legally and practically speaking, the border can be shut down, right this instant. There is no legal requirement that any alien who sets foot on American soil be permitted to apply for asylum (which is a discretionary act of national clemency, not a right of the alien). There is similarly no mandate that such aliens be routed into a “process” that enables them to remain — even though their first contact with our nation is to flout its laws, and even though empowering illegal aliens this way is patently harmful to aliens who are attempting to enter by complying with our laws.

Let’s say this horrible bill passes: does anyone think Biden will actually do a damned thing to shut the border if he wins in November? He’s trying to look tough now with an election coming up and an electorate which is incensed by what’s going on. He wins, the border is right back to what he’s done the last three years.

Let’s go to Senator Lee. Putting it under the more tag, it’s long

Read More »

Read: Senator Mike Lee Explains Just How Bad The Border Bill Is »

Climate Cult Desperately Trying To Make Category 6 Hurricanes A Thing

This was pretty much in the realm of fiction previously. I remember reading a disaster book a long time ago about how technology caused the weather to get out of control and hurricanes were merging to become super-hurricanes. It’s still in the realm of fiction

‘Category 5’ was considered the worst hurricane. There’s something scarier, study says.

As fearsome as Category 5 hurricanes can be for people living in harm’s way, a new study reports global warming is supercharging some of the most intense cyclones with winds high enough to merit a hypothetical Category 6.

The world’s most intense hurricanes are growing even more intense, fueled by rising temperatures in the ocean and atmosphere, according to the study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. And, the authors say, a Category 5 on the traditional wind scale underestimates their dangers.

“As a cautious scientist, you never want to cry wolf,” said Michael Wehner, co-author and climate scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. But after searching for the signature of climate change in the world’s most intense cyclones, Wehner said he and co-author Jim Kossin found “the wolf is here.”

But, they’re crying wolf, because they’ve become cult scientists.

They used a hypothetical Category 6, with a minimum threshold of 192 mph, to study hurricanes that have occurred in the modern satellite era, since around 1980. They found five hurricanes and typhoons that would have met the criteria and all five occurred within the last decade.

To be clear, they aren’t proposing adding that category to the National Hurricane Center’s wind scale, which experts say would require a lengthy process and many partners. But they are hoping to “inform broader discussions about how to better communicate risk in a warming world,” Kossin told USA TODAY.

Except, from what I’ve been able to determine, they’re discussing wind gusts, not continuous wind speed. Tropical systems are categorized by the wind speed over one minute at 10 meters above ground/sea level. Not gusts. And we’ve seen the Warmists equate gusts with storm size, not measuring at the right height or using the 1 minute threshold. It gets better

They found the chances of that potential intensity occurring in such storms have more than doubled since 1979. They say the areas where the growing risks of these storms are of greatest concern are the Gulf of Mexico, the Philippines, parts of Southeast Asia and Australia.

1979. The satellite era. We don’t know about anything previously. Nor do we have specific measurements from during the Little Ice Age. What if they were worse during Holocene cool periods? We don’t know. We have no reference. There is no control sources. Do we know the specifics on, say, the Great Galveston Hurricane of 1900? This is all just cult scaremongering.

Read: Climate Cult Desperately Trying To Make Category 6 Hurricanes A Thing »

Pirate's Cove