Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Peter Driben

Happy Sunday! Another great day in the Once and Future Nation Of America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, and had to flip on the heat for the first time. This pinup is by Peter Driben, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Cold Fury notes there are no bad dogs, just bad owners
  2. Common Cents Blog covers Netanyahu declaring war
  3. Da Techguy’s Blog is not pleased with Ahsoka
  4. Doug Ross @ Journal discusses a 50th anniversary war
  5. Flopping Aces covers Biden funding Israel’s 9/11
  6. Gates Of Vienna notes taking hostages and desecrating corpses being another day in Gaza
  7. Geller Report features the Taliban asking Iran for safe passage to Israel to fight
  8. IOTW Report covers Trump unveiling his anti-crime agenda
  9. Legal Insurrection shows Let’s Go Brandon blaming the media for people not appreciating his economy
  10. Moonbattery notes the FBI targeting Trump supporters
  11. neo-neocon discusses the killing of innocents being more than just collateral
  12. Never Yet Melted says it’s time to eliminate Hamas once and for all
  13. Pacific Pundit highlights AOC implying Israel is guilty of oppression and occupation
  14. Powerline Blog covers Hamas doing Iran’s bidding
  15. And last, but, not least, The Gateway Pundit has video of Hamas attacking a peace concert

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Poll Shows Sanctuary City Chicago Citizens Not Happy Over Illegal Immigration

As has been said so many times, having DeSantis and Abbott, especially Abbott, sending busload after busload after busload to sanctuary cities and states was a brilliant move, forcing them to actually deal with their beliefs, such as Sanctuary City Chicago (SCC)

New survey reveals how voters feel about Chicago’s sanctuary city status

More than 60% of respondents in a recent survey believe Chicago’s sanctuary city status should be removed.

Polling firm, M3 Strategies, finished conducting a survey this week on the migrant situation and sanctuary city policies in Chicago.

M3 Strategies surveyed 659 randomly selected likely Chicago voters between Oct. 1 to 3.

According to the poll, 70% of voters surveyed say focus on housing new migrants is negatively affecting current Chicago residents in need. This opinion rings true across several demographics, with 67% of Democrats, 74% of women, 79% of Black, 71% of Hispanic, and 75% of West and South side voters agreeing supporting migrants comes at the expense of Chicagoans.

Safety was also a concern with 50% of respondents saying housing migrants makes Chicago less safe.

I’m not sure how Chicago can be less safe, but, perhaps from those who live in the safer areas of SCC they feel in danger

The survey found that 39% of respondents believe Chicago should remain a sanctuary city. Support for remaining a sanctuary city is strongest among White voters and on the North and Northwest sides.

Those would be the areas who are not having illegals sheltered. They do not get them in the high-toned and fancy-toodoo sections of Chicago.

“The feds must step up at the border. This along with the numerous homeless encampments and the daily random violence without any consequence, makes stepping out of my home scary,” a 46-64-year-old Democratic Hispanic woman said via the survey.

In other words, shut it down as much as possible

“I support Chicago being a migrant city but the volume of people entering the city and the large cost are not sustainable. Local and federal government need to work together to figure out how to fix our crisis at the border and determine a long-term fix because we have other large issues in this city that need to be addressed as well as migrants,” an 18-30-year-old Democratic White woman said.

Double in other words, this uber-Progressive supports SCC being a migrant city as long as there aren’t migrants in Chicago. Fixing the border is easy:

  • Anyone caught crossing the border illegally or found illegally in the U.S. is deported immediately. Period. There are no excuses accepted. Any assets will be used to pay for deportation. They are welcome to apply for asylum outside the U.S.
  • Shut the asylum system down. Shut down bringing in refugees. We can still allow those who want to go through the naturalization process to do so as normal, but, no longer will we bring in people who just want the advantages of being in the U.S., but, not embrace being an American. We’ve shut down immigration for decades in the past, giving them time to assimilate.
  • Any business/individual who employs an illegal will be dealt with harshly as a criminal violation unless they can show they did everything possible to verify employment status.
  • Stack up the National Guard on the border. Walls in remote regions. Visas for those Mexicans who do want to cross over for work knowing they need to go at the end. It’d be nice if we could have relations with Mexico like with Canada.
  • Any work/school visa must be fully tracked, and they must leave when it is up. No more sticking around forever, no more bringing the whole extended family over.

Of course, just because the Dems are polling this way doesn’t mean they won’t vote the same way again and again and again.

Read: Poll Shows Sanctuary City Chicago Citizens Not Happy Over Illegal Immigration »

Surprise: Matt Gaetz “Has Finger On Pulse Of Republican Base”

This is what the GOPe doesn’t get: the base has to vote for them to limit the damage done by Democrats, but, what they really want are Republicans who will fight back, who will actually walk the campaign talk

For Gaetz, Washington Drama Could Fuel Florida Ambitions

Rep. Matt Gaetz’s successful push to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy has ratcheted up speculation that the fourth-term Republican congressman already has his eye on his next target, still three years away: the Florida governor’s mansion.

Gaetz, a close ally of former President Donald Trump, has swatted away rumors that he is planning to run statewide in 2026. But that hasn’t stopped Florida’s political class from chattering. A lot.

“He’d be the front-runner in any Republican primary he wants to run in right now,” said state Rep. Alex Andrade, a Republican who represents the Pensacola area, which is in Gaetz’s Panhandle district. “He’s got his finger on the pulse of the Republican base better than anyone I see.

Regardless of whether he is or isn’t looking towards the Florida governorship, he does understand that the base is sick and tired of the broken promises from the GOPe. That they are simply slowing down Democrats, not stopping them and instituting conservative policies. Or, at least trying. Again, if Biden were a Republican Democrats would have impeached him multiple times. When they get in power they have no problem pushing their agenda, regardless of whether they control the White House and all of Congress. They will force shutdowns, hearings, whatever. They do not stop.

The US House of Representatives isn’t representative — and that’s a problem | Editorial

Only Republicans in U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz’s north Florida district could vote in the election that mattered — the GOP primary. It’s the same in the heart of Tampa Bay in District 13, where the real race was the Republican primary, won by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, or in Rep. Kathy Castor’s District 14, where there are more than three Democrats for every two Republicans. These races were effectively decided in the primary, where the voting is limited to members of one political party. This is true in most congressional districts across the nation.

Want to know why this is bad for democracy? Just review the past few days when the federal government narrowly averted a disastrous shutdown, basically held hostage to the demands of a few extreme Republican House members, with Gaetz as ring leader. We would call them representatives, but they aren’t really representative of anything but the problem with our process for electing members of the House.

Obviously, the Tampa Bay Tribune is using Gaetz, but, they do sort of make a point in that so many elections in safe districts comes down to the primaries

The numbers are even more lopsided in Pinellas County’s newly drawn District 13, which encompasses most of Pinellas and favors Republicans because it cleaves off Democratic strongholds in St. Petersburg. Luna won the competitive GOP primary with less than a majority — she got just 37,156 votes. That total wasn’t even 7% of all registered voters in her district, but it effectively secured her seat in Congress. She cruised to an easy win in the general election, thanks to a district that skews heavily Republican.

Castor faced no meaningful opposition in the Democratic primary. However, we include her district in these examples to show that the structural problem crosses party lines. There are 50% more Democrats than Republicans in her district, which helped her crush her Republican opponent by nearly 14 percentage points in November. Imbalances like this mean the representative could completely neglect the concerns of the opposing party’s voters and likely still hold on to the seat. That’s not good for democracy.

We aren’t a democracy, but, there is a point here.

We’re not blaming Gaetz, Luna or Castor. They’re just playing by the rules, which don’t work anymore. David Wasserman, an election expert at the Cook Political Report, summarized the overall problem: Only 82 of the 435 House districts across the United States are competitive enough to give Republicans and Democrats each a decent shot to win. That means in most congressional races, it’s the primary, not the general election, that matters. Since fewer people vote in primaries, each ballot carries disproportionate weight. The headline on a Washington Post column we published Monday captured the conundrum concisely — “Who elects all these clowns? As it turns out, a sliver of us.”

Reps can essentially ignore people, especially the opposition. But, the Tampa Bay Tribune is missing a big problem: each rep represents around 700,000 Americans. That is not representation. Even doubling the number would leave little representation except to big money donors, groups, and companies. They have no impetus to listen to you or me. And, once they’re captured by The System (what happened to most of those Tea Party folks?), they do not care. There needs to be term limits. I used to think 12 years, now, I’m thinking 8. (I won’t get into there being no need for Senators having term limits, since we would repeal the 17th amendment, meaning senators do the business as directed by their state general assemblies, not their parties or their “conscience”).

At least at this time, Matt, and the ones who voted with him, are think of We The People.

Read: Surprise: Matt Gaetz “Has Finger On Pulse Of Republican Base” »

If All You See…

…is a stream that will soon either dry up or flood because Other People travel, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Chicks On the Right, with a post on Rudy Giuliani suing Joe Biden.

Read: If All You See… »

CNN: Gun Violence Is An Epidemic Or Something

I wonder if CNN will disarm the security at their Atlanta office?

Gun violence is an epidemic in the US. Here are 4 things you can do today

If people want to reduce gun violence in the United States, experts say it’s important to start by understanding what we as a society are up against.

“First, it’s important to recognize that gun violence is a public health epidemic,” said Dr. Tochi Iroku-Malize, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Gun violence surpassed car accidents in 2020 as the leading cause of death for kids and teens in the United States. And nearly 1 in 5 adults said a family member had been killed by a gun, according to an April Kaiser Family Foundation survey.

Did they only survey people living in Democratic Party run urban areas, particularly in the low income areas? One in five killed by a gun is insane, especially when we’re talking a family member. I do not have one. I do not personally know anyone who has had a family member killed by a gun, except those who had served in war. Anyway, what does CNN want to do?

To prevent gun violence, we also have to stop blaming it all on mental illness, said Sarah Burd-Sharps, senior director of research for Everytown for Gun Safety.

The myth that the epidemic of violent gun deaths is all due to mental illness can be dangerous, Iroku-Malize said.

“Family physicians strongly caution against blaming mental illness for gun violence, which adds to the stigma and discrimination against people with mental health conditions,” she added.

We aren’t blaming it all on mental illness. That’s reserved for some wackjobs who go on murder sprees and those who commit suicide. But, doesn’t this mostly negate the need for red flag laws?

There are signs that someone is more likely to commit violence and recognizing them can empower communities to raise concerns early in hopes of getting intervention or support, said Josh Horwitz, co-director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions in Baltimore.

A history of violence, particularly domestic abuse, and sharing violent extremist content in social media posts are a big red flag of future violence, Horwitz said.

Living in a Democratic Party run city is certainly a concern, especially the inner cities where violence runs rampant. What about when leftists call for killing Republicans who refuse to go along with issues such as abortion and ‘climate change’? Should they be red flagged?

Safe gun storage is crucial to reduce shootings among children, Burd-Sharps said.

“Almost every day in this country, a kid under 18 — and often a 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- or 5-year-old — gets their hands on a loaded gun lying around the house not securely stored and either shoots themselves or someone else,” she said.

Gun owners should store their firearms unloaded and locked in a safe separate from the ammunition, Horwitz said.

Safe storage should be a case by case decision. I have no need for it. Many people I know with young children do secure their firearms, though they don’t secure them all unloaded and with ammo in a separate safe. That just makes the firearm worthless if someone breaks in. And, I will agree that idiots need to lock up their guns when they are left in their cars. Especially in Democrat run cities where car break-ins occur at high rates. Stop giving criminals your guns!

But, the gun grabbers really want to push safe storage. Ohio is looking to waive their sales tax on safes. Why? A locked up gun is one people aren’t carrying. Some might say it’s too much of a pain to constantly lock them up and then unlock when coming and going. Law abiding citizens are then mostly disarmed.

Much of what researchers say can curb US gun violence needs to be enacted by the government and institutions, but that doesn’t mean individuals don’t have a say.

“One thing that we can do is vote for the candidates who are talking about this issue and who are committed to ending this epidemic in this country and who are committed to supporting the kind of programs and policies that matter,” Horwitz said.

More funding for gun violence research is crucial for better understanding the root causes and best interventions, Iroku-Malize said.

Why are they assuming that citizens do not have a say? Granted, the system is not working correctly, but, elected politicians are supposed to be listening to their constituents and doing their bidding, and making the bureaucrats do the work the citizens want. Why can’t all those gun grabbing organizations spend their money on research? Because they won’t like what they find about who is using their guns for crime, mostly. It’s not law abiding citizens, and mostly not people who acquired their firearms lawfully.

We already have the research, it is called the FBI crime statistics each year. Over 80% of all gun crimes in the US including homicides are done by individuals who are NOT legally allowed to own a gun, so those individuals have prior felonies and have been arrested previously.

Other policies that matter include measures like background checks for gun and ammunition purchases, red flag laws, open carry regulations, and funding for resources such as threat assessment teams, violence interventions and prevention funds, Burd-Sharps said.

Background checks are already required for most gun purchases. Red flag laws have not worked as of yet. Open carry is against the law abiding. Leftists refuse to support stop and frisk and tough policing. Violence intervention doesn’t work in the areas and with the people most likely to use a gun for crime. California has all the background checks for gun and ammunition purchases, red flag laws, open carry regulations, and funding for resources such as threat assessment teams, violence interventions and prevention funds, yet, they continue to suffer from “gun crime.”

The whole point, though, is to foment the case that this is a public health emergency so that government can institute gun grabbing policies, much like they used COVID to lock people down and restrict their lives.

Read: CNN: Gun Violence Is An Epidemic Or Something »

Your Fault: ‘Climate Change’ Will Cause The Collapse Of Civilization

Nothing like going full apocalyptic, right? But, hey, this is all about science, not a doomsday cult. Of course, it’s right there in the headline

Doomsday author’s analysis: How climate change will cause the collapse of civilization

Yup

Editor’s note: Marshall Brain – futurist, inventor, NCSU professor, writer and creator of “How Stuff Works” –  is a contributor to WRAL TechWire.  He’s also author of “The Doomsday Book: The Science Behind Humanity’s Greatest Threats.” Brain has written several posts recently about the threat of climate change. His exclusive columns written for TechWire are published on Fridays. 

Let’s see what doom he’s going on about

 Last week we took a deep dive to see just how bad climate change has become in 2023: Just how bad is climate change? It’s far worse than you think.

The article makes two big points about the climate change situation that humanity is now facing because of all the carbon dioxide we have added to the atmosphere.

First, there are 22+ different things that are going wrong today because of climate change. The list includes:

Pure doom!

One thing to understand is that right now, currently, climate change has not really taken a deep bite out of humanity yet. Yes, it is bad that one third of Pakistan flooded last year. Yes, it is bad that New York City was flooding last week. Yes, it is bad that drought is drying up the Mississippi River, the Amazon River, and most of Texas. Yes, it is bad that 100 innocent dolphins cooked to death this week in the Amazon because of the heat. But none of these things are catastrophic. Nothing truly catastrophic has happened to humanity because of the effects of climate change.

The second thing to understand is that the truly catastrophic stuff is coming. It is inevitable. At this point it is unstoppable. Examples include:

Yup, all sorts of civilization ending Doom! Which he runs on and on about

It is as though we (humanity) are riding in an airplane, and we can see that the pilots (world leaders) are steering the airplane so that it will run right into the side of a mountain. We are sitting in our seats sipping our drinks and doing nothing to stop the catastrophe that we should all see coming. All this behavior is completely inexplicable. Why are the pilots steering the plane toward the mountain? Since they are, then why isn’t humanity overpowering the pilots and steering the plane away from the mountainside before we collide?

What will we do when Miami gets destroyed by a major hurricane? Or when a major crop failure creates famine worldwide. We know these things are coming. When they arrive, what will we do? As it stands now, we are likely to watch civilization as we know it collapse, despite all the warnings we have received.

Parts of Miami were destroyed. That was Hurricane Andrew in 1992. We rebuilt. But, this is a cult, so, doom is always around the corner.

Read: Your Fault: ‘Climate Change’ Will Cause The Collapse Of Civilization »

Excitable AOC Decries Biden Border Decision

Will she be traveling down to the border to fake-cry in expensive clothing for the photo-op? Does she not realize that Biden’s announcement is a scam, since the up to 20 mile long wall will not be permanent, but, a temporary one? That it is expected to be done in 2025? Meaning that this is all a scam which will never occur, it’s just posturing for the 2024 election?

Ocasio-Cortez on border wall announcement: President must ‘take responsibility,’ ‘reverse course’

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) released a statement Thursday condemning the Biden administration’s decision to waive 26 federal laws, which will allow border wall construction to commence in Texas.

“The Biden administration was not required to expand construction of the border wall — and they certainly were not required to waive several environmental laws to expedite the building,” the congresswoman said in her statement. “The President needs to take responsibility for this decision and reverse the course.”

The waived environmental laws will expedite the construction of barriers in Starr County, Texas, which is a highly trafficked entry point along the southern U.S. border, the Department of Homeland Security noted. The Associated Press reported that roughly 245,000 migrants have illegally crossed the border there this fiscal year. (snip)

“A wall does nothing to deter people who are fleeing poverty and violence from coming to the United States,” Ocasio-Cortez said in her statement. “Walls only serve to push migrants into more remote areas, increasing their chances of death. It is a cruel policy.”

I wonder how many illegals, mostly young men, are in her neighborhoods in SCNY and D.C.? I wonder if she realizes her own buildings have walls and security to keep the riff-raff out? That Biden is building a wall around his beach house? Oh, and that Biden is also showboating by resuming deportation flights for illegals from Venezuela?

If fences do not work, then why did she not complain about all the fences that went up around the Capitol Building and the other Congressional buildings?

Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis should send a few busloads to AOC’s neighborhoods in SCNY and D.C., see how she likes it.

Read: Excitable AOC Decries Biden Border Decision »

Climate Cult Youts Taking Their Cultish Beliefs To Court Even More

What they’re not doing is giving up their own use of fossil fuels, meat, huge amounts of electricity through streaming, fast fashion, etc

Young Climate Activists Say ‘We’ll See You in Court’

It doesn’t get more David versus Goliath than the latest case to be heard before the Grand Chamber at the European Court of Human Rights. Six youngsters from Portugal, represented by a small crowdfunded legal team, charged 32 countries and their 86-strong team of lawyers with climate crimes last week. It’s part of a wave of judicial mobilization seeking to ensure climate agreements aren’t just words on paper.

The claimants, aged between 11 and 24, accuse the nations – including all 27 European Union member states, along with the UK, Norway, Turkey, Switzerland and Russia — of failing to do enough to combat the climate crisis, and thus threatening their right to live a safe, happy and healthy life. Specifically, they argue that extreme heat and wildfire risks force them to stay inside, make sleep and exercise difficult and trigger mental distress.

A ruling from the courts is expected in the first half of 2024. And the decision isn’t just symbolic: The judges may resolve on a legally binding order for the accused countries to act faster on climate change.

Indeed, the Portuguese youth case is just one of three climate-related lawsuits that the ECHR has heard this year amid a rise in such litigation around the world. It’s a trend I’m cheering on in the hope that a few key cases could help advance action and accountability on slashing carbon emissions.

Sovereign nations are typically in the firing line: Outside of the US, 70% of climate-related cases are against governments. But strategic cases — those filed with the aim of influencing the broader debate — are increasingly being brought against the private sector, too. Even as we wait for definitive verdicts, the attention they’re attracting and the precedents they could set have the potential to influence corporate behavior and governance in a big way.

I wonder if the youts realize that if the win these suits, which are backed by and essentially created by cult groups using the kiddies as human shields, they will be forced to practice what they preach? All that fossil fueled travel to go take selfies and TikToks goes mostly away? That their cost of living skyrockets? That their travel will be limited by government and they’ll pay a whole lot more in taxes? The little morons were brainwashed by adults into working to take away their own freedom, money, and life choices.

I just wonder if Lara Williams at Bloomberg (it’s a reprint at the Washington Post), who’s cheering this cult lawfare on, realizes that it will f*ck with her life, and employment. If Bloomberg is forced to comply they’ll have no need for so many activists reporters on staff. They won’t be able to afford them.

Read: Climate Cult Youts Taking Their Cultish Beliefs To Court Even More »

If All You See…

…are mountains losing their glaciers because Other People drive fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Greatness, with a post on Josh Hawley introducing legislation allowing border states to deport illegals.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: Uber-Gun Restrictive California Seeing More Violent Gun Crimes

If you make it harder for the law abiding to get guns to protect themselves, then it will be the criminals with the guns. Further, when the government is soft on crime, criminals will be happy campers

A troubling trend in California: More violent crimes are being committed with guns even as restrictions tighten

Though overall crime in California is down from historic peaks, data from the state Department of Justice’s Criminal Justice Statistics Center suggest violent crime has been on the rise since 2014.

And experts are now noting another troubling trend: the increased use of firearms in homicides and aggravated assaults.

A spate of mass shootings, including killings this year at a dance hall in Monterey Park, a mushroom farm in Half Moon Bay and a Trabuco Canyon bar, highlight the problem.

“It is particularly in the last few years that we have seen an increase in violent crime involving firearms,” said Magnus Lofstrom, policy director of criminal justice and a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California.

In 2020, homicides using firearms increased by 40.6% and assaults with firearms went up by 29% from the previous year, according to a Times analysis of Department of Justice data.

They restrict legal citizens, they go soft on criminals, they demonize, handcuff and defund the police, and import lots of people from the 3rd World who have no problem getting violent. And, let’s be honest, a goodly chunk of the gun crime is being committed by one group of people who are being protected at all costs, especially post BLM, who are more than willing to get violent and use firearms at the drop of a hat. FBI statistics do not lie.

Criminals do not care about your laws, California.

Lofstrom did not speculate as to why guns were used more often, though the increase in crime overall during the pandemic has been widely reported.

What also happened during that time, and also created a wave of retail crime?

“California has the strongest gun safety laws in the nation and has been a trailblazer for gun safety reform for the past 30 years,” according to the Giffords Law Center, an an anti-gun-violence organization.

Which only affects the law abiding.

Read: Surprise: Uber-Gun Restrictive California Seeing More Violent Gun Crimes »

Pirate's Cove