Climate Cult Meteorologist Quits Over “Death Threats” And PTSD

Kinda funny, since climate cultists have been threatening to jail and kill Skeptics for well over a decade, not too mention taking away people’s money, life choices, and freedom

Iowa meteorologist quitting TV, cites PTSD from death threat over climate change coverage

An Iowa meteorologist will be leaving his career on television, citing harassment over his coverage of climate change and its impact on weather, he said Friday.

Chris Gloninger, chief meteorologist for CBS affiliate KCCI in Des Moines, told followers on social media this week he’s embarking on a new career in hopes of “helping solve the climate crisis” after 18 years in broadcasting.

“I am biding farewell to TV to embark on a new journey dedicated to helping solve the climate crisis,” he tweeted. “After a death threat stemming from my climate coverage last year and resulting PTSD, in addition to family health issues, I’ve decided to begin this journey *now*.”

PTSD? You do the weather, pal. The weather. That’s your job. You aren’t fighting a war. Just the weather.

If that’s the worst he’s gotten, well, waaaaaaaa! Conservatives have received way worse. I’ve been threatened many times over being a skeptic, a Conservative, for supporting Trump pre-2020, and, even a credible death threat from an Islamic jihadi group. If you’re pushing your cult on other people, trying to take away their freedom, expect people to fight back.

Gloninger never thought that reporting objective, scientific findings could trigger hateful sentiment.

“That’s the problem. That sums up the problem, that people don’t care about the facts and they get mad when you talk about the facts and tie it to something that goes against their beliefs,” he said Friday.

Guy who is probably right about 30% of the time wants you to believe we’re Doomed in the future.

Read: Climate Cult Meteorologist Quits Over “Death Threats” And PTSD »

If All You See…

…is a rising ocean battering the coastline from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post wondering if it was white privilege or Biden privilege.

Read: If All You See… »

Fifteen AGs Essentially Threaten Target Over Their “Obligations” Towards LGBTwhatever

We’ve hit the point where elected government employees are demanding that a private company carries certain products and where to place them, and in a threatening manner since they are attorney generals

Minnesota AG Keith Ellison warns Target about their ‘obligations’ to the LGBTQ community

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, D., wrote a letter to Target warning that their decision to pull Pride merchandise from certain stores encourages bullying and will embolden “hateful” methods.

Ellison co-led an open letter of 15 AGs expressing their concerns over Target pulling products in response to consumer outrage, and said they could use civil rights law to defend the corporate giant.

Target faced backlash over their Pride Month displays with rainbow and LGBTQ+ messaging that included new products like female-style swimsuits that can be used to “tuck” male genitalia.

Target also notably pulled items from “Satanic” designer Erik Carnell’s brand Abprallen with messages such as “cure transphobia not trans people.” While they were reportedly not included in Target’s Pride collection, Abprallen has distributed apparel that includes satanic imagery including pentagrams, horned skulls, and references to the devil. One design found on the apparel maker’s t-shirts and pins has the message: “Satan respects pronouns.”

And consumers were the ones who were against these products. No one would have cared if it was some base level stuff aimed at gays and lesbians. The “tuck” crap aimed at children lit the fuse

The letter warned that there are many “politically motivated attacks” targeting “LGBTQIA+ Americans” such as limiting so-called, “gender-affirming care,” a euphemism for minors undergoing genitalia altering surgeries and drugs affecting hormone levels. It also stated these communities are being targeted by lawmakers who are “prohibiting transgender individuals from using bathrooms or playing on sports teams aligned with their gender identity” and “restricting drag performances.”

The letter claimed consumers who object to Target’s recent transgenderism-related products “do not represent” American society as a whole.

Based on the drop in sales, I’m betting way more Americans are against grooming/insane products at Target than those who support it.

“While we understand the basis for this action, we are also concerned it sends a message that those who engage in hateful and disruptive conduct can cause even large corporations to succumb to their bullying, and that they have the power to determine when LGBTQIA+ consumers will feel comfortable in Target stores — or anywhere in society,” the AGs wrote. “Though we do not doubt Target’s longstanding commitment to LGBTQIA+ equality, and though we laud your intention to keep your staff members and customers safe, we fear your choice to pull Pride merchandise demonstrates that intentional violence and intimidation can set back the march for social progress and LGBTQIA+ equality, which as we have noted is already under intense attack nationwide.”

The letter closed with noting that existing civil rights law not only protects people from discrimination, but also demands “obligations” from corporations.

That seems like a threat when it is originating from a state attorney general, does it not? Especially in states which are far left and/or have far left AGs (Minnesota, Massachusetts, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Nevada, NJ, NY, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Arizona, and D.C.). “Comply or something bad will happen.”

Read: Fifteen AGs Essentially Threaten Target Over Their “Obligations” Towards LGBTwhatever »

Oregon County Sues Fossil Fuels Companies For Almost $52 Billion

Nice little shakedown they have going on. What if the companies decide to stop selling their products in the county, which includes the big city of Portland which wouldn’t be able to operate without fossil fuels?

Multnomah County sues fossil fuel companies for nearly $52 billion over heat dome

climate cowMultnomah County is seeking nearly $52 billion in damages and future costs for climate adaptation in a lawsuit that filed Thursday against more than a dozen fossil fuel companies to hold them accountable for the unprecedented heat dome event in 2021.

Lawyers for the county are moving forward with a lawsuit against 17 oil and gas companies alleging that the burning of their fossil fuel products, which leads to greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the planet, was a substantial contributor to a heat dome event roughly two years ago. Ninety-six people died across Oregon as a result of the heat dome, with the majority living in Multnomah County.

The lawsuit claims the fossil fuel companies “rapaciously sell fossil fuel products and deceptively promote them as harmless to the environment,” leading to disasters like the heat dome.

During Thursday’s board meeting, commissioners voted unanimously to declare climate change a public nuisance, clearing the way for the attorneys to file a lawsuit against the fossil fuel companies. Those include Shell, Chevron, BP and ExxonMobil — the United States’ largest oil and gas producing company, which predicted global warming as early as 1977 and also knew the dangers of burning fossil fuels, according to a 2016 Pulitzer finalist investigation by Inside Climate News.

So, all the cities and towns in the county will immediately ban the use of fossil fuels, right? No fossil fueled vehicles, regardless of whether privately owned or government, right? No garbage trucks, not police cars, no ambulances, no fire trucks, no buses, no travel for the county commissioners, at least if they use fossil fuels, right? They’ll shut down Portland International Airport, and the little ones in the county, right? How about all the shipping ports?

Oh, and how about all the thousands of products made with petroleum, such as all the clothes and smartphones and computers? Paints? Shoes? Seriously, it’s time for the fossil fuels companies to play hardball and refuse to see fuel and oils to the county.

Read: Oregon County Sues Fossil Fuels Companies For Almost $52 Billion »

Texas Sends Another Busload Of Illegals To Kamala Harris’ Residence

I wonder if Kamala invited them in for cookies and milk?

Migrant buses dropped off near VP Harris’ residence in DC

A bus of migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border were dropped off near Vice President Kamala Harris’ home in northwest D.C. Wednesday as the political battle over the Biden administration’s immigration policies continues.

The buses arrived around 7 p.m. outside the U.S. Naval Observatory. They arrived from Texas where Gov. Greg Abbott has been busing migrants to cities with Democratic mayors saying there are too many arrivals over the border to his state.

A FOX News producer says the group was made up of approximately 37 people – many of them children. Several adults were seen holding babies and toddlers. Some of the migrants said they were from Venezuela and had arrived in the U.S. last week.

Well, at least it’s not the typical load of young, unattached males, eh? I’m sure they were wisked away from Kamala’s view and sent packing.

Denver mulls $40 million contract to outsource migrant crisis response for the next year

The city of Denver could soon contract its sheltering, medical, food and security services for migrants coming from the southern border to private company GardaWorld Federal Services.

The City Council’s Safety, Housing, Education and Homelessness Committee approved on Wednesday moving forward with the $40 million contract to GardaWorld subsidiary Aegies Defense Services, LLC, and the full City Council is expected to vote on the proposal in the coming weeks. The contract would run through March 31, 2024, with the possibility of two one-year extensions.

$40 million may be considered chump change by Democrats, but, someone has to pay for that, and the cost will be born by the Denver taxpayers.

Read: Texas Sends Another Busload Of Illegals To Kamala Harris’ Residence »

Bummer: ‘Climate Change’ Could Affect Bigger Hajj

There’s literally nothing that the Cult Of Climastrology won’t involve themselves in

Ambitious Saudi plans to ramp up Hajj could face challenges from climate change

Saudi Arabia has ambitious plans to welcome millions more pilgrims to Islam’s holiest sites. But as climate change heats up an already scorching region, the annual Hajj pilgrimage — much of which takes place outdoors in the desert — could prove even more daunting.

The increased number of pilgrims, with the associated surge in international air travel and infrastructure expansion, also raises sustainability concerns, even as the oil giant pursues the goal of getting half its energy from renewable resources by 2030.

Next week, Saudi Arabia hosts the first Hajj pilgrimage without the restrictions imposed during the coronavirus pandemic. Some 2.5 million people took part in the pilgrimage in 2019, and around 2 million are expected this year.

Under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s wide-ranging plan to overhaul the kingdom’s economy, known as Vision 2030, 30 million pilgrims would take part in the Hajj and Umrah — a smaller, year-round pilgrimage. That would be an increase of more than 10 million from pre-pandemic levels.

And this is the business of climate cultists why, exactly? They can mind their own damned business and deal with their own carbon footprints.

The Associated Press reached out to several Saudi officials with detailed questions but received no response. It’s unclear what, if any, studies the government has done on the environmental impact of the pilgrimage or whether that figures into its plans. And well-intentioned measures, like a high-speed railway network, aren’t enough to remove polluting traffic in and around the holy city.

Most likely because Saudi officials said “mind your own business, chumps!” Seriously, the AP’s Raizat Butt (hey, that’s what the article says) wrote 27 paragraphs on this cult stuff.

Muslim activists have launched grassroots initiatives aimed at a “green Hajj,” encouraging pilgrims to only make the journey once, to avoid single-use plastics and to offset carbon emissions by planting trees.

The Hajj “can be green and sustainable if there are smart policies and technology to lower the ecological footprint,” said Odeh Jayyousi, a professor at the Arabian Gulf University in Bahrain who researches sustainability and innovation.

In other words, it’s yet another astroturfed initiative from big moneyed cult members. And they might want to be really, really careful lest they annoy the more Religion Of Peace folks.

Read: Bummer: ‘Climate Change’ Could Affect Bigger Hajj »

If All You See…

…are penguins which will soon die out because there’s no ice left, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Political Hat, with a post on Ireland considering jailing people who campaign against gender confused wanting to use female rest rooms.

Read: If All You See… »

USA Today Loses Mind Over Elon Musk Calling “Cisgender” A Slur

Don’t you love when you say something simply to start some stuff and people walk into it? Especially when they really start losing their minds? And it’s even better when you’re trying to make a point, and a rich guy who the news will cover

Elon Musk declares ‘cisgender’ a slur on Twitter. What about ‘fragile man with big ego’?

In the latest episode of “Wealthy White Dudes Get Their Tender Feelings Hurt By An Adjective” self-proclaimed free-speech absolutist Elon Musk has decided the word “cisgender” is a slur.

The owner of one of the largest social media megaphones on the planet issued the following edict via tweet this week: “The words ‘cis’ or ‘cisgender’ are considered slurs on this platform.”

This came as news to most people, as the word “cisgender,” according to Merriam-Webster, simply means: “of, relating to, or being a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex the person had or was identified as having at birth.”

That’s doesn’t sound particularly slur-ish, but apparently if you’re rich and childish enough, you get to call the shots, so who am I to argue?

That you’re arguing is pretty much Elon’s intention, to get you all sorts of butthurt. He’s a masterful troll.

Well, actually, I’ll tell you who I am. I’m a straight, white, cisgender man (I don’t consider any of those words slurs) who thinks Twitter advertisers and Tesla stock owners might want to check in on the increasingly weird man-boy helming both companies, the one crying “Free Speech!” while threatening to suspend people who use a neutral, broadly accepted and necessary word.

Cisgender is a made up word used as a slur all the time by wacko people who think there are more than two genders. And Musk exposed how intolerant you people are, because the same people he drove nutbar with his tweet will constantly attempt to get people banned on Twitter and social media for daring to not use the proper pronouns and such, and even punished in real life.

Musk’s latest attempt to stomp his feet and whine is a perfect example of someone who has never been marginalized creating a phony sense of marginalization so he can feel free to continue marginalizing others.

You’ve responded exactly as Musk intended, going all SJW and losing you mind. And the opinion piece continues to whine and whine and whine.

Read: USA Today Loses Mind Over Elon Musk Calling “Cisgender” A Slur »

Good News: Climate Cultists Look To Make Hospital Food Worse

As someone who’s spent some time in hospitals for a broken ankle and then a broken leg, I’ve experienced hospital food. No one would give me good Eastern NC barbecue, even though one of the great joints, B’s, was right near the Greenville hospital. The food is not great, right? Here’s how to make it worse for a scam

Hospitals put climate change on the menu

Each year, hospitals across the United States dish up billions of meals. Those responsible for feeding thousands of visitors, patients, and employees every day contemplate numerous issues, from nutrition requirements to skyrocketing expenses.

But increasingly, they also focus on another significant concern: the environmental impact of what they serve and how.

That makes sense given the role that food plays in helping or harming the planet. For example, 34% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide are food-related, according to a 2021 Nature Food article. What’s more, health care has a significant environmental footprint: If the global health care sector were a country, it would be the fifth-largest contributor to GHGs. And a large chunk of hospitals’ environmental impact comes from their food services.

This reality worries health care leaders who want to avoid contributing to environmental problems that can cause or worsen health conditions for the patients and communities they want to protect.

Are these same leaders reducing their own “environmental impact”, or, are they like most climate leaders who have massive, outsized carbon footprints? And why can’t they mind their own f’ing business? Worry about themselves, stop mucking around with other people’s lives.

Hospital leaders are approaching the issue from numerous angles, including how their food is produced, transported, prepared, packaged, and discarded. Often, they focus on three key areas: swapping plant-based food for meat, buying locally and responsibly, and discarding waste in more environmentally responsible ways.

“We look at how we can reduce the environmental impact from food at every decision point,” says Diane Imrie, RD, MBA, who oversees the production of 2 million meals annually as director of nutrition at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC) in Burlington. “This adds up to a big enough effect on the environment that if we were ignoring it, we would feel we were not living up to our commitments to our patients and to the planet.”

I’m totally not against locally sourced: I buy as much locally sourced food as possible, mostly veggies and fruits. Taking away meat? Stop right there. Don’t make the hospital experience worse. Let the patients have some joy. Or, considering hospital food, sorta-joy. Of course, what all will this cost? Because we keep seeing that all this climate stuff is expensive, and hospitals are already expensive.

But making such changes palatable to patients and cafeteria customers isn’t always easy.

“Food is near and dear to people’s hearts. If you start messing around with their options, it can be tough,” says Kyle Tafuri, vice president for sustainability at Hackensack Meridian Health, which has reduced meat-related GHGs at its 18 New Jersey hospitals by 39% in recent years.

Hackensack culinary staff worked to develop some mouth-watering options. For example, beet greens don’t simply get chopped and boiled; they instead appear in a salad with candied walnuts and a citrus dressing. Other hospitals try small steps, like swapping a 100% beef burger for a version that’s 70% beef and 30% mushroom.

Stop forcing your cult on everyone else.

Meanwhile, from Watts Up With That?:

Politco: Hospitals Turning into ‘Climate Change Fighting Machines’ – Limiting water with ‘timers for operating room sinks’ – ‘More Earth-friendly drugs’ – Reducing ‘anesthetic gas’ – ‘Decarbonize U.S. health care’

Read: Good News: Climate Cultists Look To Make Hospital Food Worse »

Riley Gaines Obliterates Dick Durban, Asking Of Women “What About Us?”

Democrats have ditched real, biological women to pander to the small number of gender confused, who are, among others, taking things from women

Riley Gaines challenges Dem senator, says rights of women, girls ‘thrown out the window’

Former college championship swimmer Riley Gaines challenged Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on Wednesday after he accused Republicans of promoting “hateful rhetoric” by questioning the rights of transgender youth.

Gaines was on Capitol Hill as a witness for the Senate’s hearing on LGBTQ civil rights, where Durbin said lawmakers need to be careful when talking about this issue.

“At this point, I’d like to remind our colleagues, our children are listening, and they are in danger,” Durbin said. “In fact, today, transgender youth are among the most at risk of homelessness, depression and death by suicide. So, when these young people who are already struggling hear politicians amplify hateful rhetoric that denies their very existence, what message does it send?”

Did Durbin ever consider that they are most at risk because they are basically mentally ill, and Democrats are pushing kids to be trans, leading to the mental illness problems?

Later in the hearing, Gaines pushed back and told Durbin he needs to think about biological women and girls who she said are at a disadvantage competing against trans people.

“Sen. Durbin, in your opening statement, you had mentioned this rhetoric,” she said. “You had mentioned that, what message does it send to trans individuals? And my comeback to that is, what message does this send to women, to young girls, who are denied of these opportunities?”

“So easily, their rights to privacy and safety thrown out of the window to protect a small population, protect one group as long as they’re happy,” she said. “What about us? That is the overall general consensus of how we all felt in that locker room.”

One has to wonder where are the feminist groups are? Why are they not out there looking to protect females from biological males in their locker rooms, changing rooms, bathrooms, showers, sports, taking away wins, taking away positions in a variety of things, having the males expose themselves to the real women, even, in some cases, violating them.

Seriously, what’s in it for Democrats? Is it worth dumping real women?

Read: Riley Gaines Obliterates Dick Durban, Asking Of Women “What About Us?” »

Pirate's Cove