Under NY Climate (scam) Law, High Toned And Fancy To-Do Communities Are “Disadvantaged”

By William Teach April 7, 2023 – 7:00 am

I wonder if this applies to Gov Kathy Hochul’s home, along with the Elites in the NY general assembly?

New York climate law defines ritzy communities with million-dollar homes as ‘disadvantaged’

New York state officials determined that multiple high-income villages that boast million-dollar homes are “disadvantaged,” opening the door for the areas to enjoy increased energy development funding.

In late March, the so-called Climate Justice Working Group (CJWG) — which consists of nine environmental justice advocates and four state government officials — released a list of disadvantaged communities as mandated under the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. Under the 2019 law, historically disadvantaged areas defined by the CJWG are required to receive no less than 35% of clean energy program funding. (snip)

However, the working group included the villages of Tuckahoe and Shinnecock, two ritzy neighborhoods located in the Hamptons on Long Island, New York.

The median home price in Tuckahoe, for example, is $4.2 million, according to the real estate firm Redfin. One home located in the village was sold for $4.4 million in December.

The town of Southampton, New York, which encapsulates multiple villages including Tuckahoe and Shinnecock, boasts a median income of $108,545, about 57% higher than the median income nationwide, U.S. Census Bureau data showed.

Good grief. Are they disadvantaged because they’re near the ocean? The NY state government people do not even have the good grace to be embarrassed by this, and do not care. They’ll be spreading some of that sweet, sweet taxpayer cash around in the rich areas, helping out big donors, probably sprucing up their homes and neighborhoods. Increasing the price of their homes.

Read: Under NY Climate (scam) Law, High Toned And Fancy To-Do Communities Are “Disadvantaged” »

Posted in Democrats, Global Warming | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Ultra TDS: Guy Who Wasn’t Even In Office Blamed For Biden’s Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal

By William Teach April 7, 2023 – 6:45 am

This really is insane. Biden spent 7 months from day 1 attempting to erase everything Trump did. Are they saying that the Biden regime couldn’t adjust the plan?

Biden review of chaotic Afghan withdrawal blames Trump

President Joe Biden’s administration on Thursday laid the blame on his predecessor, President Donald Trump, for the deadly and chaotic 2021 withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan that brought about some of the darkest moments of Biden’s presidency.

The White House publicly released a 12-page summary of the results of the so-called “ hotwash ” of U.S. policies around the ending of the nation’s longest war, taking little responsibility for its own actions and asserting that Biden was “severely constrained” by Trump’s decisions.

It does acknowledge that the evacuation of Americans and allies from Afghanistan should have started sooner, but blames the delays on the Afghan government and military, and on U.S. military and intelligence community assessments.

The brief document was drafted by the National Security Council, rather than by an independent entity, with input from Biden himself. The administration said detailed reviews conducted by the State Department and the Pentagon, which the White House said would be transmitted privately to Congress on Thursday, were highly classified and would not be released publicly.

“President Biden’s choices for how to execute a withdrawal from Afghanistan were severely constrained by conditions created by his predecessor,” the White House summary states, noting that when Biden entered office, “the Taliban were in the strongest military position that they had been in since 2001, controlling or contesting nearly half of the country.”

Sure thing, chumps. Quite a few of the military and intelligence and diplomatic folks that were there when the plan was being formulated under Trump were still there when Biden took office. Heck, a lot were surely there when Obama was president. And even Bush 43. It’s like they think Trump sat there and came up with the entire plan on his own. He most likely had little to do with it other than saying “get me a plan.” The big question here is “who was president in 2021?”  Who green lit the plan into operation in August 2021? Who fucked up the plan? Who forgot to evacuate people in a timely manner? Who screwed up the security? Who ended operations way too early at Bagram Air Base?

Here’s an oldy buy goody

Read: Ultra TDS: Guy Who Wasn’t Even In Office Blamed For Biden’s Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal »

Posted in Joe Biden | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Climate Cult Attempts To Scare The Deep South, Saying It Will Be The Worst There

By William Teach April 6, 2023 – 3:00 pm

They are attempting to scare voters who tend to vote Democrat in the first place, and have been indoctrinated into letting government run their lives

This Part of the U.S. Will Suffer Most from Climate Change

Industrialized communities in the Deep South are the most vulnerable in the U.S. to climate change, according to a new index created by the Environmental Defense Fund and Texas A&M University that analyzes climate impacts and neighborhood conditions such as poverty and health.

Almost all of the most vulnerable communities are located along the Gulf Coast from Mobile, Ala., to Corpus Christi, Texas — a flood- and hurricane-prone region with deep pockets of poverty, poor health and economic and racial inequities. Communities in Memphis, Tenn., Birmingham, Ala., and Chattanooga, Tenn., also scored high on the index.

“Black communities in the Deep South are in the fight of their lives to protect their community from years of environmental racism, and we need every tool available to showcase what years of pollution look like in our communities,” said Beverly Wright, founder and executive director of the New Orleans-based Deep South Center for Environmental Justice.

Wright applauded the new index, saying in an email that the “data is pivotal to ensuring those federal resources reach the communities they are intended to.”

Is this Science or social science? Or just straight politics? As it does not look like science.

The index is the latest in a series of new or newly updated interactive tools that rate environmental and climate risks in more than 70,000 small geographic areas known as census tracts, each with just a few thousand residents. The effort comes as the Biden administration is prioritizing “disadvantaged communities” in allocating billions of dollars in new environmental and community-building spending.

Ah, so it’s all about the free money, redistributed from the earners to the poor black folks that Democrats like keeping down on the plantations under control of Democrat run government. This isn’t racist in the least, right? Thinking that blacks are incapable of surviving without the helpful hand of government?

The new index will help “ensure that adaptation efforts are targeted to those most in need,” Grace Tee Lewis, lead author and senior health scientist in EDF’s Climate and Health program, co-wrote in a blog post.

Other interactive tools include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Environmental Justice Index, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Risk Index of Natural Hazards and EPA’s EJScreen, launched in 2015 and updated in 2022. The White House recently published the Climate and Economic Justice Screening tool to help guide federal spending on climate and environmental protection under the Biden administration’s Justice40 Initiative.

More than a dozen states including California, New York and Pennsylvania have their own screening tools, which are sometimes used to prioritize funding and protect vulnerable areas.

The most interesting thing is how they keep trotting out these studies and “tools”, yet, the people doing so mostly do not practice what they preach.

Read: Climate Cult Attempts To Scare The Deep South, Saying It Will Be The Worst There »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach April 6, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…are angry waters from carbon pollution driven Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on being disqualified for adopting for moral decency.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

Politico: “That’s not how our system is supposed to work.”

By William Teach April 6, 2023 – 10:30 am

I still maintain that Bragg did this not to put Trump in jail, but, to jam Trump up, making him waste time and money rather than campaigning, and hoping that voters will vote against Trump. Why else trot an extremely unique set of charges that make little sense and are missing quite a lot of pertinent information?

The Gaping Hole in the Middle of the Trump Indictment

The 34-count indictment of former President Donald Trump is 16 pages long, and was accompanied by a 12-page statement of facts. But nowhere in those 28 pages did Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg provide the most important information about this high-profile legal case: his legal basis for bringing felony charges against the former president.

Every count in the indictment charges Trump with violating a New York felony statute against falsifying business records as part of “a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election” by suppressing a potentially damaging story that Trump had had an affair with a porn star. Bragg could have charged Trump with 34 misdemeanor counts, but under New York law they become felonies if the falsification was done “with the intent to commit another crime.”

This is where Bragg’s indictment has done a disservice to the public and to Trump himself. Beyond a general reference to a violation of “election laws” and a passing reference to taxes, the indictment and statement of facts do not specify what “other crimes” Trump allegedly intended to commit.

Again, that would be the entire basis for raising what are essentially the equivalent of jaywalking charges, for which the statute of limitations ran out on all of them, to a felony.

I’m not alone in wondering what the exact “other crimes” are. Since the indictment was released to the public, I’ve spent hours discussing the indictment with other lawyers, including multiple former Manhattan assistant district attorneys. None of us could determine with certainty what crimes Bragg is using to bump up the misdemeanor counts to felonies.

That is a serious problem. Like every other defendant, Trump has a right to be informed of the nature of the charges against him. His legal team can’t prepare a defense if they don’t know what Bragg’s legal theory is.

I expect Trump’s team soon will file a motion for a bill of particulars, the formal method by which defendants can demand prosecutors provide more specifics about the charges. Most of these motions are a waste of time, but in this case, the motion should be granted.

If Bragg cannot provide that, well, then it should all be dismissed. Will the system act like it should? It’s already gone off the rails with a prosecutor who’s sole purpose seems to be going after a U.S. citizen for the express reason of Trump Derangement Syndrome and that he beat Hillary Clinton.

For now, Bragg seems to be leaving his options open, giving himself an opportunity to adjust his case in the upcoming weeks. That’s not how our system is supposed to work. While vagueness might give Bragg an advantage at this stage, prosecutors are supposed to promote justice, not try to gain an edge unfairly.

No, that is not. But, we’ve already seen the J6 folks railroaded, while most of the Antifa/BLM folks let go. And the list of justice being politicized.

Read: Politico: “That’s not how our system is supposed to work.” »

Posted in Donald Trump, Liberal World | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

CBS News Is Very Concerned With The Food You Eat

By William Teach April 6, 2023 – 7:15 am

It’s just nag nag nag from the Cult of Climastrology. Why can’t they just mind their own damned business? Why are they always attempting to force their beliefs on everyone else? It’s almost like this who thing is about authoritarianism

The food we eat and its impact on climate change

How we grow food, consume it and waste it may play a big role in whether the world can avert a climate catastrophe, environmentalists and climate change analysts say. One big obstacle to changing the most damaging practices is that many of them are in fact encouraged and financially incentivized by countries — including the U.S. — possibly pushing us faster toward a world that’s too dangerously warm.

“If we do everything right — if we reduce energy-related emissions [and] transportation-related emissions as much as we all need, and we don’t address emissions from agriculture, we are still not going to avoid a climate catastrophe,” said Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group.

Piss off, wanker.

The global food system — the growing, processing, transporting, distributing, consumption and disposal of food — makes up a third of greenhouse gas emissions every year. From cutting down trees for grazing cattle, to food waste in landfills, each stage of the food system creates greenhouse gases: a study published in March estimated that emissions from food production and waste alone could push global temperatures up by as much as 1.1 degrees Celsius (1.98 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century.

And we’re going to feed people with what, exactly?

But implementing new and climate-friendly practices may be costly and adversely affect yield, cutting into farmers’ bottom lines and making their crops or herds less attractive to investors and buyers. That reality, according to the World Economic Forum, has resulted in a cycle in the U.S. that rewards “the systems that are least regenerative, emit the most greenhouse gases, and result in the most land degradation.” These damaging systems, the World Economic Forum said, “are the most likely to have access to capital.”

Those would be rich folks flying into meetings on private jets and then having lavish meals, right?

Globally, leaders have agreed to dramatically decrease agriculture sector emissions. In 2021, 111 countries, making up 45% of global methane emissions, signed an agreement to reduce methane emissions 30% by 2030, and 145 countries signed on to reverse deforestation — which is mostly caused by cattle ranching — by 2030.

Do the peasant level Warmists realize that these leaders are signing said peasants up to be forced to practice this, while the leaders don’t themselves?

“When people think about climate the focus usually snaps to fossil fuels, renewable energy, and that makes sense because it’s the leading driver [of emissions], but food is this super underappreciated part of it. We eat three times a day, so it’s something that we can actually do something about,” said Richard Waite, senior research associate of the World Resources Institute’s food and climate programs.

Oh, F off. Just F right off.

Read: CBS News Is Very Concerned With The Food You Eat »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

Study Says Humans May Have Spread Wuhan Flu To Animals In Wet Market

By William Teach April 6, 2023 – 7:00 am

I’m going to take this study with a big grain of salt, as it comes from Chinese researchers, but, it makes a whole lot more sense than it coming from first bats, then pangolins, then raccoon dogs

Humans may have spread Covid to Wuhan market as raccoon dogs ‘not to blame’, say scientists

Humans may have brought Covid-19 to the Wuhan market where the virus first emerged, scientists have said, after finding no proof that raccoon dogs were to blame for the outbreak.

It comes after a controversial study suggested last month that raccoon dog DNA found at the Huanan Seafood Market in January 2020 provided “strong evidence” that the virus was transmitted to humans at the site.

But on Wednesday, the Chinese scientists released their study in the journal Nature and said there was no way of knowing if the raccoon dogs were infected. They also cautioned that the origins of Covid-19 could not be determined from their samples.

Writing in the journal, the authors, which include George Gao, the former head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (DCD), said: “These environmental samples cannot prove that the animals were infected.

“Furthermore, even if the animals were infected, our study does not rule out that human-to-animal transmission occurred, considering the sampling time was after the human infection within the market as reported retrospectively.

Remember, data suggests that people were infected with COVID19 as early as November 2019, hence why it is COVID-19, not COVID-20

But the researchers pointed out that humans had already been infected by the time they first took swabs in January 2020, so even if the animals were infected they could have caught the virus from humans.

Meaning humans already had it before raccoon dogs after the Wuhan lab leak

The team also found traces of Covid-19 in sewers, suggesting that infected humans or animals may have helped spread the virus. Previous studies have pointed out that the largest concentration of Covid-19 was found near the market’s toilets.

I wonder what the sewers near the Wuhan lab show. We’ll probably never know. But, any rational person will point the fingers at the laboratory doing research in bat coronaviruses right up the road, releasing it either by accident or on purpose.

Read: Study Says Humans May Have Spread Wuhan Flu To Animals In Wet Market »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Gen Z Opts Out Of Drinking Milk

By William Teach April 5, 2023 – 3:00 pm

Milk is great. I love milk. Tastes wonderful. Mix in a bit of chocolate Slimfast in the morning or after a workout. But, see, Gen Z apparently has a problem with milk, and it was important enough for the NY Times to write an article instead of investigating politicians and government for wrongdoing (no paywall at Yahoo News)

Got Milk? Not This Generation.

climate cowTo the marketers trying to reboot milk as a sports drink for Generation Z, Yvonne Zapata seemed like the perfect ambassador. An exuberant 24-year-old marathoner from Brooklyn, New York, she describes herself as a proud Latina runner. Her nickname is Miss Outside.

The Milk Processor Education Program signed her to its 26.2 project, an ambitious effort to provide training, gear, advice and other support to every woman who runs a marathon in the United States this year. In March, Zapata’s face lit up a giant Times Square billboard. She starred in her own video. Her portrait is one of several anchoring the Gonna Need Milk website.

There is only one problem: Zapata would rather drink oat milk. (snip)

Zapata is part of the Not Milk generation, teenagers and young adults who grew up ordering milk alternatives at coffee shops and toting water bottles everywhere. Turned off by the no-fat and low-fat milks served at school, worried about climate change and steeped in the increasing skepticism toward the dairy industry on social media, many of them have never embraced milk. Last year, members of Generation Z bought 20% less milk than the national average, according to the consumer market research company Circana.

It’s the Evil cows!

Anyhow

The campaign takes several forms. Although the science about the health benefits and drawbacks of milk isn’t settled, some studies have shown that chocolate milk contains basic electrolytes and a precise ratio of carbohydrates to protein that can help muscles recover after workouts. One strategy involves showing athletes such as Zapata that milk is a good sports drink (though the Gonna Need Milk people thought she was more of a milk fan when they signed her up).

And just tastes wonderful after a workout.

“I feel like this is another punchline about us: Did millennials kill milk?” said Rebecca Kelley, 39, a content strategy consultant in Seattle.

She and her friends drink almond milk. “I do have some old millennial guilt because I know from a sustainability perspective almond milk is not great,” she said. But she also sneaks in a glass or two of whole milk with spaghetti or a tuna sandwich, despite judgy comments from friends. “For me, it’s a nostalgia play.”

Almond milk and all those alternatives tend to be worse for the actual environment, as opposed to the climate crisis scam, being incredibly water intensive, for one thing.

But, hey, if they don’t want to drink milk, more for me.

Some young people don’t like milk because they didn’t grow up with it as a dinner-table staple. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 removed whole or 2% milk from schools, and required that any flavored milk be nonfat. This led to a genre of social media posts complaining that school milk was disgusting. The Department of Agriculture in 2018 allowed 1% chocolate or strawberry milk back into schools.

Good job, Michelle Obama and Democrats.

Read: Gen Z Opts Out Of Drinking Milk »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Food and Drink, Global Warming | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach April 5, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…are palm trees that will soon grow in Antarctica, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on Chicago changing tracks by electing a Progressive mayor who hates white people and law enforcement.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

The Charges Against Trump Are Even Weaker Than You Thought

By William Teach April 5, 2023 – 10:30 am

There’s going to be a lot said about this over the, well, next few years, because Comrade Bragg wants the trial in January 2024, right in the middle of the primaries

What’s the underlying crime that allowed Bragg to elevate this to a felony? No one knows. Bragg won’t say, so, there should be some interesting motions in the next few weeks

Bragg’s Trump Indictment Folly

A long-standing progressive fantasy was fulfilled Tuesday afternoon when Donald Trump was arraigned on criminal charges in Manhattan.

The spectacle of a former president driving in a motorcade to the courthouse and sitting at a defense table surrounded by his attorneys will long be remembered as a symbol of the poisonous politics of the Trump era.

It’d be one thing if there were a clear felony violation that is consistently prosecuted, but the unsealed indictment is as weak as advertised. (snip)

Hush payments aren’t illegal. But the reimbursements from the Trump Organization to Trump fixer Michael Cohen were logged as legal expenses. This was misleading and is potentially a misdemeanor. Prosecuting Trump over misdemeanors would be too ridiculous even for Bragg, who campaigned on nailing Trump and showing leniency to street criminals. It would also run afoul of the fact that the statute of limitations has lapsed on any misdemeanor.

So Bragg needed a way to transform the misdemeanors into felonies, which he can do, in theory, if the false business accounting was in the service of another crime. There’s been a great deal of speculation about what that other crime is, and the much-anticipated indictment . . . doesn’t say.

He states he doesn’t have to say it, but, isn’t it required that the defendant be appraised of what they’re being charged with?

Asked why he didn’t mention the other alleged crime in the indictment at his post-arraignment press conference, Bragg said the law doesn’t require its being specified in the indictment. Even he must know that’s absurd. The purpose of an indictment is to put the accused on notice of what crimes he has committed, and this other “crime” that Trump allegedly concealed by misdemeanor records violations is essential to the case; the indictment fails its most basic function by failing to specify it.

At the press conference he held after his subordinates unsuccessfully sought a gag order against the defense, Bragg cited New York election law (which doesn’t apply to a federal race), a plan to make false statements to tax authorities (he didn’t say whether these alleged misrepresentations were ever actually made), and a violation of federal campaign-finance law (although it’s doubtful the payments constitute campaign expenses). If Bragg had evidence that Trump committed state tax or election-law crimes, he wouldn’t hesitate to charge them. And if he really thought he had jurisdiction to enforce federal laws, he’d have proudly cited campaign-finance offenses as the crimes Trump was supposedly concealing.

There should be a motion to dismiss over this very lax charging statement, which fails to lay out why this can be a felony when the statute of limitations ended for minor misdemeanors, and Bragg has no authority over what would be federal charges, which Los Federales all passed on. There are so many holes and issues, that, yeah, I think this is all about jamming up Trump to make sure he either cannot win the primary, or, baring that, can’t win the general, and then Bragg would just drop the case.

And, ignore that this is Trump for a moment: this is a political witch hunt and a perversion of the US justice system.

Read: The Charges Against Trump Are Even Weaker Than You Thought »

Posted in Donald Trump, Unhinged Tools | 15 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove