Senate Will Vote On Having Inspector Track All The Money Going To Ukraine

By William Teach March 28, 2023 – 7:00 am

Before another dime is spent on Ukraine there needs to be an accounting of where it’s all gone so far. Here’s Senator Josh Hawley

Where’s all the Ukraine money going? This person can help find the truth

Over the last year, our leaders have sent a mind-blowing amount of money to Ukraine. If Congress cares about making sure that cash is well spent, they should go on record about it.

This week, the Senate will vote on my amendment to set up an inspector general to track every single taxpayer dollar going to Ukraine. Who could oppose that?

Since Russia’s invasion began in February 2022, Congress has lavished Ukraine with $113 billion in aid spending – including both weapons and direct payments to the Ukrainian government. That’s almost four times the annual budget of my home state of Missouri. And it doesn’t look like they’re poised to turn off the spigot anytime soon.

To be clear, that’s the wrong call. America needs those resources elsewhere – to stop the cartels on our southern border; to deter China in the Pacific. It’s long past time for our European NATO allies to step up and take primary responsibility for Europe’s security. Continued spending on Ukraine isn’t serving the American interest.

But set that aside. Everyone – especially Washington Republicans – should at least agree that Americans deserve to know how their money is being spent.

Astoundingly, right now that isn’t the case. Despite repeatedly asking for more funding for Ukraine aid, the Biden administration hasn’t rigorously kept track of the money. That’s right: billions upon billions of American dollars are pouring into a war-torn country without any serious oversight.

Yes, we should know. His amendment would require a special inspector general to see where it all went and track any further allocations. The big question here is “will there be 60 votes to move it forward?” Will Democrats vote for it, or all vote against? Will all Republicans vote for it, or will a few of the squishes vote against it?

Read: Senate Will Vote On Having Inspector Track All The Money Going To Ukraine »

Posted in Current Affairs | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Climahypocrite Climate Czar John Kerry Says It’s Just Fine That The Elites Are Climahypocrites

By William Teach March 27, 2023 – 3:00 pm

Well, of course he does. Do you want to give up your modern lifestyle? Do you want to stop driving, stop flying, stop eating meat, turn your AC up to 80 and heat down to 60, etc and so on? No, you don’t, and neither do the vast majority of Warmists, especially the rich Elites, who live even bigger lifestyles

Yeah, they’re working harder to enact the scam they created. Sure thing, Sparky. That was just part of a much longer interview with Ben Adler.

BEN ADLER: There are some people who don’t want to change their lifestyle. We’re going to have to switch at some point from gas for heating and cooking to electricity if we’re going to reach net zero.

JOHN KERRY: Unless somebody were able to provide that with zero carbon intensity, I mean, if you can do that. Now that’s not doable today. So yes, gas at a certain point becomes a serious challenge here. Let’s say you’re going to take a coal plant, you want to shut it and you’re going to do gas instead.

For about the next seven, eight years or so, that’s something that you could do because it’s an immediate 30% to 50% reduction in the emissions. But after that period of time, we have to meet the net zero 2050. So you’ve got to be able to reduce gas emissions also. That’s the challenge for the industry.

Kerry claims you won’t have to change your lifestyle, but, we all know that’s mule fritters, because they’re saying things will change our lifestyles. He says that Biden will throw out a ton of executive orders affecting cars and trucks of all weights, and more. They’re going after gas stoves, air conditioners, washing machines, refrigerators, and more. But, hey, no changes.

Read: Climahypocrite Climate Czar John Kerry Says It’s Just Fine That The Elites Are Climahypocrites »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Climahypocrites, Global Warming | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 27, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…is an area flooded by carbon pollution sea rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Joshuapundit, who is back, and discusses the 2 state solution.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

SCOTUS Looks At Whether Law Against Encouraging Illegal Immigration Violates Free Speech

By William Teach March 27, 2023 – 10:30 am

This should be interesting, and probably full of legal gobbledegook. Is encouraging someone to commit a federal crime free speech?

US Supreme Court examines law against encouraging illegal immigration

illegal alien DemocratThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider whether a federal law that made it a crime for a person to encourage illegal immigration violates constitutional free speech protections in a case involving a California man who deceived immigrants through a phony “adult adoption” program.

The justices are due to hear arguments in an appeal by President Joe Biden’s administration of a lower court’s decision to strike down the decades-old provision, part of a larger immigration statute, as overly broad because it may criminalize legitimate speech protected by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

In invalidating the law, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the 2017 conviction of Helaman Hansen for violating the provision, which bars inducing or encouraging noncitizens “to come to, enter or reside” in the United States illegally, including for financial gain.

Hansen also was convicted of mail and wire fraud and sentenced to 20 years in prison. He is out of prison while his appeal is pending.

Federal prosecutors accused Hansen of deceiving immigrants in the United States illegally by promising them between 2012 and 2016 that they could gain American citizenship through an “adult adoption” program operated by his Sacramento-based business, Americans Helping America Chamber of Commerce.

It’s interesting that the Biden admin/DOJ want to support the provision (I’m assuming it is Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)), as Democrats are constantly encouraging/inducing people to come to the U.S. illegally and stay illegally.

The prosecution said Hansen persuaded at least 471 people to join his program, charging each of them up to $10,000 even though he “knew that the adult adoptions that he touted would not lead to U.S. citizenship.” Hansen and his program collected more than $1.8 million through the scheme, authorities said.

In its February 2022 ruling striking down the law, the 9th Circuit ruled that it criminalizes even commonplace speech such as telling immigrants who are in the country illegally, “I encourage you to reside in the United States,” or advising them about available social services. The 9th Circuit upheld Hansen’s other convictions and ordered that he be resentenced.

Hansen should be in jail for the fraud in that 1st paragraph. As to the free speech portion, people are rarely prosecuted for it, but, we know how the liberals on the Court will vote. What will the Constitutional Conservatives rule? On one hand, you have a stringent belief in the 1st Amendment provision of free speech, and Congress did make a law. However, there is no free speech when it comes to encouraging/inducing people to commit an illegal act. However, this is usually held when encouraging someone to commit a felony, and illegal entry is not a felony, at least not the first offense. We should have the ruling by June.

Read: SCOTUS Looks At Whether Law Against Encouraging Illegal Immigration Violates Free Speech »

Posted in 1st Amendment, Illegal Immigration, Joe Biden | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Climate Cult Wants Government To Ban SUVs And Big Vehicles

By William Teach March 27, 2023 – 7:15 am

I have to wonder how many Warmists have given up their own SUVs? How about the employees at the Financial Times?

We should regulate SUVs out of existence

About 15 years ago, travelling along an eight-lane highway in Alabama surrounded by SUVs and trucks, I thought: we aren’t going to stop climate change. At least back then the problem was mostly an American one. Now huge cars have gone global. SUVs last year accounted for a record 46 per cent of the world’s car sales, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). If we’re serious about keeping the planet liveable, we have to regulate and tax huge cars out of existence.

Let’s not turn this issue into anything so boring as a culture war. If you feel an automated rant coming on about metropolitan elites persecuting ordinary folk, remember that huge cars are mostly driven by the rich. In the UK, for instance, the average SUV costs more than the median full-time pre-tax salary of about £33,000 — leaving aside petrol. Generally, it’s the rich who emit most CO?. Getting rid of huge cars is about reducing emissions first and road accidents second. (snip)

Petrol-fuelled SUVs still massively outsell the supposed big new things on the roads, electric vehicles. Even electric SUVs won’t do much to prevent dangerous climate change because they require outsized batteries, given their bulk and relative inefficiency. And manufacturing a car battery consumes as much energy as making the e-car itself.

In short, we need to legislate away huge cars such as the Ford F-series truck, the US’s bestselling passenger vehicle for 41 years running. After all, we ban other dangerous substances, and sometimes even not very dangerous substances, such as marijuana. We already regulate cars themselves in all sorts of ways. Jurisdictions from California to France have scheduled the end of sales of new internal-combustion-engine cars, while cities like London bar dirty cars from certain zones. In the US, efficiency regulations apply to the range of vehicles sold by a manufacturer. But why not limit the size and emissions of individual car models? Some European countries already tax big cars, but in a climate crisis we need more radical action.

But, see, this really wouldn’t be green authoritarianism, because you can drive around in tiny Approved vehicles

It’s true that regulating away huge cars would be a restriction on freedom. Many people want huge cars. Psychologically, an SUV is a second home. But eliminating these civilian tanks wouldn’t exactly be green authoritarianism. Even with smaller cars, people could still drive wherever they wanted, as quickly as before. SUVs hardly qualify as a necessity compared with two other big emitters, planes and cows. If we banned planes, which account for only about a quarter of the emissions of passenger vehicles, longer-distance travel would practically cease. Banning cows will become a serious option once we can deliver large quantities of cheap, nutritious plant-based milk and fake beef, but we aren’t there yet.

See?

Read: Climate Cult Wants Government To Ban SUVs And Big Vehicles »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 15 Comments | Trackback URL

AOC Stooges For Tiktok

By William Teach March 27, 2023 – 7:00 am

I wonder what they have on her? Or what they’re paying her?

Ocasio-Cortez posts first TikTok in support of the app, says ban ‘doesn’t feel right’

As a potential TikTok ban looms, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) gave her response in a unique way: by posting her first video on the social media platform.

“This is not only my first TikTok, but it is a TikTok about TikTok,” Ocasio-Cortez said in her introduction, adding “Do I believe TikTok should be banned? No.”

The New York Democrat said banning the popular video-sharing app would be an “unprecedented” move.

“I think it’s important to discuss how unprecedented of a move this would be. The United States has never before banned a social media company from existence, from operating in our borders,” she said in her video. “And this is an app that has over 150 million Americans on it.

“They say because of this egregious amount of data harvesting, we should ban this app. However, that doesn’t really address the core of the issue,” Ocasio-Cortez said in her video.

What does she want instead?

“In fact, the United States is one of the only developed nations in then world that has no significant data or privacy protection laws on the books,” she argued, later adding “So to me, the solution here is not to ban an individual company — but to actually protect Americans from this kind of egregious data harvesting that companies can do without your significant ability to say no.”

She wants massive government control over social media companies…which would put the data in the hands of the U.S. government. Kinda like what China is doing. Strange, eh?

AOC TikTok defense ripped after Chinese parent company gave 6-figure donations to Hispanic caucus nonprofits

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., was criticized for defending TikTok after it was revealed the app’s Chinese-owned parent company gave six-figure donations to the Black and Hispanic caucus non-profits.

Fox News Digital previously reported that disclosures show ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, funneled six-figure contributions to nonprofits aligned with the congressional Black and Hispanic Caucuses. ByteDance donated $150,000 to both the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation and Congressional Hispanic Caucus Foundation in December, its lobbying contribution report shows.

Jake Denton, who handles tech policy for the Heritage Foundation, noted on Twitter Sunday that AOC is a member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute (CHCI) advisory council.

“What a coincidence!” Denton wrote, responding to Ocasio-Cortez’s video defense of TikTok initially shared Saturday.

Some Democrats are in support of banning Tiktok, then you have some like Jamaal Bowman and Robert Garcia….wait, aren’t they part of those caucuses?

Personally, I’m not for a ban, except on government devices. If private citizens want to be dumb and use it, giving the Chinese government all their data, well, that’s on them for being stupid.

Read: AOC Stooges For Tiktok »

Posted in Democrats, Web/Tech | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 26, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…are shoes made of horrible petroleum, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Outside The Beltway, with a post on making cheap booze expensive.

It’s fit girls week.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 16 Comments | Trackback URL

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

By William Teach March 26, 2023 – 9:08 am

Happy Sunday! Another wonderful day in the Once and Future Nation of America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing (loudly), and the NJ Devils have made the playoffs for the first time in 6 years, and are the 3rd best team in the NHL. Wasn’t expecting that this year. This pinup is by Fiona Stephenson, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. A View From The Beach notes that coral reefs are doing just fine
  2. American Greatness highlights the FBI finding no credible threats after investigating protesting parents
  3. Bustednuckles covers Trump still drawing huge crowds
  4. Chicks On The Right has an exclusive interview with Nikki Haley
  5. Cold Fury shows people aren’t buying what Fauci is selling
  6. Da Techguy’s Blog says most military vaccine refusers won’t come back
  7. Diogenes’ Middle Finger makes the case for the Oxford comma
  8. Geller Report covers men named as women of the year
  9. IOTW Report discusses Ray Epps’ lawyer threatening Tucker Carlson
  10. Irons In The Fire covers a “limited experiment” involving mice and bat coronaviruses
  11. Jihad Watch discusses the Biden regime trying to censor private text messages
  12. Legal Insurrection notes World Athletics banning men in women’s competitions
  13. Moonbattery covers the high price of low bond for lowlifes
  14. neo-neocon says that high fat foods just taste better
  15. And last, but, not least, Pacific Pundit wonders about the difference in John Fetterman’s face

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Posted in Patriotic Pinup | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Brandon Admin Cracking Down On Air Conditioning

By William Teach March 26, 2023 – 7:00 am

Why should Biden and his Comrades care that this will spike the cost? They’re rich. It won’t bother them. The working and middle classes? Yet another hit in the wallet

Biden admin cracks down on air conditioners as war on appliances continues

The Biden administration announced its latest home appliance regulations this week, targeting air conditioners in an action it said would reduce the nation’s carbon emissions.

The regulations, unveiled Thursday by the Department of Energy (DOE), finalize energy efficiency standards for home air conditioning units, or window air conditioners, and portable air cleaners. The DOE said the move would cut air pollution and push consumer costs down by billions of dollars via energy savings.

“Today’s announcement builds on the historic actions President Biden took last year to strengthen outdated energy efficiency standards, which will help save on people’s energy bills and reduce our nation’s carbon footprint,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in a statement.

If you spend $1,000 more on a unit, and save $200, is that a win? Or, even if it’s an almost even swap, can the average American afford the extra cost upfront?

According to the DOE, the new energy efficiency standards will save Americans about $1.5 billion annually and curb carbon dioxide emissions by 106 million metric tons over three decades. The agency added that the regulations were part of President Biden’s efforts to promote innovation and lower costs for families “while tackling the climate crisis.”

Piss off, cultist.

Over the last several months, meanwhile, the DOE has introduced a series of energy efficiency regulations impacting various home appliances including gas stoves, ovens, clothes washers and refrigerators. Critics have blasted the rules as federal overreach and unnecessary given that the industry has improved technology without government intervention.

“What these mandates, what these standards do is enforce a level of efficiency that doesn’t make sense,” Ben Lieberman, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told Fox News Digital in an interview last week. “And they compromise product quality. We’ve already seen this to an extent with cost of clothes washer standards.”

The standards can make the units either too expensive for most to purchase, or substandard. All for an imaginary problem. Really, the best way is to make products that last a long time. My washer and dryer were purchased from Sears in 1994. They still work (knock on wood). Maybe they aren’t as efficient as today’s models, especially the dryer, but, a lot better than replacing every 5 years or so, right?

Read: Brandon Admin Cracking Down On Air Conditioning »

Posted in Energy, Global Warming, Joe Biden | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

WWIII Watch: Russia To Put Nuclear Weapons Back in Belarus

By William Teach March 25, 2023 – 5:16 pm

Things keep getting safer and safer, eh? Thank goodness Biden is on top of this from (checks calendar) his home in Delaware for the weekend yet again

Putin says Moscow to station nuclear weapons in Belarus, first time since 1990s

Russia will station tactical nuclear weapons in neighbouring Belarus, President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday, marking the first time since the mid-1990s that Moscow will have based such arms outside the country.

Putin made the announcement at a time of growing tensions with the West over the Ukraine war and as some Russian commentators speculate about possible nuclear strikes.

“Tactical” nuclear weapons refer to those used for specific gains in the battlefield rather than those with the capacity to wipe out cities. It is unclear how many such weapons Russia has, given it is an area still shrouded in traditions of Cold War secrecy.

Experts told Reuters the development was significant, since Russia had until now been proud that unlike the United States, it did not deploy nuclear weapons outside its borders.

Belarus has borders with three NATO members – Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

So, under Trump there were no new wars, peace was spreading in the Middle East, and Russia wasn’t getting frisky. Under Brandon, he gave up Afghanistan to the Taliban, China is getting frisky with Taiwan, and Russia invaded Ukraine and is stationing tactical nukes in an allied nation. But, hey, no mean tweets, right?

Speaking of Afghanistan

Read: WWIII Watch: Russia To Put Nuclear Weapons Back in Belarus »

Posted in Current Affairs, Joe Biden | 6 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove