The climate cult usually likes to say this quietly, not at a bigger website like phys.org
Rationing: A fairer way to fight climate change?
World War II-style rationing could be an effective way to reduce carbon emissions, according to new research from the University of Leeds.
I’m wondering if all those involved with the research are practicing rationing?
In a paper published today in the journal Ethics, Policy and Environment, academics argue that rationing could help states to reduce greenhouse gas emissions rapidly and fairly.
Policymakers have considered other schemes to reduce emissions, including carbon taxes and personal carbon trading schemes, but the researchers say these favor the wealthy, who could buy the right to pollute if trading were allowed.
The authors argue that carbon rationing would instead allow people to receive an equitable portion of resources based on their needs, therefore sharing out the effort to protect the planet.
Who decides those “needs”? The policymakers who are beholden to to the rich and powerful?
Joint lead author Dr. Nathan Wood, who is now a Postdoctoral Fellow at Utrecht University’s?Fair Energy?Consortium, said, “The concept of rationing could help, not only in the mitigation of climate change, but also in reference to a variety of other social and political issues—such as the current energy crisis.”
Remember, this is all about science.
Historic rationing policies also introduced price controls on goods to keep key resources affordable for most people. As a result, rates of malnutrition went down during World War II, despite the shortages.
A key difference between World War II rationing and the climate crisis is public perception, the researchers say. The availability of thousands of garments, gadgets and goods at the click of a button can give the illusion that resources are available in abundance, but the reality is starkly different.
How dare you peasants want clothes and gadgets and goods!
The researchers suggest that rationing probably wouldn’t be the first step. Instead, policy changes could start with stricter regulations and an accompanying information campaign to communicate the benefits of rationing.
Initially, governments could regulate the biggest polluters, such as oil, gas and petrol, long-haul flights and intensive farming, creating scarcity in products that harm the planet. Rationing could then be introduced gradually, to manage the resulting scarcity with the aim of meeting everyone’s basic needs.
In other words, the government controlling your life. Surprise! Seriously, how brainwashed do you have to be to advocate for the government to control your life? Or do this climate wankers not think the authoritarianism will apply in their own lives?
Read: Good News: We Can Mitigate Climate Apocalypse With Rationing »