COVID Today: CDC, FDA Looking At Pfizer Shot And Strokes

By William Teach January 14, 2023 – 7:00 am

Here’s the big question: will the agencies whitewash this, cover it up, or tell the public the truth if it turns out there is a big link

CDC, FDA see possible link between Pfizer’s bivalent shot and strokes

The CDC and FDA announced on Friday that their surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent Covid-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over, but said they were continuing to recommend the shots.

The surveillance “raised a question of whether” stroke risk was elevated in the 21-day period post-vaccination versus 22 to 44 days post-vaccination, according to a statement on the CDC website.

The agencies said other data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Veterans Affairs and other sources haven’t shown an elevated risk of stroke.

“Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal … represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public, as we have in the past, when one of our safety monitoring systems detects a signal,” the statement said.

The real-time surveillance system, CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, met criteria warranting further investigation into whether the bivalent Pfizer vaccine led to a higher risk of ischemic stroke, which occurs when arteries pumping blood to the brain are blocked by a blood clot.

Maybe there is, maybe there isn’t. How do we trust these agencies, especially the CDC, after all that has happened? All the BS information they’ve given us since COVID started? The obfuscation, the misdirection, authoritarian notion of forced vaccination? How much more are we going to find out about the vaccines?

Still, rare but serious side effects — which can occur with any pharmaceutical product — have arisen since the vaccines’ debut.

There is that. Think on all those commercials where they show people dancing and singing and having fun while half the commercial tells you about the side effects, up to and including death? Of course, they all went through clinical trials, and weren’t taken by hundreds of millions, often with the threat of losing their jobs.

Meanwhile

Arguments over masks aren’t going away in 2023

On a recent evening, comedian Jimmy Fallon devoted a segment of his late night talk show to launch into one of his ready-made-for-social-media ditties, this one devoted to the new XBB.1.5 variant of the coronavirus. Rendered in the campy style of the B-52s, the joking song contained a line many public health officials would like to see elected officials make with deliberate seriousness.

“Put on your mask when inside a facility,” Fallon crooned.

Crooned while not wearing a mask. Nor do his guests wear masks.

Three years into the pandemic, the question of whether to mask or not to mask shows no signs of heading toward a resolution, especially during a winter season that has seen a so-called tripledemic sweep across the United States. States dropped their mask mandates long ago; last spring, a court struck down a mask mandate on airplanes, planes and other forms of transit. Today, masking is still required in some institutions, like hospitals and theaters.

If you want to wear a mask, wear one. Otherwise, piss off, and stop trying to force your nuttiness on the rest of us.

Read: COVID Today: CDC, FDA Looking At Pfizer Shot And Strokes »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

Did Kamala Harris Smoke Trees At Her Climate (scam) Sitdown?

By William Teach January 13, 2023 – 3:00 pm

Perhaps it was the fumes from her gas stove fossil fueled flight?

The hell?

(Fox News) Vice President Kamala Harris gave a series of familiar word salads and comments during her latest appearance in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on Thursday. (snip)

“I love Venn diagrams. I do. I love Venn diagrams. So, the three circles — and you can do more! Nobody says a Venn diagram has to only be three circles, right?” Harris said Thursday. (snip)

“I’m excited about electric school buses. I LOVE electric school buses. I just love them! For so many reasons. Maybe because I went to school on a school bus. Hey, raise your hand if you went to school on a school bus!” Harris exclaimed while raising her hand.

“Who doesn’t love a yellow school bus, right? Can you raise your hand if you love a yellow school bus? Many of us went to school on the yellow school bus, right? It’s part of our experience growing up,” Harris said.

Read: Did Kamala Harris Smoke Trees At Her Climate (scam) Sitdown? »

Posted in Democrats, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 13, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…is an area flooded from extreme weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is This ain’t Hell…, with a post on AOC being right on gas stoves.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Abortion Cultists Seem Upset Over Republicans Passing “Anti-Abortion” Measures

By William Teach January 13, 2023 – 10:30 am

So, what was it that the House GOP passed? Was it a national ban on abortion? Making it a felony for a doctor to perform an abortion? What horrific, dastardly things did they pass?

Republican-controlled House pushes for new abortion restrictions

The Republican-led House on Wednesday pressed ahead with a pair of anti-abortion measures, despite warning signs that the issue had galvanized the opposition in the wake of the supreme court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade last year.

They must be really bad, putting massive restrictions on a “woman’s right to choose”, on a “woman’s right to reproductive freedom” (though, the same abortion nuts do not seem to be able to define what is a woman anymore)

Voting mostly along party lines, Republicans first approved a bill that would compel doctors to provide care for an infant who survives an attempted abortion – an occurrence that is exceedingly rare.

After its passage, Republicans broke into applause on the House floor as the bill’s sponsor, congresswoman Ann Wagner, a Republican of Missouri, waved the text of the legislation in celebration.

Democrats, several of them wearing white in protest, remained silent. However, on the measure, two Texas Democrats broke with the party: the congressman Henry Cuellar, who opposes abortion, supported it while his colleague Vicente González voted present.

The House also passed a non-binding resolution condemning attacks on pregnancy crisis centers, with the support of all Republicans and three Democrats.

Wait, that’s it? This is what Democrats and abortion on demand supporters are upset about? Having to give a baby born alive medical care and condemning attacks on pregnancy centers? I’m not so sure that it would galvanize opposition from non-abortion nuts.

Anti-abortion groups have long pushed so-called “born alive” legislation similar to the version under consideration in the House, which could carry a prison sentence of up to five years for medical workers.

Critics, including medical professionals, say such measures are based on distortions and misinformation about what is often an extremely painful and often unwanted decision to end a pregnancy. Abortions after the point of viability, which is defined as about 23 weeks, are extremely uncommon, according to federal and state data. In the rare instances they do happen, they often involve serious fetal abnormalities or risks to the life of the mother.

If it’s so rare, why are Democrats so upset? If the baby is born alive, what risk is there to the life of the mother? The baby is out.

“The bill directly interferes with a doctor’s medical judgment and dictates a medical standard of care that may not be appropriate in all circumstances, which could, in fact, put infants’ lives at greater risk,” Nadler said.

The doctor’s judgement is to let the baby die? Isn’t that against their oath?

Read: Abortion Cultists Seem Upset Over Republicans Passing “Anti-Abortion” Measures »

Posted in Democrats, GOP | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Excitable NY Gov Hochul Pushes To Ban New Gas Hookups

By William Teach January 13, 2023 – 7:15 am

Los Federales may have given up on banning gas stoves (at least for the moment. You know they’ll try again), but, climahypocrite Hochul is working it

N.Y. Gov. Hochul proposes ban on new gas hookups, to fight climate change

In the same week that the Biden administration reversed course on whether a ban on the sale of new gas stoves is under consideration, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul proposed banning fossil fuel infrastructure, including lines that power gas stoves and furnaces, in smaller new residential buildings by 2025 and in larger ones by 2028.

Hochul, a Democrat, also proposed the same requirement for commercial buildings beginning in 2030. The governor also wants to end sales of new oil or gas heating equipment — boilers, stoves, dryers and hot water heaters — in existing residential buildings by 2030 and by 2035 in existing commercial buildings.

“We know that the key to long-term sustainability — for our wallets and our planet — is weaning ourselves from fossil fuels,” Hochul said Tuesday in her state of the state speech. “We are taking these actions because climate change remains the greatest threat to our planet, and to our children and grandchildren.”

Last year, Washington state mandated the use of electric heat pumps in new homes and apartments, but, in recognition of the limitations of electric heat pumps in colder climates, fossil fuel burners will still be allowed to provide backup heat. The California Air Resources Board approved a plan last year to end the sale of fossil fuel appliances statewide, but the rules are still being drafted.

So, what of new construction in the norther parts of NY? Heck, most of NY. It does get pretty cold, So, what provides heating? Considering NY is banning natural gas power plants, doing away with coal and nuclear, where does this energy come from? What of those who use propane? Is that banned, as well? Funny how so much of the ‘climate change’ policy revolves around telling the peasants what they may or may not have.

Read: Excitable NY Gov Hochul Pushes To Ban New Gas Hookups »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Democrats, Global Warming | 22 Comments | Trackback URL

AG Garland Forced To Appoint Special Investigator On Biden Classified Document

By William Teach January 13, 2023 – 7:00 am

A third batch of classified documents was found in Biden’s garage near his Corvette, and now

Attorney General Merrick Garland Assigns Special Counsel to Investigate Joe Biden for Possession of Classified Documents

Attorney General Merrick Garland announced his decision Thursday to appoint a special counsel to investigate President Joe Biden after classified documents from his time as vice president in Barack Obama’s administration were found in his possession.

“I concluded that under the special counsel regulations, it was in the public interest to appoint a special counsel,” Garland said, noting that he made his decision on January 5th.

He announced that former U.S. attorney from Maryland Robert Hur, appointed by former president Donald Trump, to investigate Biden.

“Mr. Hurr has a long and distinguished career as a prosecutor,” Garland said, adding that “I will ensure that Mr. Hur receives all the resources he needs to conduct his work.”

The Attorney General laid out the timeline for the Justice Department’s handling of the investigation, revealing that the investigation was well underway before it was first reported on Tuesday.

Garland recounted that he was first notified of Biden’s possession of classified documents on the evening of November 4, which were found by his lawyer in his office at the Penn-Biden center.

So, Garland knew about the current president having classified documents from his time as VP stored at the center, which he was not entitled to have and had no authority to have. And did….nothing. And, let’s be honest, this investigation will most likely turn into a white wash. It’s pro-forma meant to give cover to Biden. It will take months and months, with no leaks to the press, then the findings will be quietly released and everything will be fine.

That’s not to say that Trump should have had them, but, you can Obama had them, Bush 43, Clinton, etc. As VP, there was no reason for Joe to have them. Why is the FBI not searching his homes and the Penn center?

Read: AG Garland Forced To Appoint Special Investigator On Biden Classified Document »

Posted in Joe Biden | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Kamala Takes Fossil Fueled Trip To Ann Arbor To Whine With Climate Kids

By William Teach January 12, 2023 – 6:30 pm

She couldn’t have done this on a zoom call? Perhaps she could have met them at the border, a place she’s never been

Kamala Harris in Ann Arbor: Young activists must lead charge against climate change

Truly eradicating the detrimental impacts of climate change requires activism, investment and an understanding how pervasive these problems are through society, Vice President Kamala Harris argued during an event Thursday afternoon at the University of Michigan.

Nah, it just requires Warmists to give up their own use of fossil fuels and make their own lives carbon neutral, if they think it’s so bad. Instead, they want all the taxes, fees, restrictions, and loss of freedom to apply to Other People

More than 2,000 people came to Rackham Hall for the discussion, moderated by U.S Secretary of Energy and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and university Professor Kyle Whyte.

The pair posed no hardball queries during the roughly 35-minute conversation and the trio focused little on key drivers of environmental policy in Michigan, like the Great Lakes or eradicating PFAS chemicals. Instead, the vice president highlighted the state’s ballooning electric vehicle sector to amplify the work of the Biden-Harris administration to create what she deemed a “clean-energy economy,” while acknowledging the intersection between poor social or financial outcomes and climate change.

So they both took a long fossil fueled trip for a scant 35 minute “conversation”, which means they bloviated, and took zero tough questions? What did they do next? It’s harder to know, since her schedule is not published like Biden’s. What’s the over/under that there was a fundraiser with big money donors afterwards?

“You can look at, for example, the data that tells us that some of the regions in America with the poorest air quality are low-income communities and communities of color,” Harris said.

Which has nothing to do with ‘climate change’, and, interestingly, the crappy air quality occurs in Democratic Party run cities. How about we focus on real environmental issues?

Referencing her own familiar ties to community activism, she encouraged students in the audience to use social media and friend networks to make a climate impact in their own circles.

“Tell the story, talk with your peers because the reality of it is is you all have such a charge to lead this movement. You all have everything at stake,” Harris said.

It’s so weird that none of the leaders like Kamala ever tell them to get off their asses and practice what they preach. It’s always about providing force on That Guy. And none of the reporters actually do Journalism and ask questions like “why did you take a long fossil fueled trip if fossil fuels are bad?”

Just too be clear, these little stories are important, because they do highlight how the Elites really are complete climate hypocrites. Why should we listen?

Read: Kamala Takes Fossil Fueled Trip To Ann Arbor To Whine With Climate Kids »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Democrats, Global Warming | Comments Off on Kamala Takes Fossil Fueled Trip To Ann Arbor To Whine With Climate Kids | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 12, 2023 – 1:00 pm

…are wonderful plants sucking carbon pollution from the air, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Green Jihad, with a post on Biden’s eco-crazies walking back their banning of gas stoves.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 20 Comments | Trackback URL

Say, What’s The Difference In The Books Liberals And Conservatives Are Banning?

By William Teach January 12, 2023 – 10:30 am

I’m not quite sure what bee got in the burr of ABC News and writer Kiara Alfonseca, but, they decided to take on the the book bans in a neutral manner

How conservative and liberal book bans differ amid rise in literary restrictions

The country saw a growing effort to ban books in schools and libraries nationwide in 2022, and researchers expect to see more efforts to challenge books in 2023 as some Republican-backed laws across the country aim to restrict LGBTQ and racial content in school books.

While activists across the political spectrum have sought to restrict or protest some forms of literature, the vast majority of book challenges are from conservative-leaning groups, researchers say. Only a handful of efforts have also come from liberal sources, mainly targeting books with racist or offensive language.

See, of course it’s your fault

“If you get five people and they walk through a library and they are allowed to remove anything they think might get someone in trouble for it being there — Well, they’re going to start pulling all kinds of stuff, a conservative person and progressive person,” Jonathan Friedman, the director of free expression and education programs at PEN America, told ABC News. “We all have different issues that we think shouldn’t be in books — historic representations of racism, for example, something like Mark Twain is just as likely to [be seen as potentially controversial] as is ‘Gender Queer,'” a coming-of-age memoir about the author’s LGBTQ identity.

There were at least 2,532 book challenges from July 2021 to June 2022, affecting 1,648 book titles, according to a report by the free expression protection group PEN America.

“We’re in danger of removing from libraries, all kinds of materials, some of which are seen as classic forms of literature and some of which are now in danger of not becoming classic works of literature for the future because they’re being censored in this way,” Friedman said.

Yeah, most of those are from liberals

Books targeted by conservative groups were overwhelmingly written by or about people of color and LGBTQ people, according to anti-censorship researchers. According to PEN American and the ALA, many of the challenges reference the sexual content or inherent messaging in the books.

Banned Books Lists from the ALA show that these groups have challenged young adult books such as “The Hate U Give” and “The Bluest Eye,” which discuss racism in the United States, as well as book titles like “Gender Queer” and “All Boys Aren’t Blue” which discuss LGBTQ identities, sexuality and gender.

Meanwhile, liberal efforts criticized or restricted books in the name of anti-racism or progressive ideals.

Books like “Of Mice and Men;” “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” and several Dr. Seuss titles have been challenged in some schools and libraries due to racist language or imagery throughout the years, including the use of the n-word or insensitive imagery of racial stereotypes, according to the ALA.

So, liberals want literature classics removed from schools and libraries because they might get Offended, and, really, many are uber-white liberals being Offended on behalf of blacks. Conservatives want books removed from schools and libraries for two reasons: first, because these unhinged leftist books teach young kids that everything they do, everything they think, everything they are, and all their history is raaaaacist.

The second is because kids do not need to be seeing what are in essence pornography, teaching young kids about anal and oral sex, sex between same sex in a pornographic manner (you can bet parents would not want the same taught about opposite sex, because parents did protest this around 10 years ago), how to be transgender, and all sorts of stuff that is entirely not age appropriate. Children do not need to see this. Children do not need to be exposed to this. They should not be exposed to this. Especially as it’s being done to indoctrinate children, the same as all the CRT stuff.

Read: Say, What’s The Difference In The Books Liberals And Conservatives Are Banning? »

Posted in Books, Democrats, GOP | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

Warmists Still Pretty Upset Over People Daring To Post Truth On Twitter

By William Teach January 12, 2023 – 7:15 am

In the early 2000’s, when the Internet was truly opening up, Skeptics were able to post the reality of what was called anthropogenic global warming at the time. Then the Fascist cultists worked hard, especially through tech companies, to minimize the outreach of Skeptics. They continued to work to do this with outlets such as Twitter and Facebook. They can’t do that with Twitter anymore, and it makes them mad

Twitter has always been a hotspot for climate change misinformation. On Musk’s watch, it’s heating up.

Twitter has always been a hotspot for climate change misinformation.

Under new owner Elon Musk, falsehoods about the warming planet are whipping around the social media platform at a sizzling pace, according to a study of climate-related conversations shared exclusively with USA TODAY.

The new report echoes recent research showing a surge in climate misinformation since Musk bought the company in October.

Tweets using terms associated with climate denial such as “climate fraud,” “climate hoax” and “climate scam” more than tripled in 2022, up 300% from 2021, according to Advance Democracy, a research organization that studies misinformation.

The cultists cannot prove they are “falsehoods”, nor do they even try.

“Musk has openly encouraged attacks on mainstream science with his own posts, has brought back previously banned anti-science-promoting accounts and has altered the site algorithm in a way that greatly limits the reach of leading climate communicators,” Michael Mann, director of the Penn Center for Science, Sustainability & the Media at the University of Pennsylvania, told USA TODAY.

Is it science if it cannot be questioned? If people cannot take it on?

Daniel Jones, president of Advance Democracy, says his research group also found increases on TikTok and YouTube.

“Last year, social media companies announced additional steps to combat the proliferation of climate change misinformation on their platforms. Despite these steps, Advance Democracy found that in almost all cases that the proliferation of climate change denialist content increased in the past year, and in many cases, dramatically so,” Jones told USA TODAY.

Warmists really do not like being questioned, nor will they abide anyone questioning their cult.

Read: Warmists Still Pretty Upset Over People Daring To Post Truth On Twitter »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove