Excitable PRC Senator Padilla: Republicans Have No Plan For The End Of Title 42

We’ve always had a plan: implement every measure possible to stop illegal immigration. Stop incentivizing people to come to the nation illegally/showing up at the border demanding asylum (which most do not qualify for, but, it can take upwards of 5 years to run it through the courts, and many just do not show up). Deport those who are caught immediately.

Republicans talk of ‘chaos’ at the border without Title 42 but don’t have better plan: Padilla

California Sen. Alex Padilla on Sunday pushed back against what he called “Republican rhetoric” around the expected expiration of Title 42, a pandemic-era policy which allows the expulsion of migrants on public health grounds.

“Here’s the biggest frustration for all the Republicans rhetoric about chaos at the border: No. 1, they have yet to come forward with a plan of how to better handle this scenario,” Padilla, a Democrat who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee’s immigration, citizenship and border safety subcommittee and the first Latino to represent California in the chamber, told ABC “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz.

“No. 2, they have not been willing to commit the additional resources that the departments and agencies say that they need to handle this big influx,” Padilla said.

Huh what? The GOP is the party that has been trying to put more resources on the border, to hire more Customs and Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Democrats are the ones wanting to cut their funding. Protesting them. Stopping construction of the border wall.

On “This Week,” Padilla admitted that the rollback will be a challenge and hinges in part on the funding and operations of the departments that oversee immigration at the southern border. He also directed some blame at former President Donald Trump, claiming Trump’s administration underfunded immigration agencies.

Trump derangement syndrome. Trump doesn’t fund anything. Congress does. Anyhow, Padilla sort of has a plan

Padilla told Raddatz on Sunday that “we do need to invest more in border safety and security.” But, he said, “we’ve got to do it in a smart way” in contrast with Republican calls to focus on erecting massive, continuous physical barriers. “The years we lost to the ‘build the wall’ debate was foolish,” he said.

What is a smart way? Raddatz didn’t press for answers. It really is simple: border barriers in high entry areas, lots of agents monitoring the border, and, it should be that if you’re caught you’re put back across the border immediately. If you are caught in the U.S. anywhere, no matter how long you’ve been here, you are deported immediately. This includes all the ones who overstay their visas.

“We know that whether it’s migrants — whether it’s you know, whatever the Republicans are afraid of, contraband, etc. — comes primarily through ports of entry. And so that’s got to be the first and foremost focus on border safety dollars,” Padilla said.

Funding was increased. And, hence the need for Title 42.

He has authored a number of immigration reform measures and has led efforts to try to get an immigration fix into an omnibus spending bill that Congress is currently considering.

On “This Week,” Padilla said that immigration policy should continue to be discussed by lawmakers.

“An individual, a family, coming to the border seeking asylum today is very different than the millions of immigrants who are in the United States already and have been here for years. Yes, in many cases undocumented, but working, paying taxes, raising families, contributing to the success of our economy, working in essential jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Padilla said. “They deserve better than to live in fear of deportation.”

Yeah, his idea is that if they’re here, let them stay. Which incentivizes more to come illegally. They’re supporting bad behavior.

Meanwhile

Read More »

Read: Excitable PRC Senator Padilla: Republicans Have No Plan For The End Of Title 42 »

Surprise: Climate Cult Says You Are Making Winter Storms Worse

Remember when the Warmists said that cold weather and snow did not invalidate the screed of anthropogenic climate change? And that it was simply weather? Of course, since it is a cult and it causes everything in their dogma they have blame big winter storms on heat trapping gases

Winter storms are back — and scientists say climate change is making them a lot worse

As winter storms continue to pummel much of the United States, is climate change partially — or majorly — to blame?

As with any natural disaster that relates to the weather, it is natural to wonder whether climate change plays a role. Certainly the weather this winter has been extreme, with Texans and Oklahomans being warned of potential tornadoes and Americans everywhere bracing for possible power outages (which on their own can be devastating). Winter storms mean blocked roads, damaged property, crumbling infrastructure and possibly even injuries and deaths.

The big question for both policymakers and the public, therefore, is how much of the horrid weather can be definitively attributed to global warming.

Climate change experts say that it’s not merely a coincidence — climate change really is worsening our winter storms this year, as multiples experts told Salon.

So, does this mean there is less winter weather during cool periods? That the summers will be hotter with bigger storms?

“Winter storms develop in a climate change environment: it is warmer and moister,” Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) told Salon by email. “But it is plenty cold in winter over the continent. It means snow amounts can be much greater: e.g. see Buffalo recently. They may be more intense: not guaranteed, but more developments ensue. Watch for a bad nor-easter.”

While it may seem counterintuitive to attribute more snow to the planet warming, Trenberth observed that this only seems to be the case because the general public is insufficiently informed about how climate change works.

“[People need] education that winter warming may mean more snow, not less,” Trenberth added.

Sherman Potter Bull Cookies

Read: Surprise: Climate Cult Says You Are Making Winter Storms Worse »

Democrat Denver Mayor Upset Over Illegals In His Town

Just another case of a Democrat who supports illegal Over In That Town getting upset when it’s his town

Democrat Mayor Declares ‘Emergency’ Over 0.01% of Biden’s Record-Breaking Illegal Immigration Arriving in Denver

Denver, Colorado Mayor Michael Hancock (D) has declared a state of emergency over 0.01 percent of President Joe Biden’s record-breaking number of illegal immigrants arriving in the city.

Days ago, Hancock issued an emergency as fewer than 650 border crossers and illegal aliens have arrived in Denver in recent weeks after being released into the United States interior by the Biden administration.

The influx of illegal immigration to Denver, Hancock said in a statement, has “put an immense strain on city recourses to the level where they’re on the verge of reaching a breaking point at this time.”

“It is at a crisis point right now and cities all over this country are being forced to deal with something we’re not equipped to deal with,” Hancock said.

Well, hey, don’t complain, you supported illegal immigration when it was just a few showing up in Denver. You were all in because Trump was trying to dramatically reduce illegals. Denver is an unofficial sanctuary city, but, they did pass an ordinance in 2017

In 2017, Denver City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting city and county employees from assisting in the enforcement of federal immigration laws or requesting a person’s immigration status. The ordinance also bars ICE agents from using any city or county property to enforce immigration laws.

The same year, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock signed an executive order creating a legal defense fund for people threatened with deportation, who aren’t automatically provided with free legal representation like criminal defendants.

And Hancock was all pissy in 2020 when there was a report that ICE would start operating heavily in sanctuary cities like Denver. Greg Abbott should send a whole bunch to Denver.

Read: Democrat Denver Mayor Upset Over Illegals In His Town »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fireplace that could burn evil natural gas, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on crime not being just another statistic.

It’s Santa week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another fine day in the Once And Future Nation of America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, and Christmas is just a week away! This pinup is by Karen Arnold, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. No Tricks Zone discusses an eco-wacko group calling for a moratorium on new buildings
  2. Jo Nova notes Germany is close to a national blackout
  3. Green Jihad highlights Biden’s DOE embracing critical race theory
  4. Climatism notes climate loonies failed to glue themselves to street because it was too cold
  5. 357 Magnum laughs at leftists finding out the rules apply to them
  6. American Greatness covers being forced to say trans…or else
  7. Blogs For Victory discusses turning citizens into serfs
  8. Chicks On the Right covers the NY Times unintentionally acknowledging the border crisis
  9. Cold Fury discusses being in a low trust society
  10. Da Techguy’s Blog notes Virginia banning TikTok from state communication devices
  11. Flag And Cross covers the Army opening an investigation into the animal themed bondage gear lunatics
  12. Gates Of Vienna notes Germany using snitches for anything the government doesn’t like
  13. GeeeZ has your Sunday faith post
  14. Geller Report notes the FDA saying Pfizer’s Wuhan Flu vaccine causes blood clotting
  15. And last, but, not least, LMAO discusses the $170K a year rat czar for NYC

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Surprise: CIA Director Says Tiktok Is A National Security Threat

Who could have seen this coming?

CIA Director: TikTok Is a National Security Threat, China’s Ability to ‘Manipulate’ It ‘Genuinely Troubling’

During an interview aired on Friday’s “PBS NewsHour,” CIA Director William Burns said that the agrees with FBI Director Christopher Wray’s assessment that TikTok is a threat to national security and “it’s genuinely troubling to see what the Chinese government could do to manipulate TikTok.”

Host Judy Woodruff asked, “One other question about China is their very popular social media platform app TikTok. Your domestic counterpart, the head of the FBI, Chris Wray, has said it’s a threat to U.S. national security. Do you agree?”

Burns responded, “I do. I mean, I think it’s a genuine concern, I think, for the U.S. government, in the sense that, because the parent company of TikTok is a Chinese company, the Chinese government is able to insist upon extracting the private data of a lot of TikTok users in this country, and also to shape the content of what goes onto TikTok as well to suit the interests of the Chinese leadership. I think those are real challenges and a source of real concern.”

Woodruff then asked Burns if he thinks lawmakers should ban the app, Burns responded, “I’m not going to offer judgments on those kind of policy or legislative decisions. What I would underscore, though, is that it’s genuinely troubling to see what the Chinese government could do to manipulate TikTok.”

Woodruff then asked, “And what would you recommend people tell their children or their young friends about whether to use TikTok?”

Burns answered, “I’d be really careful.”

No one was warning about this, right?

Maybe Trump was right about TikTok

Here’s something you rarely hear a Democratic senator say: “Donald Trump was right.”

But that’s what Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) is saying now, and it’s all because of TikTok, the popular video app that Trump tried to ban in the waning months of his presidency.

“As painful as it is for me to say, if Donald Trump was right and we could’ve taken action then, that’d have been a heck of a lot easier than trying to take action in November of 2022,” Warner told Recode. “The sooner we bite the bullet, the better.”

Surprise! One of my favorite sites, Bored Panda, wrote long ago that TikTok was privacy threat. Of course, that post is buried deep, because they keep posting posts that mention TikTok. Here’s the NY Times saying TikTok may be more dangerous than it looks. VPN Overview notes it is invasive and dangerous. Behind all the cute pet videos and such (along with all the stupid stuff) lies a serious privacy risk, especially with the Chinese government behind it. So many were noting well before Trump did that TikTok was a threat. Here’s Jimmy Fallon, among others, denigrating Trump for saying it is dangerous and should be banned.

When does Trump, and all those who said TikTok is a problem, get apologies?

Read: Surprise: CIA Director Says Tiktok Is A National Security Threat »

Here’s How You Can Mitigate Your Christmas Carbon Footprint Or Something

Because I know you all are Very Concerned

Climate Change: The Environmental Impact Of Christmas, How Significant It Is And How To Reduce It

Climate change and Christmas: it has been observed that reducing one’s environmental impact makes people happier
How, then, can the significant pollution resulting from Christmas celebrations be reduced?

What are the most environmentally damaging behaviors during the holiday season?

Christmas shopping, travel, decorations: the environmental impact of this holiday is huge
It accounts for nearly 6 percent of the carbon dioxide that each of us produces annually: about 650 pounds of CO2 per person between December 24 and 26 alone.

The weight of about four male reindeer.

The environmental impact of Christmas is also increasing as more and more people around the world celebrate it according to the consumerist model.

Lots of complaining in Warmist, followed by

Through a few small gestures we can significantly reduce the ecological footprint of this holiday, with positive implications for ourselves as well.

Food

Buy from local, zero-mile economy.

Cook moderate portions and buy fewer packages of sweets.

Make sure organic leftovers are disposed of in the wet waste.

Travel

Take advantage of transportation methods that pollute less, such as train instead of car.

Use public services or car-sharing, to decrease emissions per capita.

Perhaps they should talk to Biden (who’s in Delaware for the weekend yet again), Mayor Pete, and all the other Elite Warmists who take lots of private fossil fueled travel. All these climate cultists just want everyone to be miserable. And, of course, they go into how YOU can cut down on your decorations and gifts.

Read: Here’s How You Can Mitigate Your Christmas Carbon Footprint Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an ocean that will soon swamp the land, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watts Up With That?, with a post on computer models saying a 3rd of invertebrates will die by 2100.

Read: If All You See… »

FBI Was Super Excited To Censor Conservatives On Twitter

Obviously, the majority of the left leaning Credentialed Media have no interest in covering this. They’re more interested in discussing Twitter briefly suspending “journalists” who’ve been tracking the exact movements of Elon Musk, getting a little taste of what Conservatives went through

Twitter Files: FBI Kept Busy Censoring Conservatives Instead of Chasing Crooks

In the sixth installment of the Twitter Files, journalist Matt Taibbi revealed that Twitter had a “one-big-happy-family” partnership with the FBI to censor content on its platform.

Taibbi released the sixth installment of the Twitter Files document dump, which he dubbed “TWITTER, THE FBI SUBSIDIARY.”

“The #TwitterFiles show something new: agencies like the FBI and DHS regularly sending social media content to Twitter through multiple entry points, pre-flagged for moderation,” Taibbi wrote.

For example, Taibbi revealed that former Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth exchanged “over 150 emails” with the FBI between January 2020 to November 2022. Further, Taibbi noted that a “surprisingly high number” of the FBI’s correspondence with Twitter were “requests by the FBI for Twitter to take action on election misinformation, even involving joke tweets from low-follower accounts.”

The FBI’s involvement in combatting “misinformation” on social media platforms is a relatively recent development that stemmed from the Democrat narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

Taibbi said the 2016 Russia collusion hoax was used as a “pretext for building out the censorship machine,” similar to how the September 11 terrorist attacks “inspired the expansion of the security state.”

Is this what the FBI should be doing? Monitoring the communications of private citizens and entities, recommending that they be temporarily suspended or even permanently suspended? They may be open communications, but, shouldn’t there be a warrant for this? Now, just imagine, if you will, that the FBI was doing this against Democrats. How would they media, elected Democrats, and all the activists respond?

However, Twitter’s contact with federal agencies did not stop with just the FBI. Several agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the DHS, had frequent contact with Twitter about the content posted on its platform.

In a September 2020 email sent by Twitter legal executive Stacia Cardille to former Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker, a former top FBI lawyer, Cardille revealed she participated in monthly calls with “FBI, DOJ, DHS, ODNI, and industry peers on election threats.”

Cardille noted that the monthly calls with those agencies would “soon to be weekly.

The article, and Twitter files, show that the FBI shared 25 accounts they were “concerned” with over “misinformation”, after which 16 accounts saw suspensions, deplatforming, or forced to delete tweets. One of those accounts was a tiny one. Seriously, this is what the FBI is doing

In an email dated November 10, 2022, the FBI provided its “twitter contacts” with a list of four accounts they believed may have violated Twitter’s rules. Ultimately, Twitter suspended three out of the four accounts, with staffers reviewing the fourth account, “@fromMA,” for any possible violation of the rules.

Looking closer, the “@fromMA” account was a political satirist who jokingly tweeted, “I want to remind republicans to vote tomorrow, Wednesday November 9.”

That last one, which got reinstated but is behind protected status, makes fun of those on the left and right. I was permanently suspended for doing something similar in 2016. No point in asking Elon for it back at this point.

Taibbi argued federal law enforcement should have used its resources to track down child sex predators or terrorists rather than mass-flagging social media posts.

“Instead of chasing child sex predators or terrorists, the FBI has agents — lots of them — analyzing and mass-flagging social media posts. Not as part of any criminal investigation, but as a permanent, end-in-itself surveillance operation,” Taibbi tweeted. “People should not be okay with this.”

No, they shouldn’t. But, a goodly chunk will not know about it, because most media outlets are ignoring this. They should all remember that they could be next. Probably not on Twitter with Musk owning it, but, on other outlets.

Read: FBI Was Super Excited To Censor Conservatives On Twitter »

PRC Approves Road Map For Net Zero By 2045

I’m confused. If the climate crisis is such a crisis why are they waiting till 2045? Shouldn’t they be implementing net zero measures for as soon as possible? And will all this net zero apply to the Elites? Perhaps they can start by restricting all People’s Republic Of California public employees, appointees, and elected officials from using fossil fuels

California approves roadmap for carbon neutrality by 2045

California air regulators voted unanimously Thursday to approve an ambitious plan to drastically cut reliance on fossil fuels by changing practices in the energy, transportation and agriculture sectors, but critics say it doesn’t go far enough to combat climate change.

The plan sets out to achieve so-called carbon neutrality by 2045, meaning the state will remove as many carbon emissions from the atmosphere as it emits. It aims to do so in part by reducing fossil fuel demand by 86% within that time frame.

California had previously set this carbon neutrality target, but Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation making it a mandate earlier this year. The Democrat has said drastic changes are needed to position California as a global climate leader.

“We are making history here in California,” Newsom said in a statement Thursday.

This would be the board that is unelected and unaccountable to the citizens of the PRC, right? I’m still waiting for any responsible journalists to ask the members if they have all purchased EVs and made their own lives net zero.

The implementation of the plan hinges on the state’s ability to transition away from fossil fuels and rely more on renewable resources for energy. It calls for the state to cut liquid petroleum fuel demand by 94% by 2045, and quadruple solar and wind capacity along that same timeframe.

Well, hey, no complaining, citizens of the PRC, you voted for your Betters to force this on you.

One of the goals is to achieve a 66% reduction in methane emissions from the agriculture sector by 2045. Cattle are a significant source for releasing methane — a potent, planet-warming gas.

The plan’s implementation would also mean less reliance by the agriculture sector on fossil fuels as an energy source.

Which means food production goes down and prices go up. And lots of farmers bail on the state. This will all end in tears.

Read: PRC Approves Road Map For Net Zero By 2045 »

Pirate's Cove