…is horrible carbon pollution induced heatsnow, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is LMAO, with a post wondering if gringos even know what gringo means.
Read: If All You See… »
…is horrible carbon pollution induced heatsnow, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is LMAO, with a post wondering if gringos even know what gringo means.
Read: If All You See… »
I actually caught this piece Thursday while on the treadmill about 1230pm. I couldn’t hear it, but, the CNN climactivists, er, reporters, didn’t seem too happy
Their faces
CNN polling guru surprised majority of Americans ‘aren’t afraid’ of climate change
CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten was surprised on Thursday by polling data showing that the majority of Americans are not very worried about the impact of climate change.
“Are Americans afraid of climate change? And the answer is, Americans aren’t afraid of climate change,” Enten said on “CNN News Central.” “Climate activists have not successfully made the case to the American people.”
Enten said the network has data reaching back to 1989 about how worried people are about climate change.
In 1989, 35% of Americans were “greatly worried” about climate change, Enten said. In 2000, the number jumped five percentage points, with 40% of Americans being “greatly worried” about climate change.
Forty-six percent of Americans were “greatly worried” about climate change in 2020, but then the percentage dropped again to 40% in 2025, according to Enten.
The cult has been spreading awareness since 1988, ramping up the fearmongering year after year, and, yet, this is what we get.
“Despite all of these horrible weather events, the percentage of Americans who are greatly worried about climate change has stayed pretty, gosh-darn consistent, which kind of boggles the mind a little bit,” Enten said. “Granted, everything that we see on our television screens, our computer screens, the hurricanes, tornadoes, the flooding, but yet greatly worried about climate change, 40 percent in 2025, the exact same percentage as back in 2000.”
Most people realize that bad weather happens. Always has, always will. And, let’s be honest, people can only listen to so much fearporn before they just tune it out. I love watching horror, and, really, there’s very little that scares me anymore. And those horror movies are about as real as ‘climate change’.
Read: CNN Seems Surprised That Americans Aren’t Afraid Of Climate Doom »
Can you figure out what is wrong with this “news”?
The F.B.I. Is Using Polygraphs to Test Officials’ Loyalty
Typically, the F.B.I. has turned to polygraph tests to sniff out employees who might have betrayed their country or shown they cannot be trusted with secrets.
Since Kash Patel took office as the director of the F.B.I., the bureau has significantly stepped up the use of the lie-detector test, at times subjecting personnel to a question as specific as whether they have cast aspersions on Mr. Patel himself.
In interviews and polygraph tests, the F.B.I. has asked senior employees whether they have said anything negative about Mr. Patel, according to two people with knowledge of the questions and others familiar with similar accounts. In one instance, officials were forced to take a polygraph as the agency sought to determine who disclosed to the news media that Mr. Patel had demanded a service weapon, an unusual request given that he is not an agent. The number of officials asked to take a polygraph is in the dozens, several people familiar with the matter said, though it is unclear how many have specifically been asked about Mr. Patel.
The use of the polygraph, and the nature of the questioning, is part of the F.B.I.’s broader crackdown on news leaks, reflecting, to a degree, Mr. Patel’s acute awareness of how he is publicly portrayed. The moves, former bureau officials say, are politically charged and highly inappropriate, underscoring what they describe as an alarming quest for fealty at the F.B.I., where there is little tolerance for dissent. Disparaging Mr. Patel or his deputy, Dan Bongino, former officials say, could cost people their job.
So, not one named source. No actual rock solid proof that this is occurring, at least in terms of “loyalty”. Remember, this is the same NY Times which turned a blind eye, if not supported, the FBI acting as Democrat party operatives in going after Trump, Trump’s people, and Trump supporters.
But, wait, the article right below the above, which was the lead piece
Justice Dept. Whistle-Blower Warns of Trump Administration’s Assault on the Law
A former Justice Department lawyer accused the Trump administration of “thumbing its nose at the courts,” saying his former colleagues were being forced to choose between the president’s agenda and their ethical obligations as attorneys.
In an interview with The New York Times, the lawyer, Erez Reuveni, who filed a detailed whistle-blower claim to the Senate last month, shared his growing sense of alarm as he defended the administration’s aggressive deportation agenda. He said he was willing to testify to Congress or in court about what he described as an intentional effort by the administration to ignore judges and the due process rights of hundreds of migrants.
Mr. Reuveni, speaking publicly for the first time about his experiences, was fired in April after he appeared in court to defend the administration’s mistaken deportation of a man in Maryland, accused of refusing a superior’s directive.
He pointed to the planes of immigrants rapidly flown to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador on March 15, warning that it offered a distressing example of the administration’s disregard for facts and the law. The flights that took off that day also included the Maryland man, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who was initially detained at the prison, known as CECOT.
He’s a government employee in the Executive Branch. His job is to do as the current administration wants, or resign. Can he provide any illegality, or, is he just another hardcore leftist with an axe to grind, and uses his station in the DOJ to do it?
Read: NY Times Says FBI Using Polygraphs To Test For Loyalty To Trump »
I was given a $40 gift card for Regal theaters for my birthday, and, they didn’t have 28 Years Later at a convenient time, so I went to see Jurassic World Rebirth, went for the 3D version, which has nice reclining seats. Would I pay $17.95 for a 230pm showing (which had 25 minutes of ads and previews*)? Probably not. Seems a bit excessive, and might be why a lot of people bow out of going to the theater these days.
But, it was free to me, and, if you are going to see it, 3D is well worth it. The action wasn’t excessively crazy, and action was limited and shot in a way where 3D works. If you’ve ever seen the Brendan Frasier Journey To The Center Of The Earth, that worked. Beautiful scenery that makes 3D pop. If you saw The Avengers 3D, that didn’t: way too much happening, really didn’t have the right scenery.
Anyway, at a shade over 2 hours, you get your money’s worth and enjoyment. This pretty much straight adventure: the characters are meant to do something by going to an island with the dinosaurs. They go, things happen, more things happen. There’s dinos, cute, awe inspiring, and scary. The scenery is gorgeous. Breathtaking. Where they say the location is makes zero sense. Islands in the Atlantic/Caribbean do not look like that. If you know your geography you know that it had to be somewhere like Thailand, because that’s where it was filmed. That’s Ok, the scenery in 3D was fantastic.
The plot? Well, that’s pretty much it. Oh, and evil pharmaceutical company and employee (but, without trying to give anything away, are they? We don’t know if they are going to create what they say they are going to create just for the rich and powerful. Maybe they were just going to develop it and sell it for $10 a pop to everyone. They’d make a sh*tton of money doing that, too). There is no virtue signaling. No Woke. For liberals, no Conservative stuff. Nothing that will make you go “sigh”. It’s just a straight forward adventure.
So, is it a great movie? No. Is it a fun and watchable movie? One that you will finish watching and say “I’m glad I watched that”? Yes. There’s not a heck of a lot of depth to the characters, who are all great actors/actresses, but, there was good chemistry. The story just moves along without side quests and introspection. Roger Ebert ends his review with
And there are some sporadic joys here in the clever sight gags, the sleight of hand, the bait and switch. These moments remind us of the mindless summertime excitement the “Jurassic” movies have long provided, albeit with diminishing returns. But that giant footprint just isn’t as imposing as it used to be.
Perhaps not as big a footprint, but, mindless summertime excitement movies are great, right? Commando. Predator. Jaws. The Goonies. Back To The Future. Pee Wee’s Big Adventure (was looking at summer 1985). Just fun movies.
I’m good with mindless summer entertainment. So, for watchability, I’ll give it 4 out of 5 stars.
Oh, and while I’m at it, Final Destination: Bloodlines
…is an area turning to desert from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on Mamdani’s mosque calling for the end of Israel.
Read: If All You See… »
Vacation? Seriously? He was just made Pope on May 8th of this year, and he’s already taking vacation?
Pope Leo interrupts vacation to appeal for action on climate change
Pope Leo interrupted a two-week vacation on Wednesday to celebrate a special Mass exhorting Catholics to exercise care for creation, in the Vatican’s second major appeal in a week for the world to address global climate change.
“Today … we live in a world that is burning, both because of global warming and armed conflicts,” the pontiff said in a small outdoor ceremony in Castel Gandolfo, an Italian hill town about an hour’s drive from Rome where he is spending his holiday.
“We have to pray for the conversion of many people … who still do not see the urgency of caring for our common home,” said the pontiff.
That doesn’t sound too cultish, does it? And might interfere with that whole “no Gods before me”? And worshiping idols?
The new pope said the 1.4-billion-member Church was committed to speaking about the issue, “even when it requires the courage to oppose the destructive power of the princes of this world”.
Read: Sigh: Pope Leo Pauses Vacation To Whine About Climate Doom »
Rubio should sanction most UN officials
Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over ‘shameful efforts’ targeting US, Israel
The Biden-era kid gloves are off.
On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the United States is imposing sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the controversial United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Palestinian rights.
“Albanese’s campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated,” Rubio posted on X. “We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defense.”
Albanese has pushed to haul U.S. and Israeli officials before the International Criminal Court (ICC), drawing outrage from lawmakers, diplomats, and human rights advocates alike.
In multiple reports and public comments since her 2022 appointment, Albanese has accused Israel of apartheid and dismissed Hamas violence as “not surprising.” According to her July 2025 report to the UN Human Rights Council, Albanese claimed the U.S. may be ‘liable for the international crime of aggression’ for President Trump’s strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites.
Us usual, she has nothing bad to say about Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, or any Islamic extremists.
Hillel Neuer, Executive Director of UN Watch, weighed in with a statement to Fox News Digital, writing: “This is a bold and courageous move by Secretary Rubio. No UN official — in this case, a purported official, as her reappointment was illegal — has ever been sanctioned before in history. Then again, no UN official has ever been condemned for Holocaust distortion and antisemitism by France, Germany, Canada, and both Democratic and Republican US administrations.”
“She will never again spread her poison on American campuses or enter the country. Justice is served. Good triumphs over evil.”
Good
(State Department) She has recently escalated this effort by writing threatening letters to dozens of entities worldwide, including major American companies across finance, technology, defense, energy, and hospitality, making extreme and unfounded accusations and recommending the ICC pursue investigations and prosecutions of these companies and their executives. We will not tolerate these campaigns of political and economic warfare, which threaten our national interests and sovereignty.
The United States will continue to take whatever actions we deem necessary to respond to lawfare, to check and prevent illegitimate ICC overreach and abuse of power, and to protect our sovereignty and that of our allies.
Albanese is being designated pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14203.
Rubio doesn’t really say what the penalties are, but, most likely, per the EO, she will only be allowed to fly into a NYC airport and go right to UN property. She won’t be allowed to travel around the US at all. If she happens to own property, it can be seized. She may do no commerce with the US. Good riddance.
Read: Sec State Rubio Sanctions Wacko America And Israel Hating UN Official »
Research suggests that the universe circles the Earth, you know.
Research Suggests Climate Change Added Excess Deaths in European Heat Wave
Days after an intense, record-breaking heat wave sweltered wide swaths of Europe, a group of scientists released a rapid analysis estimating the extent to which climate change might have amplified the heat wave’s death toll.
The World Weather Attribution study was the first of its kind to produce a rapid assessment of deaths linked to climate change from a heat wave, researchers said. They estimate that the influence of climate change may have tripled the death toll.
Records of actual observed deaths during this heat wave will not be available for months, so researchers used historical temperature data and established mortality trends to approximate the number of excess deaths expected to have occurred because of heat. The scientists examined 12 European cities, focusing on the hottest five-day stretch between June 23 and July 2 for each.
The heatish wave just ended in what is called “summer”, and they already have a study that suggests and approximates and estimates? That’s not science, that’s politics.
The researchers used historical temperature data to determine how intense the heat wave would have been in those cities without global warming, and estimated how many deaths would have been expected to occur in that scenario. They used that information to determine how many additional deaths were caused by climate change.
The analysis found that in the 12 cities, 1,500 of 2,300 estimated heat deaths could be connected to climate change, compared with a toll of roughly 770 without its effects. The researchers noted that the cities in the study represented only a sliver of the total number of excess deaths believed to have occurred throughout the rest of Europe.
Even if true, that in no way proves anthropogenic causation, just that it is, again, a typical Holocene warm period which also has higher temps in cities from UHI and land use. What about the huge European heatwave of 1757, during the Little Ice Age? Was that from fossil fuels? How about the 1540 heatwave and drought? They were pretty darned hot.
In turning the analysis around quickly, the researchers said they hoped to draw the attention of the public and policymakers to the dangers of extreme heat.
“When people are experiencing the heat waves, and in the immediate aftermath, is when people talk about it — when people connect their experience with the scientific evidence we can provide,”Dr. Otto said. “If we sort of wade through peer review, and wait a year, then that experience is long gone.”
Then this is not science, it’s political advocacy.
Read: Your Suggested Fault: Excess Deaths In Europe From Heat Wave »