…is a horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on the Monday morning stimulus.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible carbon pollution infused beer, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on the Monday morning stimulus.
Read: If All You See… »
This will absolutely nothing to stop the “gun violence” in Democratic Party run cities like Chicago. It will just disarm law abiding citizens. And force law abiding citizens to give up their legally purchased “assault rifles”
Illinois Democrats want to act with ‘urgency’ on proposal banning assault weapons
Illinois lawmakers are considering legislation that would ban the sale and ownership of assault-style weapons —joining states such as California and New York that have enacted similar bans.
First introduced during the final week of the veto session by House firearm safety and reform working group chairman Rep. Bob Morgan, D-Deerfield, House Bill 5855 would outlaw the manufacture, possession, delivery, selling, and purchasing of assault weapons, .50 caliber rifles, and .50 caliber cartridges. The proposal comes as firearm homicides increased by 35% from 2019 to 2020 nationwide, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
On Monday, the bill will be heard during a House judiciary criminal committee meeting. Hundreds of supporters and opponents have signed up for the meeting scheduled for 11 a.m. in Chicago.
Morgan’s legislation lists more than 100 weapons that would be banned, including the AR-15 rifle which was used to kill seven people and injure 48 others during a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park. The bill also increases the age for most Illinoisans to carry a firearm from 18 to 21.
The Protect Illinois Communities Act has more than 25 co-sponsors as of Friday and is expected to be a priority for the Illinois General Assembly when lawmakers return in January for the lame-duck session or early in the regular session.
The State Journal-Register, an Illinois paper, minimizes that part about possession. Patch goes a little deeper
House Bill 5855 defines “assault weapons” and bans various semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns, magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, .50 caliber firearms and switches that are designed to increase a gun’s rate of fire.
If approved, the bill would immediately forbid the sale of assault-style weapons. People who already own such weapons would have to register them between 80 and 300 days after the act takes effect and pay a $25 fee.
After that, the registered owner may transfer the weapon to an heir, a resident of another state who will keep it out of state or a licensed gun dealer.
Does that 80-300 days mean what you think? Yes, yes it does
(WSILTV) The proposed legislation, HB 5855 or the “Protect Illinois Communities Act,” would not only ban the future sale of assault weapons, but also high capacity-magazines.
It would also raise the minimum age to purchase or own a weapon.
Supporters of the proposed law concede Highland Park’s ban on assault weapons did not prevent that mass shooting, but believe a state-wide ban could still stop similar shootings.
The bill makes it illegal to manufacture, delivery, sell or purchase any assault weapon in the state. You also wouldn’t be allowed to possess that weapon 300 days after the final passage of the legislation.
You could leave it out of state, but, you may not possess your legally purchased rifle within the state. And, yes, 2nd Amendment groups are already lining up to sue if it passes and the governor signs it. We can expect all the criminals and thugs and gangs to give up their “assault rifles” and magazines which hold more than 10, right?
Read: Illinois Looks To Pass Assault Weapons Ban, Taking Them From People Who Already Possess »
It begins. The Credentialed News media members who are also part of the climate cult are starting to do their yearly Christmas season linking with climate doom
Climate change affecting Christmas trees in B.C. and beyond: expert
The effects of climate change are taking a toll on Christmas tree farms in British Columbia and beyond, with one forestry expert saying the sector that’s already shrinking and shifting will need to adapt in the coming years.
The trees take eight to 12 years to reach the size most people are looking for, and young seedlings are particularly vulnerable to climate risks, said Richard Hamelin, head of the forest conservation sciences department at the University of B.C.
Much of the province has experienced prolonged drought and extreme heat over the last two summers, and the seedlings have shallow root systems that don’t reach beyond the very dry layers of soil near the surface, Hamelin explained.
Those same shallow roots meant swaths of seedlings were swamped or washed away during extensive flooding fuelled by so-called atmospheric rivers of rain throughout southwestern B.C. in November 2021, Hamelin said in an interview.
See, the climate is supposed to stay exactly the same all the time.
“Just like humans, when we are stressed or when we’re more tired, we’re more susceptible to diseases,” said Hamelin. “Well, trees are the same way. So all this added stress from all this heat and flooding make the trees more susceptible to pests and pathogens.”
Trees have gone through cool periods and warm periods, drought and flood, cold and warm. It’s always the same bit of scaremongering, and this time of year has them dragging Christmas into the mix.
Meanwhile, we’re at the point of
How to talk about climate change with ‘that’ uncle at Christmas
That’s rather early, isn’t it?
Stop Leaving Christmas Lights Turned On 24/7
….
You’ve probably been told time and time again the importance of conserving energy, but you might be wondering why it’s so important.
First, reducing your energy usage by turning off your lights is an excellent way to reduce your carbon footprint. Electricity generation is one of the biggest sources of carbon emissions that contribute to climate change. By turning off your lights when you aren’t using them, you can do your part to reduce carbon emissions and therefore help the environment.
Read: Oh, Noes: ‘Climate Change’ Coming For Canadian Christmas Trees »
This made all the unhinged people with #TrumpDerangementSyndrome a bit moist in the nether regions…even their male-folk
A former federal prosecutor said that the DOJ has a team of “seasoned” prosecutors who are “on a path” to charging former President Donald Trump.
Preet Bharara said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that a team of “very seasoned” federal legal investigators was assigned to investigate Trump in connection with two criminal cases and that Trump may be facing charges within one month. Federal investigators are looking into Trump’s actions leading up to the Capitol Riot on January 6, 2021, and his alleged mishandling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home.
“I don’t think they would’ve left their former positions, both in government and private practice, unless there was a serious possibility that the Justice Department was on a path to charge,” said Bharara. “And I think it’ll happen in a month.”
Bharara, a former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, said the government “generally do not proceed” in charging cases “unless you have a great likelihood of success.”
Let’s not forget that Preet has been an unhinged, deranged Trump hater from the get go. But, let’s say he’s correct: what will this do to the country? Think it will get even more divided? Think this will set a precedent to go after all ex-presidents? Don’t forget, the unhinged left wanted to prosecute Bush and everyone around him both during and after his terms. There were plenty of reasons to go after Obama, but, that would be unwise politically. But, now, Democrats want to turn the amp up to 11, and criminalize opposition to their agenda.
Read: Preet Bharara Says Trump Could Face Charges Within A Month Or Something »
Funny Stuff
LOL. Cheney and/or Kinzinger running? Is it possible to get less than 0%? https://t.co/isiB2OW0Mj
— William Teach2 ??????? #refuseresist (@WTeach2) December 11, 2022
Like they have a shot in hell. They’ll probably do worse than Kamala Harris did
Two which are missing are Texas Gov Greg Abbott and outgoing Arizona Gov Doug Ducey. Both could be big sleepers if they run. Ducey might not be super Conservative, but, he is reliable, well spoken, doesn’t back down, and appeals to Independents, squishy Republicans, squishy Democrats.
Read: Who Could Be Running In The GOP Primaries Besides Trump? »
…is a wonderful gondola system which should replace fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny, with a post on quick hits on wisdom, knowledge, and snark.
Clearing out the folder week.
Read: If All You See… »
Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once And Future Nation of America. The feel of winter is in the air, my Devils are still tops, and Christmas is fast approaching. This pinup is by Edward Runci, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your Pinups for Vets calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me. I’ve also mostly alphabetized them, makes it easier scrolling the feedreader
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?
Two great sites for getting news links are Liberty Daily and Whatafinger.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
There have been plenty of wackos on social media playing the race card over this. I had a conversation the other day, which this other person started, that went they same way. They couldn’t provide a rational for trading Griner (who hates America, but, was still being over charged and used as a pawn) for the Merchant Of Death and forgetting to demand the release of retired U.S. Marine Paul Whelan, so, got loud, wouldn’t stop talking so he could listen, then accused me of raaaaacism. That’s all they have. And now we have the NY Times Jonathan Weisman and Ken Bensinger trying it (free at Yahoo News)
Blowback Over Griner’s Release Exposes Depth of America’s Divisions
There was a time when the release of American citizens who had been unjustly imprisoned by a foreign adversary was a moment for bipartisan relief and celebration: the 2018 return of three men from North Korea, secured by President Donald Trump, or the 1991 freeing of Terry Anderson, an American journalist, after years of captivity in Lebanon.
Those moments felt like sepia-toned artifacts Friday as Brittney Griner, the women’s basketball star, slipped quietly into a military base in Texas for evaluation following her release from Russia, while a Fox News reporter peppered White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre with pointed questions about an exchange that he said had sent the “Merchant of Death” to Russia for a “professional athlete.”
Within hours of Griner’s release, much of the right wing was in full outrage mode, seizing upon both the man Griner had been exchanged for — Viktor Bout, a notorious Russian arms merchant serving time, in part, for endangering American lives — and the Biden administration’s failure to secure the release as well, or instead, of a former Marine, Paul Whelan, who has languished in a Russian prison since his 2018 arrest on espionage charges.
This is not in the opinion section, mind you, but, the US politics section
A considerable amount of attention was also paid to who Griner is: a Black woman, a celebrity, a married lesbian and, though it had gone largely unnoticed until now, an assertive liberal — one who, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, called to stop playing the national anthem at her team’s basketball games.
No one cares that she’s black or a lesbian. They do care that she hates America, and that Whelan was left behind. Really, the Biden admin didn’t even try.
Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, who hopes to be speaker in the Republican-controlled House next year, touched on that when he appeared on Fox News to condemn the “trumped-up charge” against Griner but to say that the exchange with Bout had “made us weaker.” He added, “It’s made Putin stronger, and it’s made Americans more vulnerable.”
But Griner’s case has gone beyond such calculations, into the fraught arenas of race, gender and sexual orientation, and at a time of make-no-concessions partisanship, when large swaths of the American public are steeped in the grievance politics and adversary demonization of Trump and his acolytes.
Only in the minds of leftwing lunatic moonbats who see everything in terms of Identity. They do not see individuals, they see Interest Groups, especially on race and sexual identity. Now, imagine that it was Trump exchanging Griner for a notorious arms dealer (the article seriously undersells the danger of this guy): how would the Paper Of Record treat this really, really, really bad trade? It may not be as bad as the Red Sox trading Babe Ruth for some cash for a play. Maybe Steve Young to San Fran for a 2nd and a 4th round?
And, really, the Times cannot offer any proof that Republicans were freaking about her being black or a lesbian. It’s all in their heads. And it just annoys the ever living shit out of me that these people try this.
Read: NY Times Cries Raaaaacism Over Criticism Of Biden Trading Griner For Merchant Of Death »
…is a horrible bag denoting buying stuff that you don’t need which is bad for the climate, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Jo Nova, with a post on a big windfarm that can only operate half the year.
Doubleshot below the fold, check out American Greatness, with a post on Biden’s nonbinary lunatic nuclear waste guru charged with stealing from another airport.
Read: If All You See… »
There’s a couple problems with making these films. First, those highbrow films aren’t really that good. They’re no better than lots of independent films that end up going right to streaming. Although, some of those low budget indies are actually good. They’re just missing that certain something (sometimes it’s money, sometimes experience, maybe something else) that makes them great. Second, they tend to be subjects that only attract a small number of people who are interested, and, only a portion of them will show up. Third, there aren’t all that many truly great films being made.
Take 2000. You had a sort of artsy film like “Oh, Brother, Where Art Thou?” A damned good film in “Remember The Titans”. And then blockbusters, like Gladiator, X-Men, and Castaway. There were more than plenty to get people to the theaters. Nowadays, there aren’t many of those really good movies nor blockbusters
Highbrow Films Aimed at Winning Oscars Are Losing Audiences
A year ago, Hollywood watched in despair as Oscar-oriented films like “Licorice Pizza” and “Nightmare Alley” flatlined at the box office. The day seemed to have finally arrived when prestige films were no longer viable in theaters and streaming had forever altered cinema.
But studios held out hope, deciding that November 2022 would give a more accurate reading of the marketplace. By then, the coronavirus would not be such a complicating factor. This fall would be a “last stand,” as some put it, a chance to show that more than superheroes and sequels could succeed.
One after another, films for grown-ups have failed to find an audience big enough to justify their cost. “Armageddon Time” cost roughly $30 million to make and market and collected $1.9 million at the North American box office. “Tár” cost at least $35 million, including marketing; ticket sales total $5.3 million. Universal spent around $55 million to make and market “She Said,” which also took in $5.3 million. “Devotion” cost well over $100 million and has generated $14 million in ticket sales.
What is going on?
The problem is not quality; reviews have been exceptional. Rather, “people have grown comfortable watching these movies at home,” said David A. Gross, a film consultant who publishes a newsletter on box office numbers.
The NY Times article actually avoids the main problem: they are mostly not making films that people really care about. Even small ones for limited audiences. And they tend to over-add their messages to them, so, they are no longer fun. Godzilla is one of the greatest monster movies of all time, and it was certainly a message about the dangers of nuclear weapons testing. It was subtle, using a platform of “damn, that was a fun and great movie.” Nowadays they’re as subtle as a punch to the nads.
This is about more than money. Hollywood sees the shift as an affront to its identity. Film power players have long clung to the fantasy that the cultural world revolves around them, as if it were 1940. But that delusion is hard to sustain when their lone measuring stick — bodies in seats — reveals that the masses can’t be bothered to come watch the films that they prize most. Hollywood equates this with cultural irrelevancy.
Without the really great films, you won’t be able to do the artsy films. How many are willing to pay to see a lot of what are supposed to be blockbusters? I think people are tired of the constant superhero films. That’s about all we get. That’s not to say there aren’t some really good ones. There are. A goodly chunk seem to be on streaming. But, many of those do not have that certain something to make them memorable. Something you’d watch again and again. That you’d buy on DVD or download. Those which are supposed to be blockbusters, such as Black Adam, just aren’t that good. John Nolte makes a good point
The pattern of failure here is not just woketardery. If you look at the stunning failure of Lady Ghostbusters, Bros., In the Heights, and Woke Side Story, and the underperformance of Wakanda Forever, what you have here is one box office failure after another (I could name a dozen more) that is selling itself as a story about identity rather than character. (snip)
The world didn’t spend $5 billion to see Johnny Depp prance around as a pirate in one excellent, one okay, and three pretty bad movies because he’s white. The attraction was Captain Jack Sparrow, one of the most enjoyable characters created in the last 20 years.
There’s many an actor or actress that seem more like themselves than diving into a character. If you saw a Peter Sellers film, you saw him fall into a character. If you see Dwayne Johnson, it’s just “The Rock being The Rock”, as one review for Jungle Cruise mentioned. Ryan Reynolds is going the same way.
Ask 10 different specialty film executives to explain the box office, and you will get 10 different answers. There have been too many dramas in theaters lately, resulting in cannibalization; there have been too few, leaving audiences to look for options on streaming services. Everyone has been busy watching the World Cup on television. No, it’s television dramas like “The Crown” that have undercut these films.
Too many dramas with Woke, with Race, with Sexual Orientation, ones that patronize the audience, that are written in a way that people just lose the flow of the movie. The few horror in theaters, seem to be retreads. Or just bad. Halloween Ends? Terrible. Where’s the great science fiction? Yes, streaming is affecting the box office. With streaming, they can often do longer shows, rather than several multi-hour movies, and delve deep. Without streaming, would something like Amazon’s “Forever War” done well in the theaters? Probably so.
Others continue to advocate patience. Gross pointed out that “The Fabelmans” will roll into more theaters over the next month, hoping to capitalize on awards buzz — it is a front-runner for the 2023 best picture Oscar — and the end-of-year holidays. Damien Chazelle’s “Babylon,” a drug-and-sex-induced fever dream about early Hollywood, is scheduled for wide release Dec. 23.
“I think movies are going to come back,” Spielberg recently told The New York Times. “I really do.”
Does anyone even know what Babylon is about, if they’ve seen the commercials? I don’t. If I have to get on the ‘net to look it up, your advertising is a fail, so, why would I go? And it sounds rather dumb. A film-maker doing an indulgence film. And will probably crash and burn. I love films. I can look up and see a shelf with dozens of DVDs. And a cabinet with maybe a hundred more. And another which has more, along with a bunch of VHS tapes. And a box in the attic with lots more VHS. I used to go to the actual theater 5-10 times a year. There’s nothing these days that would get me in there. There’s a few released for streaming that would if they were theater only releases. Not that many, though.
Just make better movies. Look at the latest Top Gun. Simply meant to entertain. Was the original Friday the 13th a great film? No. It was good. It was damned fun. Entertaining. Something people could watch many times. That’s what’s being missed. It doesn’t matter if the reviewers and a small number of people think a movie has “quality.” It matters if the money paying audience wants to see, goes to see it, enjoys themselves, and tells their friends to see it.
Read: Hollywood Seems Surprised That Highbrow Films Meant To Win Oscars Don’t Do Well »