Seriously, these people are nuts. The meaning of the word goes back thousands of years, in meaning, and to the middle ages for the German and English words
California University will no longer use the word ‘field’ over racist ‘connotations’
The University of Southern California’s School of Social Work will no longer use the word “field” because it “may have connotations for descendants of slavery and immigrant workers that are not benign,” according to a letter from the department.
USC’s Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work will make the change in order to ensure the use of “inclusive language and practice,” according to the letter.
“Specifically, we have decided to remove the term ‘field’ from our curriculum and practice and replace it with ‘practicum,'” the letter said. “This change supports anti-racist social work practice by replacing language that would be considered anti-Black or anti-immigrant in favor of inclusive language.”
“Language can be powerful, and phrases such as ‘going into the field’ or ‘field work’ maybe have connotations for descendants of slavery and immigrant workers that are not benign,” the letter continued.
The goal of the change was to “to honor and acknowledge inclusion and reject white supremacy, anti-immigrant and anti-blackness ideologies,” according to the letter.
I wonder if these people bothered to ask any blacks or illegal aliens if the word bothers them? Overall, the faculty for the School of Social Work is pretty darned white. Seems rather racist/bigoted for them to make this assumption, wouldn’t you say?
Additionally, the USC’s School of Social Work states that the “bedrock” of its values and principles is “to work together to train social work students today who understand and embody social and racial justice.”
So, their values and principles is to patronize all the black and brown folks that they think are going to be the primary recipients of their work? Huh.
Read: California University Bans Use Of Word “Field” Over Raaaaacist Connotations »