…is a horrible suburban pool made with Evil concrete, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on yet another failed climate cult prognostication.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible suburban pool made with Evil concrete, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on yet another failed climate cult prognostication.
Read: If All You See… »
Well, nothing that wasn’t expected, because why would the Department of Justice want to be transparent and accountable?
DOJ appeals special master ruling in Trump documents probe
The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday filed a notice of intent to appeal a ruling by a judge granting former President Trump’s request for a special master, asking the judge to partially stay a ruling blocking them from accessing the classified materials seized during a search of his home.
“Without a stay, the government and public also will suffer irreparable harm from the undue delay to the criminal investigation,” the DOJ writes in its filing.
“Any delay poses significant concerns in the context of an investigation into the mishandling of classified records.”
The motion for a partial stay would allow the government to continue its review of the classified records recovered from Trump’s home, removing from review by a yet-to-be-appointed third-party special master some 100 documents of roughly 10,000 taken in the Aug. 8 search.
In case they’ve forgotten, citizens, even Donald Trump, have rights. If there’s a criminal probe, then the DOJ needs to say what it is. If it was so important, why did they wait months and months to ask for the search warrant, and why did it take them days to do the search after the extremely broad warrant was given? If it was about the documents, why did they search Melania’s wardrobe and Barron’s bedroom? Why did they take documents not related to those they knew were in that storage area, like tax documents, private communications with his lawyers, and his passports?
But the bulk of the argument for a partial stay of her ruling granting a special master relies on the impact her decision could have on national security.
Cannon allowed an intelligence community-led review of the documents to continue so that national security leaders could work to mitigate any fallout from the mishandling of records.
How so? They were simply documents. Nothing was happening, and there’s probably nothing that Trump doesn’t know about already. The same DOJ blew off Hillary Clinton’s handling of national security documents, which were being transmitted through email in violation of national security law, allowing friendly and un-friendly nations to read them.
What this is all about, most likely, is looking to protect the documents related to Crossfire Hurricane and other Russia Russia Russia investigations, if the rumors are true. The same FBI unit that was involved in that shady investigation is involved with the raid.
Kash Patel, former Chief of Staff to the Acting US Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration did an appearance on Monday on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” where they talked about the FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, including the release of the mostly redacted affidavit. The amount of redactions in the affidavit made it an insult to release it.
During the segment, Patel told Tucker that the real reason the FBI did the raid was to block the disclosure of declassified Spygate documents, the Obama administration’s FBI’s Operation Crossfire Hurricane documents that incriminate the FBI, DOJ, Department of Defense, and the intelligence community when Obama interfered in the 2016 presidential election to stop Donald Trump from beating his Democrat opponent Hillary Clinton.
And they knew those were the documents sitting in the stored location at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wrote a presidential memorandum on declassifying all of the Crossfire Hurricane documents.
It has the ring of truth.
Read: DOJ Upset Over Special Master Ruling, Files Intent To Appeal »
The best part is the subhead of this Science article which is devoid of science
Just a small rise in Earth’s temperature could cause irreversible ecosystem and weather changes
Scientists call for forecasting teams to join forces, improve estimates of “tipping points”
Forecasting? Like how weather forecasts seem wrong more often than right? How the climate cult has been blowing prognostications for decades?
An expansive study of climate tipping points in this week’s issue Science is likely to fuel that discussion. It synthesizes the most current evidence on how much warming would risk passing 16 tipping points, triggering polar ice collapses, permafrost thawing, monsoon disruptions, and forest and coral reef diebacks. Many of these systems are already stressed by rising temperatures, and the study finds the world might already be within the warming range where the risk is elevated. It also concludes that even under the most ambitious scenario for limiting global warming—to 1.5°C compared with preindustrial levels—the planet could still see dramatic changes.
It’s a “timely and thorough piece of work,” says Chris Jones, a climate scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre. The findings are broadly consistent with previous work, he says, but updated and more detailed. He and other climate scientists warn against “cataclysmic” interpretations of the findings. The study also indicates that “a lot of really bad tipping points are still avoidable,” says Zeke Hausfather, leader of climate research at the technology firm Stripe.
So, now even 1.5C is super bad? Heck, even other doomsday cults have some positive news, right?
To estimate tipping points, University of Exeter earth systems scientist David Armstrong McKay and his colleagues gathered evidence from ancient climate records as well as modern observations, model predictions, and current best estimates. They looked at ecological, atmospheric, and other systems to identify those most at risk of abrupt, irreversible, or self-sustaining change as Earth warms. Then, they estimated the minimum amount of warming that might trigger a tipping point in each system, as well as the maximum warming a system might be able to withstand before a catastrophic shift becomes unavoidable. The authors also made a best estimate of where each tipping point sits—somewhere between the extremes—and noted how high their confidence was in each of the 16 forecasts.
This is all cute, because the Earth is such a dynamic system that it’s impossible to know all this stuff even in 2022. It is all a guess, or, as they like to call it, “current best estimates.” Almost all of which have failed for decades. And, unsurprising, if start digging deep, you see how much of this involves computer models, rather than hard research. They’ve been yammering about tipping points, the tipping points do not happen, so, let’s just move them to the future.
Read: Just A Tiny Temperature Rise Could Cause Doom Or Something »
In reality, this is not really the Trump rule, as illegals, and, heck, those here on visas, haven’t been able to get legal residency because they use government benefits. Also, this is something that should be done by the duly elected legislative branch
Biden administration undoes Trump-era immigration rule
The Biden administration has officially undone a Trump-era rule that barred immigrants from gaining legal residency if they had utilized certain government benefits, allowing for a return to a previous policy with a narrower scope.
The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday said a new regulation for the “public charge” rule would go into effect in late December, although the Biden administration had already stopped applying the previous version last year.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement that the shift “ensures fair and humane treatment.”
“Consistent with America’s bedrock values, we will not penalize individuals for choosing to access the health benefits and other supplemental government services available to them,” he said.
No, they’re just going to penalize American citizens, and this incentivizes even more to come to the U.S. illegally, figure out a way to get those government benefits, and get legal status. And this penalizes those going through the proper naturalization process who aren’t eligible, and must follow all the rules
The public charge regulation bars people from getting green cards if they would be burdens to the United States. For years prior to the Trump administration, that was interpreted as being primarily dependent on cash assistance, income maintenance or government support for long-term institutionalization.
But the Trump administration expanded the benefits to include non-cash assistance including food stamps and Medicaid. There were numerous legal challenges, but it was allowed to be implemented in 2020. Legal challenges went on, and in 2021, the Biden administration said it would not continue defending the rule.
If you’re coming here legally, you shouldn’t be a public charge. If you’re coming illegally, well, you should be deported immediately, not given government benefits on the backs of hardworking American citizens.
However
Democrat Lori Lightfoot: ‘Immoral, Unpatriotic’ to Bus Migrants to Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) now says it is “immoral” and “unpatriotic” for Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to bus migrants from Texas to the sanctuary city.
Last week, Abbott started busing border crossers to the sanctuary city of Chicago after sending thousands over the last few months to the sanctuary cities of New York City, New York, and Washington, D.C.
Initially, Lightfoot balked at the migrant buses by calling them “racist and xenophobic.” While visiting a shelter last week, Lightfoot called Abbott’s buses “immoral, unpatriotic” and claimed the operation “defies the values of who we are as Americans.”
Democrats love illegals, as long as they aren’t jamming up Democrat cities
Of course this is related to the Cult of Climastrology
Dutch town may ban meat ads in public spaces over climate change: report
Officials in one Dutch city are slated to ban most ads advertising meat in public areas because of its impact on the climate.
The motion was made by the GroenLinks, a green political party, and would go into effect in 2024 in Haarlem, the BBC reported. The meat sector in The Netherlands has opposed the move, saying it stifles free speech.
“Meat is very harmful to the environment. We cannot tell people that there is a climate crisis and encourage them to buy products that are part of it,” Ziggy Klazes, a member of GroenLinks who drafted the motion, told the Trouw newspaper.
The move would make Haarlem, just a few miles from Amsterdam, the first city in the world to ban most meat ads. It could include chicken sold in supermarkets and fast food.
If meat is so harmful, why wait till 2024? Do it now. And will any reporter ask the members of GroenLinks if they have stopped eating meat? This just continues to show that the climate cult is an authoritarian movement.
Elsewhere
Schumer in tough spot over Manchin promise
Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday pledged to add permitting reform legislation to a stopgap funding bill that would prevent a government shutdown, but he’s in a tough spot as he seeks to deliver on a promise to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).
The permitting reform is a side-deal Schumer struck with Manchin in late July to pass a climate, tax and health care bill known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which is projected to help reduce that nation’s carbon emissions by 40 percent by 2030.
Manchin offered his support for the bill in July after winning significant concessions, and his vote allowed Democrats to pass a major achievement for President Biden.
Schumer made clear Wednesday that he doesn’t plan to backtrack on his promise.
The thing is, the more extreme members of the Democratic Party are working hard to scuttle the side deal. Manchin was a fool for agreeing to back the Inflation Reduction Act, ie, Build Back Better version 4, in exchange for something in the future.
I’m going to clear out some of the saved articles below the fold
…are horrible Bad Weather clouds because Other People won’t switch to taking the train, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is The O.K. Corral, with a post on the most depressed cities in the U.S.
Read: If All You See… »
Unshockingly, The Hill reporter Tobias Burns failed to attempt to ask Janet Yellen how she’s traveling to the violent, Democratic Party run city of Detroit. Is she taking the train or an electric vehicle? Or, a fossil fueled flight followed by a fossil fueled limo? Without fossil fuels, how does Detroit survive? The Red Wings, Pistons, Lions, and Tigers (why is there no team named Bears?) wouldn’t be able to operate. Or all the ships that come through with goods. Also, Yellen is the Treasury Secretary, not the energy or transportation secretary
Yellen will vow to ‘rid’ US from ‘dependence on fossil fuels’ in Detroit speech
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will call out the fossil fuel industry in a Thursday speech on the Biden administration’s economic agenda to be delivered in Detroit, Mich., where oil and gas companies have long held influence in the U.S. auto manufacturing sector.
The visit to Detroit comes on the heels of the Democrats’ passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which includes $14.2 billion worth of subsidies for electric vehicles meant to wean the auto industry off of gasoline in an effort to reduce U.S. transportation emissions that are contributing to a rise in global temperatures.
“We will rid ourselves from our current dependence on fossil fuels,” Yellen’s prepared remarks say.
“Our plan — powered by the Inflation Reduction Act — represents the largest investment in fighting climate change in our country’s history. It will put us well on our way toward a future where we depend on the wind, sun, and other clean sources for our energy,” her remarks continue.
Yet, you can bet it’s a fossil fueled flight and a fossil fueled limo/SUV for Yellen, and not one reporter will ask her about it, since most of the reporters are part of the climate cult. Biden and his cohorts are running around calling people Fascists and semi-Fascists, yet, it’s Democrats attempting to use the power of government to destroy an economic sector and force people into EVs, whether they want one or not. It’s not Socialism: in true socialism government mostly stays out of people’s lives, and would have direct votes on things like this. It’s over in the Authoritarianism model, which provides force of government
Yellen’s speech will also emphasize the role that private capital can play in addressing climate change, putting her generally in line with the economic, social and corporate governance (ESG) movement. The ESG movement in the financial sector pursues environmental and social equality objectives through divestment practices and getting board members with particular political views elected to company boards.
“By mobilizing private capital, the clean energy tax credits implemented by Treasury will propel our economy and workers to a leadership position in the fastest growing markets and technologies of today and the future, with positive spillovers to the rest of the world. And in the process of boosting domestic clean energy production, the law will support our energy security and insulate us from the type of fossil fuel-driven energy volatility that we’ve seen in the past year,” her remarks say.
This is a carrot and stick approach. The carrot is free money from the government. The stick is a threat that they best join the cult, otherwise there will be consequences. They’re attempting to turn the U.S. into a command economy, like the Soviet Union, Venezuela, and Nazi Germany. You will comply, Comrade.
Read: Janet Yellen To Take Long Fossil Fueled Flight To Make Speech Denigrating Fossil Fuels Companies »
This is what happens when you have way too many government regulations coming from bureaucrats rather than the professions who do this for a living
California’s Battery Problems Heighten Threat of Power Outages
The batteries that help fortify California’s electric grid are kicking in at times when they’re not really needed, draining the power source before more critical junctures and heightening the chances of blackouts as a blistering heat wave punishes the state.
Batteries help to store extra electricity, generated by solar or hydropower. That surplus is supposed to act as a cushion for times when those intermittent renewable sources are running low. But the grid uses a pricing mechanism to trigger the batteries, rather than basing it on pure demand levels. That can lead to mismatches.
That’s exactly what happened on Tuesday, when the state declared a grid emergency and only narrowly avoided major power outages.
Batteries began discharging in the middle of the afternoon, when there was still plenty of solar power and other supplies available to meet electricity demand. That depleted the cushion before it was more critically needed in the early evening, when the state was on the brink of rotating blackouts as demand hit an all-time record and solar supplies started dropping as the sun set. If it weren’t for a timely emergency mobile-phone alert calling on Californians to conserve power immediately, swaths of the state could have been plunged into darkness.
Did not one say at some point “hey, perhaps we should change the usage priority?” If they did, were they shut down?
While blackouts were averted on Tuesday, the battery situation points to a deeper issue with the grid that could continue to exacerbate the risk of outages until it’s resolved. On Wednesday afternoon, the state’s grid operator ratcheted its energy emergency to the second of three levels after 1 p.m. local time and once again warned California could face power shortfalls.
The reason for Tuesday’s earlier-than-expected deployment of batteries likely has to do with market signals. The way the California power market is set up now, energy storage systems are called upon to dispatch by the grid operator when the wholesale power price hits a cap of $1,000 a megawatt-hour, said Cody Hill, senior vice president of battery systems at Rev Renewables, a renewable energy and storage company.
And that is set by government, not the energy companies. Government’s have way, way, way too much control over the energy sector.
Yesterday we rallied together during this historic heatwave. Today, let’s do it again.
We are now in a Flex Alert.
Here’s what to do until 9pm tonight:
– Set thermostats to 78
– Turn off unnecessary lights
– Avoid using large appliances— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) September 8, 2022
Just wondering, did any reporter go to the governor’s mansion and ask to see the thermostat? See if the lights were on? Using large appliances?
Read: Bummer: California’s Solar Batteries Have Been Kicking In At The Wrong Time »
What are the odds that the Biden admin fails to make the deadline?
A federal judge in Louisiana ruled Tuesday that the Biden administration has 21 days to turn over all relevant emails sent by White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and Dr. Anthony Fauci to social media platforms regarding alleged misinformation and the censorship of social media content.
The decision by Judge Terry Doughty, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, came as part of a lawsuit filed in May by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, accusing the Biden administration of suppressing the constitutionally protected right to free speech on elections, the COVID-19 lab leak theory, coronavirus-related lockdowns and other issues.
The Justice Department objected to the handing over of the email correspondence under executive privilege and presidential communications privilege, but Doughty decided, “This Court believes Plaintiffs are entitled to external communications by Jean-Pierre and Dr. Fauci in their capacities as White House Press Secretary and Chief Medical Advisor to the President to third-party social media platforms.”
Of course the Biden admin is attempting to shield their communications from the public, even though they have zero national security implications. The emails will show the Brandon admin attempting to get tech companies to restrict 1st Amendment Freedoms.
Schmitt, who is running for U.S. Senate in Missouri, announced the development regarding his lawsuit on Twitter.
In their initial filing, he and Landry argued that “having threatened and cajoled social-media platforms for years to censor viewpoints and speakers disfavored by the Left, senior government officials in the Executive Branch have moved into a phase of open collusion with social-media platforms under the Orwellian guise of halting so-called ‘disinformation,’ ‘misinformation’ and ‘malinformation.'”
“As a result of these actions, there has been an unprecedented rise of censorship and suppression of free speech — including core political speech — on social media platforms,” the lawsuit says. “Not just fringe views, but perfectly legitimate, responsible viewpoints and speakers have been unlawfully and unconstitutionally threatened in the modern public square.”
Well, of course they are. It’s what they do.
In response to the ruling, an administration official told Fox News that as a general matter, “as we have said over and over again since the beginning of the administration in our battle against COVID-19, it has been critical for the American people to have access to factual, accurate, science-based information.”
So, then they put their views out there, and try and convince everyone that they are correct. Shutting down opposing voices is what authoritarians do. Despots do. Government attempting to shut down opposing views, and actually shutting down views, makes people wonder why the government is trying to censor citizen’s voices.
“We believe in and we support freedom of speech, and we also believe it is important for all media platforms, including social media, to represent factual scientific information and combat misinformation and disinformation that can cost lives,” the official concluded.
You can literally see the “but” between the two, eh?
Read: Judge Orders Fauci, WH Press Secretary To Turn Over “Disinformation” Emails »
Good news for Warmists: it’s not dead last
Environment, climate change a mid-pack concern for older voters, per AARP poll
The environment and climate change came in at No. 6 among older voters’ top priorities for Governor.
The effects of climate change are such that some politicians will support bills that deal with climate resiliency without addressing climate change directly in their rhetoric. Meanwhile, Florida’s very name is a nod to the unique natural life that calls this state home.
However, it can be challenging for environmental issues to break through in favorable years, and this is not one — pocketbook issues that typically dominate voter concerns have some extra oomph.
A new poll from AARP shows the environment and climate change in the middle to back of the pack on issues important to people aged 50 years and older.
A bipartisan polling firm team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research collaborated on the poll that involved more than 1,600 Floridians the week of Aug. 24-31.
The poll, which had a 4.4% margin of error, included 500 likely voters, with an emphasis on older likely voters that included 550 likely voters 50 and older, with 262 Hispanic and 314 Black voters.
There’s two relevant graphics
So, for senate just 5%, governor 7%. Of course, when you have both environment and climate, the numbers are higher. I bet if you separated them the environment alone would be at least 4-5 points higher. Interestingly, though, is, if you refer to the last slide of the poll, you see that 58% of respondents are suburban, 26% urban, and 54% are women, so, you’d expect the number to be higher. However, the party ID is 44% Republican, 36% Democrat, 20% independent, which can also skew the poll. Regardless, it’s just more proof that after 30+ years of spreading awareness ‘climate change’ is just not that important of a real world issue. Even among Dems it only made it to 10% for the state concerns.
Read: Surprise: Hotcoldwetdry A Lower Ranking Concern For Floridians 50 And Over »