Texas Governor Hits Back At NYC Mayor Adams

By William Teach August 11, 2022 – 7:00 am

One would think that a supporter of unfettered illegal immigration and keeping NYC a sanctuary city would be thrilled to have as many illegals/migrants as possible, showing his tolerance and caring

Abbott’s campaign hits back after NYC Mayor Adams threatens to bus New Yorkers to Texas

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s campaign on Tuesday shot back at New York City Mayor Eric Adams after Hizzoner threatened to send busloads of New Yorkers to Texas to campaign against Abbott in the upcoming gubernatorial election in retaliation for Texas sending busloads of migrants to the Big Apple.

“I already called all of my friends in Texas and told them how to cast their vote, and I am deeply contemplating taking a busload of New Yorkers to go to Texas and do some good old-fashioned door knocking because, for the good of America, we have to get him out of office,” Adams said Tuesday during a press conference.

So, Adams doesn’t like all the illegals being dropped off? Huh

“Because of high taxes, out of control crime, and poor leadership by the Mayor, people are volunteering to leave New York City without the Mayor asking,” campaign spokesperson Mark Miner told Fox News Digital. “It looks like Mayor Adams has taken on the additional role of political director for [Democratic candidate] Beto O’ Rourke.”

That clash came hours before three more buses arrived in New York City on Wednesday morning.

The more Adams whines, the more buses Abbott should send. Start dropping them off at E 88th St &, East End Ave in Manhattan, the address of Gracie Mansion, the official residence of the NYC mayor.

Though, it would be fun if they were dropped off in Rehoboth, Delaware, the town Biden has his beach house in.

 

Read: Texas Governor Hits Back At NYC Mayor Adams »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Earth Spinning Faster Causes Climate Insanity, Er, Anxiety Or Something

By William Teach August 10, 2022 – 6:47 pm

CNN is very vexed with your Americans

Many Americans still don’t think climate change is coming for them

(a bunch of stupid stuff blaming Bad Weather on your carbon footprint)

A majority of Americans acknowledge that climate change is real and that humans contribute to it.

But a lot of people in eastern Kentucky might not know they’re feeling the effects of the climate crisis.

About half the country in 2021 — 47% — believed global warming would harm them personally, according to data gathered by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.

Maybe the majority do not because they know it’s a scam, especially with dumb stuff like this

The Earth spun faster than usual on June 29 and triggered climate anxiety — here’s how to cope

The Earth shaved 1.59 milliseconds off its rotation on June 29, 2022 and became the shortest day recorded since accurate daily measurements using atomic clocks first began in the 1960s.

The length of day is measured by how fast or slow the Earth is spinning, and data from recent years show that Earth is spinning faster than it ever has, according to scientists who study the Earth’s rotation.

Twenty eight of the shortest days ever recorded were in 2020, but June 29 and July 26 this year surpassed the shortest day in 2020. Simultaneously, days are mysteriously getting longer, according to scientists who wrote about it in Science Alert. It’s unclear what accounts for the change, but scientists have predictions about potential causes like changes in weather systems, major earthquakes, melting ice caps and more.

For many, these new findings — coupled with the severe heat we’ve been experiencing around the world and the extreme flooding in Kentucky and Missouri — are triggering feelings of climate anxiety.

See the climate cultists want to Blame this on the melting poles, because that’s never happened before, and, quite frankly we have no true measurements from during the previous Holocene warm and cool periods. But, it wouldn’t matter, because these people are nuts.

Read: Earth Spinning Faster Causes Climate Insanity, Er, Anxiety Or Something »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 10, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…is a sea that will soon rise up and wipe out coastal liberal cities, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Greenie Watch, with a post on Germany reconnecting a coal plant.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 32 Comments | Trackback URL

Good News: Inflation To Stay High Even As Gas Prices Fall

By William Teach August 10, 2022 – 10:30 am

Well, yeah, because gas is still much higher than when Biden took office, and so much of today’s prices have that price increase built in. Plus, there are many other factors

US inflation will likely stay high even as gas prices fall

Americans may finally be catching a break from relentlessly surging prices — if just a slight one — even as inflation is expected to remain painfully high for months.

Thanks largely to falling gas prices, the government’s inflation report for July, to be released Wednesday morning, is expected to show that prices jumped 8.7% from a year earlier — still a sizzling pace but a slowdown from the 9.1% year-over-year figure in June, which was the highest in four decades.

The forecast by economists, if it proves correct, would raise hopes that inflation might have peaked and that the run of punishingly higher prices is beginning to ease slightly. There have been other hopeful signs, too, that the pace of inflation may be moderating.

At the same time, an array of other economic developments are threatening to keep intensifying inflation pressures. The pace of hiring is robust and average wages are up sharply. And even as gas prices fall, inflation in services such as health care, rents and restaurant meals is accelerating. Price changes in services tend to be sticky and don’t ease as quickly as they do for gas, food or other goods. Those trends suggest that overall inflation may not drop significantly anytime soon.

There are a lot more factors, especially the low availaibility of microchips and used vehicles, which really increase inflation. The lack of new vehicles doesn’t help, not when dealers are, at best, charging MSRP, at worst, charging thousands more. You can find cause after cause, going back to China’s COVID19.

Other items may have also helped lower price gains in July: Food costs, though they likely kept rising, probably did so at a slower pace than in June. Prices for used cars, clothing and rental cars may have fallen, too.

Not sure about clothes, but, the other two have not dropped.

The number of ships waiting to be unloaded at the Los Angeles/Long Beach port has fallen for six straight months, according to Oxford Economics. Shipping costs have generally leveled off or declined, including for trucking and rail services, Oxford said, though they remain high.

Those costs may not be going up much, if at all, but, they are staying elevated. A tiny decrease won’t mean much at all.

But a survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, released Monday, showed that Americans now expect lower inflation in the next few years than they did a month ago. Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment strategist at BMO Wealth Management, said lower inflation expectations may allow the Fed to react less aggressively to reports, such as last month’s burst of hiring, that suggest the economy is still strong and that inflation could remain high.

Well, yeah, we don’t expect it to stay high. We aren’t Venezuela or some 3rd world nation. But, people do still expect this to go on for years.

Falling prices online and at the pump fuel hopes for inflation-ravaged economy

The Biden administration on Tuesday got some much-needed good news on inflation: Online consumer prices dropped in July — the first time in more than two years that’s happened.

It’s another early sign that the white-hot inflation that has plagued the economy for more than a year could be abating as the Federal Reserve aggressively raises interest rates. Gas prices have dropped for eight straight weeks. Key commodities costs have eased. Walmart and other giant retailers are slashing prices. And even consumers are telling the Fed that their long-term fears of inflation are subsiding.

The problem here is that it looks good, but, much is due to demand destruction, meaning people are using less gas and buying fewer products, especially non-essential goods and services. People will still notice that gas is, nationally, $4.01, much higher than January 20th, 2021. Home energy is high. Food is high. Essentials are high.

Read: Good News: Inflation To Stay High Even As Gas Prices Fall »

Posted in Economy, Energy | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Good News: Myanmar Bears Cost For Elites Green Agenda

By William Teach August 10, 2022 – 7:00 am

I’m rather surprised that the big wigs at the Associated Press allowed this to be published

‘The Sacrifice Zone’: Myanmar bears cost of green energy

The birds no longer sing. The fish no longer swim in rivers that have turned a murky brown. The animals do not roam, and the cows are sometimes found dead.

The people in this northern Myanmar forest have lost a way of life that goes back generations. But if they complain, they, too, face the threat of death.

This forest is the source of several key metallic elements known as rare earths, often called the vitamins of the modern world. Rare earths now reach into the lives of almost everyone on the planet, turning up in everything from hard drives and cellphones to elevators and trains. They are especially vital to the fast-growing field of green energy, feeding wind turbines and Tesla engines. And they end up in the supply chains of some of the most prominent companies in the world, including General Motors, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Tesla and Apple.

But an AP investigation has found that their universal use hides a dirty open secret in the industry: Their cost is environmental destruction, the theft of land from villagers and the funneling of money to brutal militias, including at least one linked to Myanmar’s secretive military government. And as demand soars for rare earths along with green energy, the abuses are likely to grow.

“This rapid push to build out mining capacity is being justified in the name of climate change,” said Julie Michelle Klinger, author of the book “Rare Earths Frontiers,” who is leading a federal project to trace illicit energy minerals. “There’s still this push to find the right place to mine them, which is a place that is out of sight and out of mind.”

But, hey, it’s over there in the 3rd World, which means the 1st World elitist climate cultists do not have to see what their beliefs are causing. Most companies did not respond to the APs questions. Better

The State Department, which leads work on securing the U.S. rare earths supply, did not respond to repeated requests for comment. But experts say the government weighs the regulation of rare earths against other green goals, such as the sales and use of electric vehicles. Rare earths are also omitted from the European Union’s 2021 regulation on conflict minerals.

Yeah, so the State Department is blowing smoke and providing cover all in the name of the Climate Cult.

There is a name for what Myanmar has become: A “sacrifice zone,” or a place that destroys itself for the good of the world.

Good job, Warmists

Militias are rampant in these northern forest frontier areas, including at least one tied to the military-backed Border Guard Force. The Myanmar military or Tatmadaw is under international sanctions for human rights abuses after it seized power last year. That means the rare earths money it gets from the militia may be fueling a violent crackdown against civilians. The Myanmar military and militia leaders did not respond to requests for comment.

Hey, there has to be some sacrifice for the green agenda, right?

Read: Good News: Myanmar Bears Cost For Elites Green Agenda »

Posted in Climate Cult, Environment, Global Warming | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Hot Take: Trump Could Be Charged With Espionage Act Violations

By William Teach August 10, 2022 – 6:45 am

Did we not hear something about this in 2016?

Trump could be charged with violating the Espionage Act, former DOJ national security chief says

The former chief of the Justice Department’s national security division said Tuesday that the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Fla., suggests that the former president could be charged with violating the World War I-era Espionage Act.

That law has traditionally been used to target government leakers, such as former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. But it also “actually has provisions that apply to essentially the mishandling [of classified material] through gross negligence, permitting documents to be removed from their proper place, or to be lost, stolen or destroyed,” Mary McCord, a veteran federal prosecutor who headed DOJ’s national security division in the closing years of the Obama administration, told the Yahoo News “Skullduggery” podcast.

McCord said that the Espionage Act is one of two federal crimes that appear to apply to Trump’s reported conduct. He could also be charged, she said, with violating another federal statute that targets anyone who “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys public records.”

OK, this speculation, a lot of others think this is related to the stupid J6 stuff. Regardless, if Trump is charged, how will the same media and Democrats react when they cheered on Hillary Clinton actually doing everything mentioned above and being let off the hook scott free? It really is a two tiered justice system, and it will tear the country apart further. You know there was no way in hell that the FBI performed a pre-dawn raid on Trump’s Mar-A-Lago residence without the knowledge of Merrick Garland and Joe Biden.

I’m surprised the Washington Post let him post this. Look, this is going to harden support for Trump to run again. Personally, I want some new blood, but, this will fire up the GOP voters (excluding the unhinged #NeverTrumpers who’ve given up all pretense of conservative leanings) to get out there, starting with the mid-terms.

Read: Hot Take: Trump Could Be Charged With Espionage Act Violations »

Posted in Constitution, Current Affairs, Donald Trump | 15 Comments | Trackback URL

Good News: Almost No EVs Will Qualify For The Tax Credits

By William Teach August 9, 2022 – 3:51 pm

This is what happens when you neither read nor understand the legislation you’re voting for, when you’re just desperate to Do Something and do not really consider that it actually has to make sense, not just be a Talking Point

The climate bill could short-circuit EV tax credits, making qualifying for them nearly impossible

The U.S. Senate passed a far-reaching climate, energy and health care bill on Aug. 7, 2022, that invests an unprecedented US$370 billion in energy and climate programs over the next 10 years – including incentives to expand renewable energy and electric vehicles.

Rapid and widespread adoption of electric vehicles will be essential for the United States to meet its climate goals. And the new bill, which includes a host of other health and tax-related provisions, aims to encourage people to trade their gasoline-fueled cars for electrics by offering a tax credit of up to $7,500 for new electric vehicles and up to $4,000 for used electric vehicles through 2032.

But there’s a catch, and it could end up making it difficult for most EVs to qualify for the new incentive.

A catch? The hell you say!

The bill, which needs House approval, requires that new electric vehicles meet stringent sourcing requirements for critical materials, the components of the battery, and final assembly to qualify for the tax credits. While some automakers, like Tesla and GM, have well-developed domestic supply chains, no electric vehicle manufacturer currently meets all the bill’s requirements.

Wait, what was that final line? “no EV manufacturer currently meets all the bill’s requirements.” Huh. That’s what you would call a Class 1 Fuckup.

The problem is that the Inflation Reduction Act’s sourcing requirements come online so quickly, starting in 2023, and ratchet upward so rapidly, that the plan could backfire. Instead of expanding electric vehicle adoption, the policy could make almost all electric vehicles ineligible for the tax incentives.

The bill excludes incentives for any new vehicle which contains battery materials or components extracted, processed, manufactured or assembled by a “foreign entity of concern” – a category which includes China.

Whoops. At least 40% of the battery components must come from the U.S. or a nation we have a fair trade deal. China controls somewhere between 60-80% of the market at this time, and are producing 76% of the world’s EV batteries. (that info via Reason)

Although EV manufacturers are already pursuing plans to develop supply chains that meet these sourcing requirements, proposals for mines and processing facilities often face challenges. Indigenous and environmental concerns have slowed a proposed lithium mine in Nevada. In some cases, key materials, such as cobalt and graphite, are not readily sourced domestically or from fair-trade allies.

Double whoops. And, seriously, do you think there won’t be lawsuits left and right if the federal government even greenlights domestic mining? The hardcore enviroweenies won’t allow it. And, if it looks like it has a chance of going forward, they will do anything from mass protests at the site to performing illegal acts.

(Reuters) Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan told Reuters on Tuesday: “It’s a very cumbersome, unworkable credit once the full restrictions set in. There’s conversations going on.”

Perhaps you should have thought of this before jamming the legislation through.

Read: Good News: Almost No EVs Will Qualify For The Tax Credits »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Democrats, Global Warming, Surrender Monkey Friday | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 9, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…is horrible carbon polluting concrete, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on Biden’s Afghanistan debacle one year later.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

NY Times: Consumers Will Totally Save Money From IRA

By William Teach August 9, 2022 – 10:30 am

I love that Democrats are referring to the Inflation Reduction Act as the IRA (when they aren’t referring to it as pretty much anything besides an inflation reduction measure), because it’s going to blow a lot of things up (not paywalled version here)

Consumers Will Benefit From Lower Utility Bills and Cheaper Home Upgrades, Energy Experts Say

spite houseThe Inflation Reduction Act that was passed by the Senate on Sunday could lower electricity bills for consumers and the prices of things such as rooftop solar panels, energy-efficient appliances and electric vehicles, Democrats and some energy experts said.

Under the legislation, a home improvement credit for energy efficiency would allow households to deduct from their taxes up to 30% of the cost of upgrades like heat pumps and insulation. Another provision extends a program that allows households that are installing solar or battery storage systems to deduct 30% of the cost of those projects from their taxes. (skipping a short paragraph on a hardcore leftist group saying it will save $1,800, which I covered here)

The package also continues an incentive for families to replace their gas-powered vehicles with electric. It extends a current $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles and $4,000 for a used one. Couples who earn less than $300,000 a year or individuals who earn less than $150,000 a year would be eligible for the credits, and consumers would get the discount at the dealership.

So, if you spend a hundred grand, you can save a bit, eh? Heat pumps: they cost about the same as a new AC system. Why would you replace your existing system if it still works? Also, they’re only good for certain climates. North of the Mason Dixon line they might be OK, but, not in the South and Southwest. It’s much smarter to have a split system, with an AC unit and furnace.

The average cost of installing solar panels is $18,000. Oh, sure, it will be less with federal “rebates”, but, does the average family have that cash sitting around? Then the cost of batteries. Oh, and then the cost of insulation, which had already skyrocketed while Obama was in office pushing the same thing, same with efficient windows, will go up more.

EVs? Well

Republicans said they expected the measure to drive up inflation and said the credits would not help Americans.

“They’re not into buying an electric car any time in the near future,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said of his constituents. “They’d like gas prices to come down because we’re producing more oil.”

The majority of EV buyers make at least $150K a year, so, upper middle class and the rich. This is not for the average American. And, that’s the end of the article. There’s nothing else about how this will lower energy bills. Zip. I’ve left just two paragraphs, the aforementioned one on $1,800 savings and

“This bill will help create jobs and lower costs for many American families,” in addition to slowing climate change, said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del.

No one in the media seems to be asking for actual details, and the media cannot provide details themselves. It really is a giveaway to the rich at the expense of the middle and lower classes

Separately, the Times also delves into food prices, with this wonderful graphic

Yeah, it’s hilariously about upscale dining and increased costs (which never really seem to blame China for releasing COVID19). Gochujang? Scallops? Arugula? Quail?

Read: NY Times: Consumers Will Totally Save Money From IRA »

Posted in Democrats, Economy, Energy | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

NY Times: Say, These EVs Are Rather Expensive For The Middle And Lower Classes, Eh?

By William Teach August 9, 2022 – 7:15 am

After all this time pushing how utterly wonderful EVs are, the NY Times finally got the memo. The best part is the subhead

Electric Cars Too Costly for Many, Even With Aid in Climate Bill
Battery-powered vehicles are considered essential to the fight against climate change, but most models are aimed at the affluent.

Oh, now they tell us

Electric vehiclePolicymakers in Washington are promoting electric vehicles as a solution to climate change. But an uncomfortable truth remains: Battery-powered cars are much too expensive for a vast majority of Americans.

Congress has begun trying to address that problem. The climate and energy package passed on Sunday by the Senate, the Inflation Reduction Act, would give buyers of used electric cars a tax credit.

But automakers have complained that the credit would apply to only a narrow slice of vehicles, at least initially, largely because of domestic sourcing requirements. And experts say broader steps are needed to make electric cars more affordable and to get enough of them on the road to put a serious dent in greenhouse gas emissions.

High prices are caused by shortages of batteries, of raw materials like lithium and of components like semiconductors. Strong demand for electric vehicles from affluent buyers means that carmakers have little incentive to sell cheaper models. For low- and middle-income people who don’t have their own garages or driveways, another obstacle is the lack of enough public facilities to recharge.

Sell cheaper? There’s a cost to make a vehicle. Does the NY Times sell it’s paper cheaper, or, do they need to actually sell at a profitable price?

To some extent, the carmakers are following their usual game plan. They have always introduced new technology at a luxury price. With time, the features and gadgets make their way into cheaper cars.

But emission-free technology has an urgency that voice navigation or massaging seats did not. Transportation accounts for 27 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Battery-powered cars produce far less carbon dioxide than vehicles that run on gasoline or diesel. That’s true even accounting for the emissions from generating electricity and from manufacturing batteries, according to numerous studies.

The strange part is that those in a position to demand this stuff, like those in the Credentialed Media, appointed officials, and elected politicians don’t seem, for the most part, to be giving up their own fossil fueled vehicles and travel. If the GOP had any cajones they’d start introducing legislation requiring members of Congress, their staffs, appointed Executive Branch officials, and members of the White House to take non-fossil fueled travel. Sure, it won’t pass at the moment, but, it would show the hypocrisy.

Read: NY Times: Say, These EVs Are Rather Expensive For The Middle And Lower Classes, Eh? »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 14 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove