Comrade Bernie Says Inflation Reduction Act Will Have Minimal Effect On Inflation

By William Teach August 7, 2022 – 7:00 am

He still voted to begin debate on Build Back Better version 4, and, you know he will vote for this non-inflation reduction bill

Bernie Sanders says Inflation Reduction Act will have ‘minimal impact’ on inflation

Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders adopted a tone more similar to that of Congressional Republicans than Democrats on Saturday when he said that the hotly debated Inflation Reduction Act will do little to reduce inflation.

“Madam President, I want to take a moment to say a few words about the so-called inflation reduction that we are debating this evening,” Sanders said on the Senate floor on Saturday night. “And I say so-called, by the way, because according to the CBO, and other economic organizations that study this bill, it will, in fact, have a minimal impact on inflation.”

Sanders went on to criticize the bill by saying that it does not address childhood poverty, income inequality, or the “dysfunctional” healthcare system in the United States.

Sanders explained that the bill “turns its back on the working parents of this country and our children.”

What Comrade Bernie really wants to do is spend more money, which would certainly have an effect, right? Just not the one he’s looking for, because the bill already is dangerous

Over 230 economists warn Manchin’s spending bill will perpetuate inflation

A letter sent to House and Senate leadership from 230 economists argues that the Inflation Reduction Act is expected to contribute to skyrocketing inflation and will burden the U.S. economy, contrary to President Biden and Democrats’ claims.

The economists wrote in the letter first obtained by Fox News Digital that the U.S. economy is at a “dangerous crossroads” and the “inaptly named ‘Inflation Reduction Act of 2022’ would do nothing of the sort and instead would perpetuate the same fiscal policy errors that have helped precipitate the current troubling economic climate.”

The economic experts point to the $433 billion in proposed government spending, which they argue “would create immediate inflationary pressures by boosting demand, while the supply-side tax hikes would constrain supply by discouraging investment and draining the private sector of much-needed resources.”

Here’s the thing: Democrats do not care. They see themselves losing the House, and possibly the Senate, so, they want to ram through their agenda, knowing that the GOP will not be able to roll it back unless the GOP wins the White House in 2024, and keeps the Senate and House, and then they’re counting on the GOP forgetting to do away with the legislation. It’s a good bet. And they do not care if it hurts the middle class. Like this

It doesn’t matter if the tax increase are small, they’re increases, and with 87K more IRS agents, they’ll make damned sure they get every cent out of your wallet.

Hundreds? Over what time period? Why would some pay thousands to replace their appliances when they are working well, and won’t get that back in credits? And those appliances will go up in price if there are actual rebates. Do you have $10k to put solar panels on your home? What about those who do not own homes and cannot afford them now? Weatherization costs have skyrocketed. Seriously, rebates and incentives on products that most in the middle and lower classes cannot afford. This is a giveaway to his rich voters.

Read: Comrade Bernie Says Inflation Reduction Act Will Have Minimal Effect On Inflation »

Posted in Democrats, Economy, Joe Biden | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: Great Barrier Reef Showing High Coral Cover

By William Teach August 6, 2022 – 3:00 pm

According to the Cult of Climastrology, ‘climate change’ continues to get more and more apocalyptic, which dooms corals (even though coral loves warm water, and lots of islands and atolls were created when the seas were higher), so, how does this happen?

Parts of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef show highest coral cover in 36 years

Two-thirds of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef showed the largest amount of coral cover in 36 years, but the reef remains vulnerable to increasingly frequent mass bleaching, an official long-term monitoring programme reported on Thursday.

The recovery in the central and northern stretches of the UNESCO world heritage-listed reef contrasted with the southern region, where there was a loss of coral cover due to crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks, the Australian Institute of Marine Sciences (AIMS) said in its annual report.

“What we’re seeing is that the Great Barrier Reef is still a resilient system. It still maintains that ability to recover from disturbances,” AIMS monitoring programme leader Mike Emslie told Reuters.

“But the worrying thing is that the frequency of these disturbance events are increasing, particularly the mass coral bleaching events,” he said.

The thing is, could the events and loss of coral be from other things? We see the problems with the starfish (also blamed on climate crisis): could ocean pollution be a cause? It’s the most likely, while a areas like Australia practicing better clean water policies helps, but, an occasional influx of polluted water from places like China and India could cause problems. Do we have any way to compare this to what happened during the Medieval Warm Period and Roman Warm Period?

On the northern region, average hard coral cover grew to 36% in 2022 from a low of 13% in 2017, while on the central region hard coral cover increased to 33% from a low of 12% in 2019 – the highest levels recorded for both regions since the institute began monitoring the reef in 1985.

Could any of this be do to the lower levels of other atmospheric gases than CO2 due to COVID lockdowns? Be worth looking at. Regardless, it’s just another case of the climate cult’s talking points of Doom taking a hit.

Read: Bummer: Great Barrier Reef Showing High Coral Cover »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 6, 2022 – 1:25 pm

…is a field that would be perfect for solar panels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on Biden denying National Guard for all the D.C. illegal aliens.

Doubleshot below the fold, check out Weasel Zippers, with a post on leftists dominating the FBI domestic most wanted terrorist list.

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 15 Comments | Trackback URL

Democrats Cancel Senate Covid Policy To Attempt To Pass “Inflation Reduction Act”

By William Teach August 6, 2022 – 10:30 am

These are the same people who tell us to get our 9th booster and wear a mask everywhere (and wear them mostly for show themselves, while Biden tested positive a 3rd time despite being isolated), who threatened GOP members with fines for refusing to cooperate with the Dems COVID policies

‘Don’t Test, Don’t Tell’: Senate Democrats Cancel COVID Policy to Ram Through Reconciliation Bill

Senate Democrats have reportedly canceled their coronavirus testing policy over the weekend to ram through a reconciliation bill, dubbed the “Inflation Reduction Act.”

“Senate Democrats, some of whom have decried their G.O.P. colleagues’ lenient attitude toward masking, have adopted an unofficial ‘Don’t Test, Don’t Tell,’ protocol of late, particularly as they endeavor to pass the historic Inflation Reduction Act this weekend,” Puck reported.

The change in policy is a result of Democrats fearing their coronavirus policy may undermine their ability to pass the legislation.

What if someone has COVID? If Republicans were scumbags like Democrats, one of them would have caught it and brought it to the Senate floor earlier in the week

The Puck piece is behind a pretty good paywall, cannot see it with Pocket or 12 Foot Ladder, here’s the whole excerpt if you don’t want to click on Twitter

So, it could be a superspreader event. How ironic would it be if a bunch of Democrats came down with Wuhan Flu next week?

The bill, however, is not finalized. Under Senate reconciliation rules, the Senate parliamentarian still must resolve several issues with the partisan legislation, such as Medicare drug price negations, climate change, and health care provisions. Democrats are using reconciliation to circumvent the 60 vote filibuster proof filibuster.

The bill as it’s meant to be voted on is not online yet at Congress.gov. You know most Democrats have not read it, they don’t know the implications or impacts. And it might not be ready at anytime today. If Republicans were smart, they would not come to work today. Article I, section 5 of the Constitution requires that a quorum (51 senators) be present for the Senate to conduct business. If zero Republicans show, that means just 50 Senators, and, no, VP Harris would not be considered 51.

And then there’s this

What’s in the Senate Democrats’ landmark ‘Inflation Reduction Act’?

….

Tax analysts argue that the legislation would help American families who make less than $400,000. Democrats say it would reduce inflation at least in part by lowering the deficit, a key priority for Manchin.

The bill would reduce federal budget deficits by $102 billion over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

That’s all ABC News is able to say on the potential inflation reduction. I’ve read the piece 3 times. I cannot find anything else. Which is the way most Credentialed News pieces go: calling it the Inflation Reduction Act and unable to provide anything to show it reduces inflation. “Democrats say” is not the flex they think it is, and $102 billion over 10 years is nothing.

Read: Democrats Cancel Senate Covid Policy To Attempt To Pass “Inflation Reduction Act” »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Democrats | 29 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: California Hates Fossil Fuels But Needs Them For Power

By William Teach August 6, 2022 – 7:15 am

Does California really hate fossil fuels? Obviously, the minority which votes Republican doesn’t. But, what of the typical Democrat voter? They profess they hate fossil fuels and want them gone, and support silly initiatives like suing fossil fuels companies, blocking construction of new gas stations, doing away with the sale of fossil fueled vehicles in the near future, forcing Other People onto public transportation, and others. And. certainly the elected Democrats and their appointees hate them. But, see, there are two problems. First, almost all these people are refusing to give up their own use of fossil fuels. Second

California scorns fossil fuel but can’t keep the lights on without it

California wants to quit fossil fuels. Just not yet.

Faced with a fragile electrical grid and the prospect of summertime blackouts, the state agreed to put aside hundreds of millions of dollars to buy power from fossil fuel plants that are scheduled to shut down as soon as next year.

That has prompted a backlash from environmental groups and lawmakers who say Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s approach could end up extending the life of gas plants that have been on-track to close for more than a decade and could threaten the state’s goal to be carbon neutral by 2045.

“The emphasis that the governor has been making is ‘We’re going to be Climate Leaders; we’re going to do 100 percent clean energy; we’re going to lead the nation and the world,’” said V. John White, executive director of the Sacramento-based Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, a non-profit group of environmental advocates and clean energy companies. “Yet, at least a part of this plan means going the opposite direction.”

It’s all fun and games until the Cold Dead Mackerel Of Reality slaps them in the face. It’s really easy to believe in Doing Something about anthropogenic climate change in theory, not so much in practice. Want to put up off and on short wind turbines? That’s great, right up till extreme enviros and rich folks who like their views sue. Solar farms? Yeah, same enviroweenies will sue to stop them over something or other.

The legislation, which some Democrats labeled as “lousy” and “crappy,” reflects the reality of climate change. Heat waves are already straining power capacity, and the transition to cleaner energy isn’t coming fast enough to meet immediate needs in the nation’s most populous state.

Officials have warned that outages would be possible this summer, with as many as 3.75 million California homes losing power in a worst-case scenario of a West-wide heat wave and insufficient electrical supplies, particularly in the evenings.

It’s also an acknowledgment of the political reality that blackouts are hazardous to elected officials, even in a state dominated by one party.

Yeah, well, California has been pushing this for decades, and still doesn’t have the power generation necessary to replace coal, oil, and nuclear. If the leftist there really Believe, they should be willing to suffer for those beliefs, right?

Read: Bummer: California Hates Fossil Fuels But Needs Them For Power »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Funny: Buses From Texas Carrying Illegals Arrive In NYC

By William Teach August 6, 2022 – 7:00 am

The mayor of NYC is going to be even more unhappy. He supports the heck out of illegal immigration, as long as it’s not his city

Texas governor sends migrants to New York City as immigration standoff accelerates

Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, said on Friday he has started to send buses carrying migrants to New York City in an effort to push responsibility for border crossers to Democratic mayors and U.S. President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

The first bus arrived early on Friday at the city’s Port Authority Bus Terminal in midtown Manhattan carrying around 50 migrants from Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras and Venezuela. Volunteers were helping to steer people who had no relatives in town to city resources.

“Most of them don’t have anybody to help. They don’t know where to go, so we’re taking them to shelters,” said one volunteer at the bus station, Evelin Zapata, from a group called Grannies Respond.

One family of four from Colombia, who ended up at a homeless intake center in the Bronx, were unsure of where they would spend the night. Byron and Leidy, both 28, said they left the country’s capital Bogota because they were having trouble finding work. They did not provide their last name.

“It’s a little easier to enter the country now, before it was very hard to come here with children,” said Leidy, who traveled with her kids Mariana, 7, and Nicolas, 13. She said the family had hoped someone they knew in New York would take them in, but that plan did not work out. “We came here because they said they would help us find a place to sleep to not have to stay in the street,” Leidy said.

Easier? You don’t say.

Abbott said New York City Mayor Eric Adams could provide services and housing for the new arrivals.

“I hope he follows through on his promise of welcoming all migrants with open arms so that our overrun and overwhelmed border towns can find relief,” Abbott said in a statement.

Let the progressives in NYC put their money where they’re mouths are.

Oh, and this one is hilarious

“With no plan for what came next.” I don’t think they really care, since Democrats were fine with unfettered illegal immigration in border towns

Read: Funny: Buses From Texas Carrying Illegals Arrive In NYC »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Your Fault: Kids Have Lower Fitness Due To Climate Crisis (scam)

By William Teach August 5, 2022 – 3:00 pm

There couldn’t be a lot of other reasons for lower fitness in kids, right? Not according to the Cult of Climastrology

Climate change causing poorer fitness in children: study

climate change joke

Warming global temperatures — fueled by climate change — are making children less physically fit and more obese than ever before, a new study has found.

And it’s a two-way street: physical fitness is also key to tolerating higher temperatures.

A less active lifestyle caused by higher temperatures is putting kids at greater risk of suffering from heat-related health problems, including dehydration, heat cramps, heat exhaustion and heat stroke, according to the study, published in the journal Temperature on Friday.

“As the world warms, children are the least fit they have ever been,” author Shawnda Morrison, an environmental exercise physiologist at Slovenia’s University of Ljubljana, said in a statement.

“It is imperative that children are encouraged to do daily physical activity to build up, and maintain, their fitness, so that they enjoy moving their bodies and it doesn’t feel like ‘work’ or ‘a chore’ to them,” she added.

If only we could Do Something!

Today’s climate change policies are failing to address child health needs, Morrison argued, stressing the critical nature of encouraging kids to make exercise an everyday part of their lives.

This is a joke, right? Do kids notice the difference between 80F and 81.5F? We’d go outside regardless of the temperatures. We’d be ice skating and sledding when it was super cold. We’d be riding bikes and playing in the woods and all sorts of things when it was hot. Today, it’s that physical fitness is not stressed. In fact, this whole “body positivity” thing is pushed so far to the extreme that it is not only OK to be overweight, and even obese, it’s lauded. Heck, even lots of young kids who aren’t fat look like they haven’t exercised, just no muscle at all, soft and flabby.

New Report Finds U.S. Kids Are Horribly Out of Shape

The  National Physical Activity Plan Alliance recently released its 2016 Report Card on Physical Activity for Youth and Children. And the results are dismal.

American children are performing horribly in fitness criteria across the board.

A few of the lowlights include:

  • Kids don’t do enough intense activity. Only 43 percent of kids from ages 6 to 11 participate in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for 60 minutes on five days out of the week. And it gets worse as kids get older. The numbers drop to 8 percent for ages 12 to 15 and 5 percent for ages 16 to 19.
  • Kids get too much screen time. Fewer than half of kids spend two hours or less in front of a screen each days. It gets worse as kids get older, dropping to lower than a third.
  • Kids are out of shape. Only 50 percent of boys and 34 percent of girls are able to pass cardiorespiratory physical fitness standards.

Kids are not encouraged, or, let’s face it, forced to get outside and exercise anymore. They spend too much time gaming, playing on their phones, taking selfies, doing social media. Even when they’re going outside, it’s to find the perfect spot to take an Instagram photo.

As young children become teenagers, the results get even worse. You can expect that teenagers will drop out of sports as they get older and opportunities to play decrease, but they’re not replacing sports with other physical activity.

Look, I fell into this trap for years, with the rise of the Internet and easy gaming. When I was a kid, I was forced to put the games down and turn the TV off and get exercise. And, mostly, we wanted to go out and play. To surf, fish, bike, sail, all sorts of things. I make sure to get my 10K steps a day and get to the gym at least 4-5 times a week. I can mix reading my books, which I am super-happy to do, with using the treadmill or bike. I’ll even read it on my phone while going for a couple mile walk on the greenway. Kids these days seemingly rarely walk or bike to school. Or do much of anything.

It’s not anthropogenic climate change, or even natural climate change: it’s society and technology.

Read: Your Fault: Kids Have Lower Fitness Due To Climate Crisis (scam) »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach August 5, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…is a lovely low carbon bike, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on Karine Jean-Pierre failing basic civics.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Sinema Agrees To “Inflation Reduction Act” With Removal Of Carried Interest Provision

By William Teach August 5, 2022 – 10:30 am

I debated whether to add this to the previous post or make it a standalone. It’s important enough to stand alone

Democrats Drop Carried Interest as Sinema Paves Way for Tax Vote

The path was nearly cleared for one of the cornerstones of President Joe Biden’s domestic agenda after Democrats agreed on a revised version of their tax and climate bill.

But it came at a price: To get the support of Senator Kyrsten Sinema — the pivotal Democratic vote in the 50-50 Senate — a levy on wealthy hedge fund managers had to be abandoned.

So the Democrats agreed to drop a provision that would have narrowed a tax break for carried interest, meaning wealthy private equity managers and venture capitalists will continue to be able to pay a lower capital gains rate on one of their main forms of compensation. Lawmakers will also alter a 15% minimum tax on corporations and add a new 1% excise tax on stock buybacks.

Democrats have been eager to finish work on the legislation, even though it’s been drastically scaled back from Biden’s original vision for an expansive tax and social spending package that would advance the party’s climate goals.

So, unless the Congressional Parlimentarian comes back and says “no, this is not a bill that can be done via reconciliation”, it will pass. If there are issues

That means things like the domestic content requirements for cars eligible for electric vehicle tax credits, caps on insulin out-of-pocket costs and penalties for drug companies raising prices higher than inflation could be struck. That would dilute the bill even further.

Perhaps one of the Democrats will resist over the IRS provision? Like the one which will increase the number of agents by 87,000, which means middle class individuals and businesses will receive more scrutiny and audits. And

(Forbes) The IRS has been working on digital asset compliance for years, but an infusion of funds could allow the agency to rather significantly step up its efforts, as well as its criminal investigations.

So, if you have some sort of crypto, the IRS will want to have a conversation with you. Does anyone, other than the White House, think that The Rich will be the ones receiving the scrutiny of the IRS? You know, the people who donate to politicians and have the ability to fight back?

Maybe Comrade Bernie will vote against the bill?

Bernie Sanders pummels Manchin’s inflation deal for 2nd day in a row, saying it does ‘virtually nothing’ to help families

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont continues lambasting the $740 billion climate, energy, and tax package that Democrats are hoping to pass in the coming days, arguing it doesn’t amount to major relief to American families.

“As currently written, this is an extremely modest bill that does virtually nothing to address the enormous crises facing the working families of our country,” Sanders said in a Wednesday floor speech. “It falls far short of what the American people want, what they need, and what they are begging us to do.”

It marks the second day in a row that the Vermont independent has advocated for a wide range of Democratic initiatives from the now-defunct Build Back Better Act — including the extension of the child tax credit, universal pre-K, medicare expansion, and tuition-free community college. With regards to climate change, Sanders read a letter Wednesday from the Center for Biological Diversity that called the proposed bill a “climate suicide pact.”

“In my view, we have got to do everything possible to take on the greed of the fossil fuel industry, not give billions of dollars in corporate welfare to an industry that has been destroying our planet,” the Senator said.

At the end of the day, despite all his bluster in wanting more government, he’ll vote for it. So, unless one or more Democrats who are up for re-election this year in purple states say “no”, it will pass. And you, the U.S. middle class, will pay for it.

Read: Sinema Agrees To “Inflation Reduction Act” With Removal Of Carried Interest Provision »

Posted in Democrats | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Tonga Eruption Put Huge Amount Of Water Vapor In Atmosphere, Which Is, Surprisingly, A Greenhouse Gas

By William Teach August 5, 2022 – 7:15 am

In fact, water vapor is the number one greenhouse gas

Tonga eruption blasted enough water to fill 58,000 Olympic pools into the Earth’s atmosphere, NASA says

One of the most powerful volcanic eruptions on the planet blasted such a massive amount of water vapor high into the atmosphere that it’s likely to temporarily warm the Earth’s surface, according to detections from a NASA satellite.

When the undersea Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano erupted on January 15, 40 miles (65 kilometers) north of Tonga’s capital, it created a tsunami as well as a sonic boom that rippled around the world — twice.

The eruption sent a tall plume of water vapor into the stratosphere, which is located between 8 and 33 miles (12 and 53 kilometers) above the Earth’s surface. It was enough water to fill 58,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools, according to detections from a NASA satellite.

They estimate that the eruption delivered 146 teragrams of water to the stratosphere. One teragram is the equivalent of a trillion grams, and in this case, it was equal to 10% of the water already present in the stratosphere.

Hmm, that couldn’t have anything to do with causing a lot of sustained heat in the norther hemisphere and a lot of really wet weather in the southern at the moment, could it?

Typically, powerful volcanic eruptions like Mount Pinatubo or the 1883 Krakatoa event in Indonesia cool Earth’s surface temperature because the gas, dust and ash they spew reflects sunlight into space. This “volcanic winter” happened after the Mount Tambora eruption in 1815, triggering “the year without a summer” in 1816.

The Tonga eruption was different because the water vapor it sent into the atmosphere can trap heat, which could cause warmer surface temperatures. The excess water vapor could stay in the stratosphere for several years, according to the researchers.

The hell you say! Of course, CNN, being the good little climate cult news organization they are looks to dispel the effect

Fortunately, the warming effect of the water vapor is expected to be small and temporary, and will dissipate as the extra vapor diminishes. The researchers don’t believe it will be enough to exacerbate existing conditions due to the climate crisis.

Read: Tonga Eruption Put Huge Amount Of Water Vapor In Atmosphere, Which Is, Surprisingly, A Greenhouse Gas »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 22 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove