I still say the best response would be for the companies to simply stop selling their product to the cities, counties, and states that are suing them. If they want to go extreme, just don’t sell any of their products in those states, which would include gas, diesel, and motor oils
Suing over climate change: Taking fossil fuel companies to court
If climate change were a disaster film, it would likely be accused of being too over-the-top: wildfires reducing entire towns to ashes, hurricanes swamping cities, droughts draining lakes and withering fields, and raging oceans redrawing the very maps of our coasts. And now, many cities and states are asking, who’s going to pay for all of this?
“This is real; we’re on the front line of climate change right here in Charleston,” said John Tecklenburg, the mayor of Charleston, South Carolina. The city’s been battered by an endless parade of floods due to sea level rise. Some desperate homeowners have resorted to raising their homes by several feet.
“In the next 50 years we’ll see another two to three feet of sea level rise,” Tecklenburg said. “The water is our greatest asset; it has also become our biggest challenge.”
According to the actual sea level measurements from NOAA, Charleston is at “3.39 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.19 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1901 to 2021 which is equivalent to a change of 1.11 feet in 100 years.” That’s a pretty good long term monitoring station, which shows no acceleration, and is pretty much in line with what should be happening during a Holocene warm period. So, not getting 2-3 feet in the next 50 years, Mr. Scaremongerer. Actual data is inconvenient for the climate cult, which is why they never show it.
Underneath one of those rocks are the fossil fuel companies. Study after study has shown the companies’ carbon emissions from oil, coal and gas are major contributors to climate change.
Charleston is one of more than two dozen cities, counties and states that are suing these companies (including ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP and ConocoPhillips).
Tecklenburg said, “I feel if you’ve contributed to the problem, that you should contribute to the solution.”
So, then, why aren’t all these governments giving up their own use? They could simply refuse to allow the sale of these products in their areas. Their governments could stop using them, right? But, that would be inconvenient, especially for the politicians and elites who want to go on nice trips. Oh, and how much of Charleston’s economy depends on tourism, which requires people to drive and flying? That would be around 24%, to the tune of over $8 billion annually. How about all the fossil fuels to bring in all the seafood and other foods and drink? Those boats aren’t wind powered.
“So, in some ways, it is a bit of a money grab?” asked Tracy.
“Well, to the extent that they participated in what created this need; it’s a money grab because there’s some responsibility for what happened.”
Of course it is. A shakedown. If you’re company was getting sued, would you do business with the plaintiff?
Read: Democrat Run Governments, Who Won’t Give Up Using Fossil Fuels, Sue Oil Companies »