Bummer: Marijuana Is Bad For The Climate Crisis (scam)

Again, I really do not care if people smoke marijuana, just don’t blow it on me. I don’t think it’s that bad, and the science says that many drugs, including alcohol, are far worse. Like Ted Cruz, I think it should be left up to the states to decide. That said, the Cult of Climastrology always finds a way to inject themselves into issues, being the big buzz kills they are, and this is no different. Previously, I’ve seen small websites jump in, now we have the big boys involved

An inconvenient truth (about weed)

Marijuana has never been more popular in the U.S. — and its carbon emissions have never posed a bigger threat to the climate.

America’s patchwork approach to legalizing weed has helped make cannabis cultivation one of the most energy-intensive crops in the nation. And as states increasingly embrace marijuana, a growing source of greenhouse gases is going essentially unnoticed by climate hawks on Capitol Hill.

Nationally, 80 percent of cannabis is cultivated indoors with sophisticated lighting and environmental controls designed to maximize the plant’s yield. It’s a setup that can consume up to 2,000 watts of electricity per square meter, 40 times what it takes for leafy greens like lettuce, when grown indoors.

“For being such a ‘green’ industry, there’s some skeletons in the closet,” said Kaitlin Urso, an environmental consultant with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.

One recent model estimated that Massachusetts’ nascent cannabis industry represented 10 percent of the state’s industrial electricity consumption in 2020. Another study found that growing enough bud for a joint — a gram — consumes as much electricity as driving about 20 miles in a fuel-efficient car. Then there’s the still-vibrant illegal market — where there are no emissions rules whatsoever — that consumes fossil fuels at an even higher rate, often using standalone generators or stealing power from neighbors to fuel their operations.

The problem is only going to get worse.

Damned if you do damned if you don’t. I wonder what this will do to the Democrat’s push to legalize marijuana all across the country: which push is more important to them, climate crisis (scam) or getting stoned?

Over the past year, nine states, including New York, approved the production and sale of either medical or recreational marijuana. That means 100 million Americans — nearly a third of the country — now live in a state where weed is legal for anyone over the age of 21. But most cultivators in those states will be growing cannabis indoors because of climate, regulations or individual business preferences, laying the groundwork for skyrocketing electricity consumption created by the new markets.

They grow it indoors because it produces a better product, rather than outdoors. You can do this with pot, versus something like oranges.

Interstate trade is the backbone of efficiency for most products Americans consume. But cannabis, while now allowed in many states, remains illegal on the federal level, creating siloed markets that can only serve local demand and whose economics are difficult to calibrate.

I would have thought that would be better for Hotcoldwetdry, since it limits the fossil fueled transportation.

To reach Biden’s 2050 climate goal, the nation has to do just about everything right. Every fossil fuel power plant will need to close or capture its carbon emissions; millions of buildings will need to abandon fossil fuels for electric appliances; all new cars on the road will need to be electric. Any sector going in the wrong direction, especially a rapidly growing one like cannabis, will hamper progress toward that goal.

Or, you can just F off and mind your own business. Stop trying to push your cult on everyone.

Many climate advocates say legalizing cannabis on the federal level, especially before more states create new markets, would be the quickest way to ease the emissions problem, but the bill with the best odds is still a long shot. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced a legalization measure last month that does not yet have the votes to pass.

This is really all about shifting control from state and local hands to the Central Government, yet another takeover by the federal government.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) had more specific concerns. As more states, and potentially the federal government, move toward legalization, the progressive icon said she would prioritize ensuring small businesses have an opportunity to grab major market share in the nascent industry and access to efficiency upgrades to make them competitive.

She does have a point. If Los Federales legalize it you’re going to see big companies get involved, driving out small business. But, small business would still be driven out as they wouldn’t be able to afford or comply with climate cult policies.

Read: Bummer: Marijuana Is Bad For The Climate Crisis (scam) »

If All You See…

…is a horrible fossil fueled boat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is White House Dossier, with a post on Biden starting to tank with Independents.

Read: If All You See… »

Senate Democrats Approve $3.5 Trillion America Changing Reconciliation Package

Good job, 19 Republicans who voted for the $1.2 trillion “infrastructure” bill: that will be used to pass the insane $3.5 trillion America changing bill

Senate passes framework of $3.5T budget reconciliation package in party-line vote

Illegitimate President Joe BidenThe Senate voted early Wednesday to pass the framework of the hotly contested, $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package after a nearly 15-hour-long vote-a-rama in Washington, D.C., and if there was any camaraderie on the bipartisan infrastructure bill, it seemed to have taken a holiday after this vote.

The vote was procedural and the initial step in the budget reconciliation process that could eventually allow Democrats to pass the package without a single Republican vote. The vote on Wednesday was 50-49, and straight down party lines.

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., said the resolution paves the way “for legislation that would redefine the very role of the federal government in the lives of average Americans, all under a 50-50 Senate, a razor-thin majority in the House, and a President who was elected on moderation.”

“After Democrats shamelessly used COVID as an excuse to pass a partisan $2 trillion liberal wish-list in March, Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders has brought the rest of his party along for another $3.5 trillion that seeks to increase dependency of the middle class on the federal government, re-engineer the economy to benefit liberal interest groups, and provide tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy in Democrat-run states,” Toomey said in a statement.

Well, you and the rest of the Senate Republicans should have worked to stop the 19 idiots from voting for the initial “infrastructure” deal.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., praised the vote and said the budget will “bring a generational transformation on how our economy works for average Americans.”

“It’ll cut taxes for American families, it’ll lower costs for everyone,” the Senate majority leader said. “It’ll create good paying jobs while tackling climate change. And it will be paid for by making our tax code more progressive and more fair, asking corporations in the wealthy to pay their fair share.”

It’ll see corporations pass on those taxes to Americans. And cause lots and lots of companies to move their registration to other countries.

(Breitbart) The $3.5 trillion represents a top line budget number, which includes many items self-designated socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) facies, such as expanding medicare, global warming initiatives, and suburb displacement with low-income housing, subsidized housing, subsidized childcare, and subsidized racial equity and environmental justice.

There is, as you know, lots and lots of Progressive crazy in that bill, and they’ll add lots and lots more of Progressive (nice Fascism) crazy into it. It will, as Chuck says “bring a generational transformation”, not just of our economy, but how the federal government controls your life. And, I have to wonder, will the passage finally cause a split in the nation, where Red states say “enough, we’re no longer dealing with this”? That the U.S. is no longer the nation as deemed in the Constitution, hence, split it? Especially when they are going to take another shot at passing their For The People Act, a virtual takeover of all elections by the Federal government. Which they might try and slip into the $3.5 trillion, along with mass amnesty.

Read: Senate Democrats Approve $3.5 Trillion America Changing Reconciliation Package »

UK To Relax Chinese Coronavirus Rules For U.N. Climate Conference

If you thought some of the rules during lockdown here in the U.S. were crazy, like Michigan governor Whitmer blocking the sale of non-essential items like seeds, Britain was completely nuts (as were other countries). And lots of their restrictions and rules have not been relaxed all that much. But, hey, the U.K. has to get ready for 25,000 or so people to come to Glasgow in fossil fueled vehicles and planes!

Rules for Thee and Not for Me: UK to Relax Travel Restrictions for UN Climate Conference

Overseas delegates for the UN’s COP26 climate conference in Scotland will be subjected to more relaxed coronavirus travel rules than normal travellers, an official has confirmed.

Up to 25,000 government figures, media, and environmental campaigners from around the world will descend on Glasgow, Scotland, in the first two weeks of November for the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, after British Prime Minister Boris Johnson determined that, despite the ongoing Chinese coronavirus pandemic, a meeting in person would achieve more than an environmentally-friendly virtual summit to stop alleged manmade climate change.

Easing of restrictions for those attending the climate conference, many of whom will be flying to the UK in aeroplanes emitting massive amounts of CO2, will include a shorter quarantine period for vaccinated delegates travelling from red list high coronavirus-risk countries and no self-isolation for those coming from amber or green list countries.

“This includes a reduced quarantine period of five days for vaccinated individuals from red list countries,” a COP26 official confirmed, according to Reuters. “There will be no requirement for self-isolation on arrival to the UK for those coming from amber or green list countries whether vaccinated or not.”

Most travellers to the summit will be arriving in the UK in London. Under current travel rules in England, you are recommended against travelling to red list countries — the vast majority Asian, African, and Latin American — and are only allowed to enter the country from those nations if you are a British or Irish citizen or have residency rights.

Well, most of the people traveling to the UN IPCC Conference on the Parties are climahypocrites, so, might as well be covid-hypocrites to boot. The requirement now is for ten day isolation for those from red list countries. Even if vaccinated. You just know that there will be lots and lots of climate cultists, especially the big wigs, who will not be wearing masks.

The rules for several days of self-isolation while waiting for a negative test, even for the vaccinated, have also been relaxed for amber and green countries. I can’t wait for the photo-ops from world leaders like

And all the photos of the private jets flown to the U.K.

Read: UK To Relax Chinese Coronavirus Rules For U.N. Climate Conference »

Moderate Joe Looking To See If He Can Override Mask Mandate Bans

Dementia Joe Biden, “elected” on a platform of being a moderate (snicker), doesn’t have the legal or Constitutional power to implement a mask mandate nationwide to start with, except within the Executive Office. Which he did. Which he and many of his people constantly blow off. He seems upset that some governors have instituted mask mandate bans

Biden ‘checking’ if he has power to intervene against Florida and Texas mask mandate bans

President Joe Biden said he is “checking” on if his presidential powers could give him the ability to intervene in states banning mask mandates.

“I don’t believe that I do thus far. We’re checking that,” Biden said Tuesday when asked if he could intervene in states such as Texas and Florida that have banned mask mandates. “But there are — federal workforce, I can.”

Biden’s remarks came after he addressed the issue of states that have banned public schools districts from imposing mask mandates for the upcoming school year. The president called such efforts “disingenuous,” arguing governors should allow districts to follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

“And I find it interesting that some of the very people who are saying that, who hold government positions, are people who are threatening that if a schoolteacher asks a student if they have been vaccinated, or if a principal says that ‘everyone in my school should wear a mask’ or the school board votes for it, that governor will nullify that — that governor has the authority to say, ‘You can’t do that,’” Biden said.

Governors do have that power, within both the federal and state constitutions (whether they actually have the power to institute a mask mandate in non-government areas, in outdoor settings, and more, is contested). That’s the way our system works. The federal Legislative and Executive office are not supposed to be this powerful. They weren’t assigned the power to override governors and states in most things. The mask mandate bans do not stop any citizen from wearing a mask (which mostly do no work). If teachers want to wear them, wear them. If parents want their kids to wear them, that’s their right. If other citizens want to wear one, wear one. A good percentage of people I see voluntarily wearing them fail to wear them correctly and/or are wearing ones that make zero difference.

“I find that totally counterintuitive and, quite frankly, disingenuous,” he added.

Biden said this while not wearing a mask. Surprise?

Read: Moderate Joe Looking To See If He Can Override Mask Mandate Bans »

Warmist Robert Reich Offers Solutions To The Climate Crisis (scam)

Robert Reich has long been a leading proponent of Big Government, so, it’s not surprising as to what solutions he has up his “green” sleeve

Robert Reich: The Solutions To The Climate Crisis No One Is Talking About – OpEd

In light of the latest IPCC report on climate change, it’s crucial we remember these four steps to avoiding a climate catastrophe.

First, create green jobs. Investing in renewable energy could create millions of family sustaining, union jobs and build the infrastructure we need for marginalized communities to access clean water and air.

If these jobs were so much in demand the private sector would creating them. What he’s talking about are government jobs, overpaid ones, that are unionized to create an incestuous relationship between the unions and Government

Second, stop dirty energy. A massive investment in renewable energy jobs isn’t enough to combat the climate crisis. If we are going to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, we must tackle the problem at its source: Stop digging up and burning more oil, gas, and coal.

Third, kick fossil fuel companies out of our politics. For decades, companies like Exxon, Chevron, Shell, and BP have been polluting our democracy by pouring billions of dollars into our politics and bankrolling elected officials to enact policies that protect their profits. The oil and gas industry spent over $103 million on the 2016 federal elections alone.

In other words, to hell with the Constitution, to hell with the principles this country was founded on, just straight up go for authoritarianism. Weird that Warmists like Reich won’t voluntarily give up their own use of “dirty energy”, eh?

Fourth, require the fossil fuel companies that have profited from environmental injustice to compensate the communities they’ve harmed. As if buying off our democracy wasn’t enough, these corporations have also deliberately misled the public for years on the amount of damage their products have been causing. If these solutions sound drastic to you, it’s because they are. They have to be if we have any hope of keeping our planet habitable. The climate crisis is not a far-off apocalyptic nightmare — it is our present day.

If you banned the fossil fuels companies, how do you get money from defunct businesses? Also, how do these big shot Warmists move around without limos and jets? This is straight up government theft of legally earned money. Nobody should be surprised by any of this, the Cult of Climstrology is not about science, but, politics

Silly Season at the UN: 1989 vs. 2021 Climate Doomsday (it’s all politics now)

UN 2021: 6th Climate Assessment

It’s all bad. it’s only going to get worse. It is civilization’s last chance. Red Alert for humankind….

But a massive energy transformation can avert the worst part. “The innovations in this report, and advances in climate science that it reflects,” said IPCC chair Hoesung Lee, “provide an invaluable input into climate negotiations and decision-making.”

That’s about all you need to know about the latest from the IPCC.

Going back

Reality Check: UN 1989

History matters. And in the climate debate, mankind’s long concern about climate and recent angst about global warming are worth revisiting for both perspective and optimism.

Reprinted below is an AP report from 1989 on the consensus of United Nations on climate change. I report; you decide ….

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

How’d that work out? they’ve been pushing this Doom since 1989. Lots more at the link.

Read: Warmist Robert Reich Offers Solutions To The Climate Crisis (scam) »

If All You See…

…is an elevated house to be safe from sea rise and floods in a dry world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View from the Beach, with a post on a female inmate being pregnant after being forced to share prison with gender confused men.

Read: If All You See… »

Hot New Idea To Force Vaccine Compliance: Businesses Charging More For Health Insurance

See, this idea is not really coming from business owners, but from government nags and advocacy groups (the original article is behind a USA Today paywall, but, available in full at Yahoo News)

Won’t get a COVID vaccine? Some bosses may charge you $20 to $50 more for health insurance on every paycheck

Tyson Foods, United Airlines, CNN, the U.S. military.

A wide variety of employers such as those four are imposing COVID vaccine mandates on their workers, and experts believe they’ll have a lot more company soon after the Food and Drug Administration gives the shots its full approval.

Some employers aren’t ready to impose mandates but may still penalize workers for not getting vaccinated, possibly by requiring them to pay an insurance surcharge costing several hundred dollars a year.

“I think they’ve decided that in order to get that needle to move, they need to do something more,” said Wade Symons, leader of the regulatory resources group at Mercer, an employee benefits consultancy. Big snip)

Could I face other penalties for not getting vaccinated?

Yes. This could include a surcharge on your health insurance.

Mercer’s Symons said clients have been contacting him asking about how to charge vaccinated employees more for their insurance to cover the costs of massive hospital bills.

“It’s something we’ve just started getting questions about in the last couple of weeks,” Symons said. “The number of questions has been surprising in the volume. This is something they’re more willing to take on. It’s less than a mandate.”

Symons estimated that some workers could face an additional $20 to $50 per paycheck, though he said he would expect it to be on the lower end of that scale.

The unvaccinated would then be looking at hundreds of extra dollars a year for failing to Comply. BTW, how would they know? Those vaccination records are supposed to be private and not shared with companies or health insurance providers.

Could vaccine mandates backfire on employers?

Definitely. Employers recognize that resistance is particularly strong in some quarters. Nearly 3 in 10 American adults still haven’t gotten at least one dose.

Because vaccinations have become a political issue for a portion of Americans who continue to refuse them, employers could face mass resignations if they require shots. (Other employees are hesitant due to safety concerns and other fears.)

On the flip side, where do they go if lots and lots of employers in their field require vaccination, especially when the FDA approves the vaccines? Meanwhile, what the hell is this?

PS: I recommend people get vaccinated. I’m not in favor of use of force to do so. You make your decision, I’ll make mine.

Read: Hot New Idea To Force Vaccine Compliance: Businesses Charging More For Health Insurance »

St. Greta Chimes In On UN’s Doomy Climate Report

It’s nice to hear from a climate scientist like St. Greta, eh? Oh, right, she mostly blew off school, and has zero degrees. I thought her 15 minutes was up, that the Credentialed Media had used her up and spit her out, but, I guess she’s still a Useful Idiot

Greta Thunberg: Dire U.N. climate report confirms ‘we are in an emergency

The Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg said she wasn’t surprised by a blistering report released Monday by the United Nations, which concluded that the Earth is warming at a rate faster than previously thought and that the window to avoid a climate catastrophe is rapidly closing.

The report, issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, warned that the climate crisis is a “code red for humanity.”

“The new IPCC report contains no real surprises,” Thunberg tweeted. “It confirms what we already know from thousands [of] previous studies and reports — that we are in an emergency. It’s a solid (but cautious) summary of the current best available science.

“It doesn’t tell us what to do,” she added. “It is up to us to be brave and take decisions based on the scientific evidence provided in these reports. We can still avoid the worst consequences, but not if we continue like today, and not without treating the crisis like a crisis.”

What’s this “we” stuff? Most climate cultists refuse to do much more than change a few lightbulbs. It’s not science, it’s activism. What is it telling “us” to do?

What The U.S. Can Do About The Dire Climate Change Report

….

Climate scientist Allison Crimmins heads the National Climate Assessment, a government report that evaluates how the U.S. is doing on issues related to climate change. She spoke with NPR’s Noel King about her takeaways from today’s report. (snip)

“It’s not a policy statement but just a scientific statement, that if we want to limit global warming and we want to limit those sorts of impacts that are affecting Americans right now, we need strong rapid, sustained reductions in carbon dioxide and in methane and in other greenhouse gasses,” she says. (snip)

Crimmins says the report confirms that it’s going to require “significant, sustained action” to cut down on emissions.

She envisions that action as a combination of standards, investments and justice.

“I think we can hit these sort of emission targets and transform our energy system, transform the way we use energy and the way we get around, our transportation, the way we run our homes,” she says. “And I think we can do that while also making a safer, healthier, more just future.”

In other words, the government is going to force people to change their lives. They’re going to act as dictators. There will be a hell of a lot of surprised climate cultists, who expected the Bad Things to apply to Other People, not themselves.

Read: St. Greta Chimes In On UN’s Doomy Climate Report »

Helped By Idiots, Democrats Poised To Pass Their “Infrastructure” Bill Then Pass Their $3.5 Trillion Bill

I don’t get it, I really, really don’t get it. You had Republicans negotiating the so-called infrastructure bill, which gives Republicans virtually nothing and gives Democrats lots of their wish list, like all the climate scam garbage, green this and green that, electric cars, trains, etc and so on. You’ve seen the crazy. Yet

Schumer: ‘We have come to an agreement’ on infrastructure bill, vote expected Tuesday

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the Senate has “come to an agreement” on the infrastructure bill after months of deadlock.

“In a few minutes, I will announce that we have come to an agreement for final passage of the bipartisan infrastructure proposal,” Schumer said on the Senate floor on Monday night. “This will do a whole lot of good for America.”

Schumer laid out two tracks for the infrastructure bill: “One dealing with traditional infrastructure,” the bipartisan package some Republicans are likely to support; and “one dealing with climate and the problems American families face,” a more partisan Democratic measure.

There are apparently enough idiot Republicans to vote for this piece of garbage, which will be remembered come election time, and have Republicans sitting out in 2022. Especially since they all have to know they are being played. Schumer said so

Senate Poised to Pass Infrastructure Deal, Then Turn to Democratic Budget

The Senate is expected on Tuesday to pass a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package, capping off weeks of intense negotiations and debate over the largest federal investment in the nation’s aging public works system in more than a decade.

The legislation, which still must pass the House, would touch nearly every facet of the American economy and fortify the nation’s response to the warming of the planet.

Sounds great, right, the people who cannot work on a budget, overspend on most things, probably couldn’t account for the money they spend, and want control of the economy want to pass something that touches on nearly every facet of the American economy

But as soon as the bill clears the Senate, Democrats are expected to take up a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint that will unlock their ability to muscle through an expansive social policy package over unanimous Republican objections.

Under the fast-track budget reconciliation process, that blueprint, if passed with a simple majority, will dictate the parameters of a transformative package expected to provide funding for health care, climate change, education and child care, and to increase taxes on wealthy people and corporations.

Democrats are simply going to use the $1 trillion infrastructure bill as a means to pass the unhinged, Progressive, wish list $3.5 trillion bill (universal pre-K, amnesty and support of illegals/migrants, more taxes, free community college, and so much more). Republicans are literally helping the Progressive party (nice Fascism) pass their agenda.

Read: Helped By Idiots, Democrats Poised To Pass Their “Infrastructure” Bill Then Pass Their $3.5 Trillion Bill »

Pirate's Cove