Floods Hit European Towns, Immediately Blamed On You Refusing To Buy An EV

Climate change is here, y’all! We can stop it with a tax

European officials say ‘climate change has arrived’ as deadly floods engulf entire towns

European officials have said climate change contributed to this week’s extreme flooding, which has left entire towns submerged and more than 120 people dead.

Scientists have for decades warned that climate change will make extreme weather events, including heavy rain and deadly flooding, more likely.

Around 100 of those killed after torrential rainfall since Wednesday were in Germany’s western states of Rhineland-Palatinate and North Rhine-Westphalia, where local leaders are urging the world for swifter action on climate change as villages under their watch become a new and unexpected epicenter of global warming.

Neighboring Belgium has also been hit hard by the floods, which have killed 20 people in the country and could rise further, Interior Minister Annelies Verlinden said Friday at a press conference.

And, of course

Plenty more where that came from. Because of course the climate cult has to do this. Did carbon pollution cause

  • North Sea Flood of 1953 Netherlands, United Kingdom, killed around 2,000
  • Great Sheffield Flood, United Kingdom, killed 270
  • February flood of 1825, Germany, Netherlands, 800 dead
  • Saint Petersburg of 1824, killed 10,000
  • Christmas flood of 1717 Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Norway, 14,000 dead
  • St. Peter’s Flood, 1691, Netherlands, Northern Germany, 15,000 dead
  • All Saints’ Flood (1570), Netherlands, 20,000 dead

And many more, all before fossil fueled vehicles.

Read: Floods Hit European Towns, Immediately Blamed On You Refusing To Buy An EV »

If All You See…

…is coffee which will soon be ruined from the climate emergency, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is White House Dossier, with a post on Psaki saying users banned on one platform should be banned from all.

Read: If All You See… »

White House Is “Turning Up The Heat On COVID Misinformation”

Now, again, imagine this was the Trump White House doing this: how would CNN respond. In a blase’ manner, or full throated barking moonbat apoplexy?

White House turns up heat on Big Tech’s Covid ‘disinformation dozen’

spite houseThe White House turned up the pressure on Silicon Valley to get a handle on vaccine misinformation Thursday, specifically singling out 12 people one group dubbed the “disinformation dozen,” saying they were responsible for a great deal of misinformation about Covid-19.

“There’s about 12 people who are producing 65% of anti-vaccine misinformation on social media platforms,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday.

That statistic is from the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) which identified in a report published in March about a dozen people it said were super-spreaders of anti-vaccine misinformation.

The CCDH had at the time called on Facebook and Twitter to shut down all pages run by those people.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent figure in the anti-vaccine movement, is among the people whom the CCDH said should be kicked off social media.

CNN would be screeching about Fascism and authoritarianism and Trump turning into a dictator and that this is bad for Democracy and violates the 1st Amendment, as would the rest of the Credentialed Media. Pelosi and her Comrades would already be talking about impeachment. China Joe doing it? Crickets. Straight articles with zero condemnation. And it might not violate the actual letter of the 1st, but, it violates the spirit. Regardless, it is insane that the White House would be going after 12 people (and surely more) who dare use their Free Speech to put out their beliefs. They could be very wrong, and probably are wrong, but, it’s their Constitutional right to yammer.

CNN reported Thursday that meetings between the Biden administration and Facebook have grown “tense,” according to a person familiar with the conversations.

The person pointed specifically to Kennedy’s still-active Facebook account as an example of what some White House officials view as Facebook’s inaction regarding Covid-19 misinformation.

Kennedy’s Instagram was shut down, but, his Facebook is still up. It’s straight up Soviet Union style tactics, or, better, more modern, Chinese Communist government, tactics to do this.

Read: White House Is “Turning Up The Heat On COVID Misinformation” »

NY Times: Individuals Can Totally Do Their Part In Fighting Hotcoldwetdry

This NY Times article on Doing Something seems more like something from the first decade of the century in their ideas

In Fighting Climate Change, What’s an Individual to Do?

Climate change can seem like such an enormous problem that individual actions would have little impact. Consider Europe’s wide-ranging proposals this week to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels, including eliminating sales of new gas- and diesel-powered cars in the next 14 years.

But people can have an impact, experts say, both by how they spend their money and how they spend their time.

Mary Weathers Case, for instance, chose to offset the carbon cost of a cross-country plane trip for her family through the site Gold Standard. Dr. Case, a psychiatrist who lives in South Salem, N.Y., with her husband and two children, said she had been reading and watching more news about climate change during the pandemic and had been motivated to do her part after hearing about the searing temperatures in the West.

What surprised her, though, was that after spending $3,000 on plane tickets to Portland, Ore., she could offset that carbon for $150.

Or, they could simply not take fossil fueled flights. Carbon offsets are like paying tickets because you refuse to stop speeding. And most Warmists refuse to stop speeding. And most won’t pay for offsets for their world killing behavior.

With certain investments — namely those that reduce or remove carbon from the atmosphere — there are defined ways to measure their environmental impact. With others, like water conservation, the metrics are not as clear because there isn’t an agreed upon unit to measure.

Climate change has little to do with the environment.

When Leah Weinberg, owner and creative director of Color Pop Events, which plans weddings, was moving from Long Island City, N.Y., to Forest Hills in Queens, she found a company that had done away with cardboard boxes. Instead, the company, Movers, Not Shakers, provides the plastic, flip-top boxes that retailers like CVS use to deliver products to stores.

Using less cardboard is environmental. However, those plastic boxes are made with petrochemicals, and even if the trucks use biodiesel, that has been called bad for climate change, too.

This ethos can be woven into however people spend their money. Paul Greenberg, whose new book is “The Climate Diet: 50 Simple Ways to Trim Your Carbon Diet,” said continuing to work from home at least a few days a week was one significant way to reduce the carbon emissions from driving a car. But such decisions are not always so straightforward.

Take buying clothes. A shirt made with a synthetic material, like polyester, which is derived from petrochemicals, is more carbon-intensive than a cotton shirt. But that cotton shirt requires huge amounts of water to produce — more water than a person drinks in a year, Mr. Greenberg’s research found. His recommendation? Consider buying used clothing.

Some choices are harder than others. Dogs and cats may be beloved companions, but they are carnivores that are bad for the environment. “If you had a choice between a carnivorous dog and a guinea pig that eats seeds,” Mr. Greenberg said, “go with the guinea pig.”

My goodness, these people are nags, and just need to mind their own f’ing business. But, hey, you can also replace all your natural gas burning appliances. Because that’s cheap, right? And what happens to the old unit? They forget to mention that

Solar panels have grown in popularity, as their costs have fallen and their efficiency has increased. Milton Ross, who has owned a brownstone in Brooklyn’s Park Slope neighborhood since 1979, no longer has an electric bill because of the panels he had installed on his roof.

“My system back in 2015 was around $30,000,” Mr. Ross said. “My neighbors don’t do it because of the cost. I used my home equity line of credit, and I could claim the interest as a tax deduction. It just made sense to me. Meanwhile, everything is all paid back, and I don’t have an electric bill anymore.”

Well, sure, cheaper, but, can most people afford $10,000 plus to get some extra power for the house which won’t repay itself for decades?

Dr. Case said she would feel better when she and her family moved to Brooklyn this summer and got rid of one car and started walking more in their neighborhood. She’s also committed to buying things locally and not ordering them online.

Get rid of the other car. What can she buy locally? Most food and goods are grown/manufactured outside of NYC. These are just old miniscule ideas from well over a decade ago. Time for Warmists to practice what they preach. No fossil fueled travel, no AC, no ice makers, short showers, live in 300 square foot homes, no flushable toilets, and so much more.

Read: NY Times: Individuals Can Totally Do Their Part In Fighting Hotcoldwetdry »

Federal Judge Rules DACA Illegal, Just As Obama Stated

Remember this?

(Heritage) President Donald Trump has caught a lot of heat for rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program with a six-month wind-down. Few people seem aware that he’s ending an administrative amnesty for illegal aliens that President Barack Obama lacked the constitutional and legal authority to implement.

How do we know? Because even Obama admitted it – repeatedly.

Responding in October 2010 to demands that he implement immigration reforms unilaterally, Obama declared, “I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself.” In March 2011, he said that with “respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case.” In May 2011, he acknowledged that he couldn’t “just bypass Congress and change the (immigration) law myself. … That’s not how a democracy works.”

And now

DACA Ruled Unconstitutional, Rescuing Dreamers Moves to Congress

illegal alien DemocratThe DACA program protecting from deportation hundreds of thousands of “Dreamers” who came to the U.S. as children has suffered a major blow, after a federal judge ruled that it was implemented unconstitutionally.

U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Houston issued his ruling Friday in a suit brought by Republican-led states over the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which was implemented by the Obama administration on behalf of almost 650,000 Dreamers fighting to stay in the country.

“Although Congress may someday enact such a Dream Act, until it does, its continued failure to pass bills coextensive with the DACA population evinces a rejection of this policy,” Hanen said in a 77-page decision, which noted widespread sympathy for Dreamers. “As much as this court might agree with these sentiments, and as popular as this program might be, the proper origination point for DACA was, and is, Congress.”

None of the current Dreamers are set to be deported, and can acquire renewals, but, per the ruling, no new ones may be accepted. And the case goes to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is loaded with Trump appointees, and potentially going to the Supreme Court. No guarantee there

Hanen’s decision ultimately sets the case back on track to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in June 2020 that Trump couldn’t arbitrarily end DACA without following federal rule-making procedures and providing a good explanation. The Texas challenge asked the same legal question in reverse, whether former president Barack Obama violated federal procedures when he implemented DACA without congressional approval in 2012.

Trump was ending a program that was un-Constitutional and outside the power of the Executive Branch. Why would he need any explanation other than that. It does show that he needed better lawyers, though, because they did a terrible job.

As one of his first acts, President Joe Biden signed an executive order for the Homeland Security secretary to “preserve and fortify” DACA, and the agency says it will undergo the formal rule-making process Texas claims Obama illegally skipped. The U.S. House of Representatives has also passed a bill to give all DACA recipients lawful permanent residency, and a bipartisan companion bill that protects Dreamers is under consideration in the Senate.

This is really about creating more Democrat party voters. And DACA rewards the parents who brought the kids here illegally/overstayed their visas. Illegal alien activists can call it all “cruel”, but, we either have laws or we rule by feelings.

Read: Federal Judge Rules DACA Illegal, Just As Obama Stated »

If All You See…

…is a mountain where coffee will soon have to be grown because the lower altitudes are too hot, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Say Anything, with a post noting it’s time for people to pay their rent.

Read: If All You See… »

LA County To Reimpose Mask Mandate, Including For Vaccinated

Well, this should definitely incentivize more people to get the vaccine, right?

L.A. County will require masks indoors amid alarming rise in coronavirus cases

Just a month ago, Los Angeles County and the rest of California celebrated a long-awaited reopening, marking the tremendous progress made in the battle against COVID-19 by lifting virtually all restrictions on businesses and other public spaces. Now, the coronavirus is resurgent, and the nation’s most-populous county is scrambling to beat back the pandemic’s latest charge.

Starting Saturday night, residents will again be required to wear masks in indoor public spaces, regardless of their vaccination status.

The latest order not only puts the county further at odds with both the California Department of Public Health and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — both of which continue to maintain that vaccinated people need not cover their faces indoors — but puts officials in the precarious position of asking the inoculated to forfeit one of the benefits recently enjoyed.

“This is an all-hands-on-deck moment,” said Dr. Muntu Davis, the county’s health officer.

Vaccinated people are, in essence, being asked to make a sacrifice to help slow coronavirus spread among the unvaccinated.

Officials have stressed that those who have been inoculated have an excellent chance of being protected, even from the easily spread Delta variant, believed to be twice as transmissible as the conventional coronavirus strains. Between Dec. 7 and June 7, the unvaccinated accounted for 99.6% of L.A. County’s coronavirus cases, 98.7% of COVID-19 hospitalizations and 99.8% of deaths.

We keep being told that it is the unvaccinated who are at risk, that the majority of cases are the unvaccinated. So, why tell the vaccinated that they must mask up? Further, how well did masks help? They didn’t stop COVID19 infections or deaths. In many areas the infections and deaths were higher than before the mask mandates.

But officials suspect that unvaccinated people have stopped wearing masks in indoor public settings and businesses, even though they’re still required to do so.

The new mask order, Davis said, “really is about making this a universal practice. It’s the easiest thing to do in terms of ensuring that we’re all protected, regardless of the risks that we have.”

One question I’m not seeing answered is if this only applies to areas under LA County control, which would exclude the individual cities, or applies to the cities themselves, which the county usually has little to no control over.

But there’s undoubtedly a segment of the population that’s steadfastly opposed to getting inoculated — either for personal or political reasons, or because they’ve come to believe some of the vaccine disinformation that’s spread widely on social media.

Experts say it is possible to persuade people to get the shot. About 1 in 5 adults say they’re now vaccinated after being previously reluctant, according to a national survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation, and many of them said that conversations with family, friends and doctors helped.

Will it persuade the unvaccinated to get the shot when the Government slaps the vaccinated with restrictions? By the way, why wait till Sunday if this is so darned important?

Read: LA County To Reimpose Mask Mandate, Including For Vaccinated »

Climate Crisis (scam) Is Going Down When Voters Notice The Costs And Restrictions

Doing Something about Hotcoldwetdry is Very Important in theory. In practice, voters tend to shoot it down, and few Warmists actually practice what they preach. They mostly think Someone Else, That Guy, Other People should pay the price, and when they realize all the taxes, fees, and restrictions on their own lives will happen, they vote against legislation

The Climate-Change Agenda Goes Out With a Bang

We’re supposed to view this week as a banner occasion in the annals of climate change. The European Union unveiled a mammoth new plan to control carbon emissions, while Beijing rolled out an emissions-trading scheme and the U.K. released a plan to green up transportation.

Except this is all happening as climate politics seem to be undergoing a rapid and significant shift in many places, and not in the direction environmental activists hoped. To wit: Voters have started noticing how much they’re each going to have to spend to reduce carbon emissions, and they don’t like it.

It’s a startlingly broad phenomenon. The Swiss last month rejected a referendum to impose a fuel tax and a tax on airline tickets. The British cabinet, which on Wednesday proposed major new carbon restrictions for transport industries, also is split over previously announced plans to ban gas-fired home heating and require landlords to boost energy efficiency in rental units.

The EU hadn’t even unveiled its marquee new climate package this week before furious lobbying erupted in opposition from almost everyone. French officials sound particularly alert to the danger, and no wonder. President Emmanuel Macron has seen his agenda knocked off course for the better part of three years by grassroots protests against a diesel tax hike that started in 2018.

Meanwhile in Japan, climate-minded shareholders have just wrapped up a disastrous (for them) season of annual shareholder meetings. Resolutions codifying aggressive corporate carbon targets were defeated at all three companies where activists proposed them—Mitsubishi UFJ, Sumitomo and Kansai Electric Power.

Wall Street Journal writer Joseph C. Sternberg offers his own reasons for why this tends to occur, including a big drop in CO2 output in 1st World Nations without all sorts of climate crazy legislation. You can read the rest here, since the WSJ is behind a paywall. But, really, it does come down to it being about theory vs practice. We’ve seen this happen. Washington governor Jay Inslee made ‘climate change’ a huge part of his campaign for gov, the citizens seemed very interested, but, when it came time to encode it in law, the people said “no thanks!” As excited as Democrats were for Jay to be the ‘climate change’ candidate, he bombed badly in the 2020 primaries for president. As did Tom Steyer when he joined the crowd and made his campaign all about Hotcoldwetdry.

After implementing all sorts of climate scam policies, the ruling Labor Party was defeated so badly in 2012 that they weren’t even considered a recognized political party. “Labor suffered one of the worst defeats of a state government since Federation, and the worst defeat of a sitting government in Queensland history. From 51 seats in 2009, it was reduced to only seven seats..” People do not want to pay the piper in practice. They do not want to have to deal with the consequences in their own lives for climate crisis (scam) legislation.

Read: Climate Crisis (scam) Is Going Down When Voters Notice The Costs And Restrictions »

Fascism Joe Admin Flagging Facebook Posts

There’s a very simply exercise: how would the media and Democrats react had it been the Trump admin doing this?

Critics slam the White House after Psaki reveals it’s consulting with Facebook to ‘flag misinformation’

Critics roundly condemned the White House after press secretary Jen Psaki revealed the Biden administration is working with Facebook to flag “problematic” posts that “spread disinformation” on COVID-19.

On Thursday, Psaki was asked a question regarding the Biden administration’s request for tech companies to be more “aggressive” when policing what they referred to as “misinformation.” Psaki revealed that the White House is “in regular touch with social media platforms” to handle it.

“We are in regular touch with the social media platforms and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff and also members of our COVID-19 team — given, as Dr. Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue, of misinformation, specifically on the pandemic,” Psaki explained.

While referencing the team’s actions, Psaki also revealed that they are “flagging” posts on Facebook as part of their efforts.

Had the Trump admin done this we would have gotten Category 5 Apoplexy, with Pelosi and her House Comrades threatening impeachment. The NY Times, Washington Post, and LA Times editorial boards would have written Very Upset editorials calling Trump a Fascist, that he was violating Free Speech and Destroying Democracy.

“Psaki says the White House has been flagging ‘problematic posts’ on Facebook they believe are misinformation about Wuhan coronavirus. Reminder: Fauci worked with Facebook to ban the lab leak theory, which is factual, for more than a year,” Fox News contributor Katie Pavlich tweeted.

Dan Gainor, of Media Research Center, said people being anti-vaccine is part of free speech and that Psaki is “against freedom.”

Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote a lengthy Twitter thread condemning the revelation from Psaki.

“If you don’t find it deeply disturbing that the White House is ‘flagging’ internet content that they deem ‘problematic’ to their Facebook allies for removal, then you are definitionally [sic] an authoritarian. No other information is needed about you to know that,” he wrote.

The story itself is mostly being ignored by the Credentialed Media, and will be so until Psaki walks it back and those outlets Blame Republicans for making a big deal of this.

Read: Fascism Joe Admin Flagging Facebook Posts »

Bummer: Boom Of Kentucky Turkey Vultures Is Your Fault For Refusing To Buy An EV

Don’t you feel ashamed of yourself?

Kansas Turkey Vulture Boom Could Be a Sign of Climate Change

….

If you’ve noticed more of these foreboding figures (Kentucky Turkey vultures) circling in the skies above you lately, you’re not imagining things. It might have something to do with climate change and the stench of rotting flesh, the Kansas News Service reports.

Chuck Otte, secretary of the Kansas Bird Records Committee and a Kansas State University extension agent in Geary County, described the scene in central Salina as one that’s become increasingly common across central and western Kansas.

“Go back into the ’80s and ‘90s,” Otte said, “and we just didn’t see that many turkey vultures in urban areas, even small towns.”

But over the past two decades, committees of vultures have begun to descend upon Kansas in greater numbers.

While other species of birds have seen their populations freefall, Otte said the population of turkey vultures has doubled nationwide since 1966. And because the birds are federally protected, harming them or their nests is prohibited.

See, it couldn’t be due to their populations increasing due to the federal protection (which, isn’t that rather the f’ing point?????), nope, it’s because of a slight 1.5F degree increase in the global temperature over 170 years

“For dead animals to start decaying,” Otte said, “you need to have heat.”

Turkey vultures have the largest olfactory systems of all birds and can smell decaying flesh from over a mile away. But during colder months, Kansas roads can’t warm roadkill enough to get it rotting.

So historically, winter sightings of turkey vultures in Kansas were virtually unheard of. But Otte said climate change could eventually make Kansas a welcoming year-round habitat.

Wait, they come when it’s warm? Huh. Soon, though doom!

The growth and spread of civilization can also invite vultures to set up shop in cities and towns where maybe there didn’t used to be much rotting meat lying around.

“We have more cars, and cars and animals have collisions on the roadways,” Otte said. “That provides more food for them.”

And it’s the fault of all those people driving fossil fueled vehicles!

Read: Bummer: Boom Of Kentucky Turkey Vultures Is Your Fault For Refusing To Buy An EV »

Pirate's Cove