Hamas Mulling Over Ceasefire Plan, Wants Some Amendments

Release the hostages immediately, surrender. That should be the ceasefire plan

Hamas responds to Gaza cease-fire plan, seeking ‘amendments’

Hamas said Tuesday that it gave mediators its reply to the U.S.-backed proposal for a cease-fire in Gaza, seeking some “amendments” on the deal. It appeared the reply was short of an outright acceptance that the United States has been pushing for but kept negotiations alive over an elusive halt to the eight-month war.

The foreign ministries of Qatar and Egypt — who have been key mediators alongside the U.S. — confirmed they had received Hamas’ response and said mediators were studying it.

“We’re in receipt of this reply that Hamas delivered to Qatar and to Egypt, and we are evaluating it right now,” White House national security spokesperson John Kirby told reporters in Washington.

Hamas spokesperson Jihad Taha said the response included “amendments that confirm the cease-fire, withdrawal, reconstruction and [prisoner] exchange.” Taha did not elaborate.

But while supporting the broad outlines of the deal, Hamas officials have expressed wariness over whether Israel would implement its terms, particularly provisions for an eventual permanent end to fighting and full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in return for the release of all hostages held by the militants.

If Hamas stops attacking Israel and Jews, they have little to worry about. If the Palestinian people would stop supporting a terrorist organization, stop being violent, there will be no problem. Anyhow, phase 2 is supposed to bring a permanent ceasefire. Politico, like many news outlets, fails to mention rather important information

Hamas demands a full Israeli withdrawal from the Rafah crossing, no permanent ceasefire

In Hamas’s response to the Israeli outline for the hostage deal, it demanded, among other things, a full Israeli withdrawal from the Rafah crossing and the Philadelphi Corridor, Al Jazeera reported on Tuesday. (snip)

Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Hezbollah-aligned channel Al Mayadeen that they had amended the ceasefire proposal to specify that it would not be permanent, in contravention of President Biden’s proposal.

They clarified that they would not accept any deal that did not include a total withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

Hamas also told Al Mayadeen that they considered disagreements between Israel and the US over the ceasefire proposal as “only tactical.”

In other words, the terrorist organization which runs Gaza, and seems to be in position to continue to run Gaza once hostilities (meaning Israel bombing the shit out of them) end, wants to be able to continue to attack Israel and Jews. Really, any ceasefire should include there being anyone other than Hamas in charge of Gaza, and international monitors (not the UN) to make sure they aren’t using infrastructure like water pipes to make rockets, that they aren’t storing weapons in mosques, schools, and hospitals.

Meanwhile, their terrorist comrades to the north aren’t having fun, either

Read: Hamas Mulling Over Ceasefire Plan, Wants Some Amendments »

Good News: New AC Units Will Use Flammable Refrigerants

Sounds like a great idea, eh? Something catching on fire right next to your house. All for a fake issue

Air conditioners to start using slightly flammable refrigerant soon

Big changes are coming to the way you keep your house cool. The type of refrigerant currently used in HVAC systems is being phased out.

The 2020 American Innovation and Manufacturing Act directed manufacturers to make air conditioners that use A2L refrigerant starting January 1, 2025.

Because of that, air conditioners had to be redesigned to accept the new refrigerant, which is considered slightly flammable.

If your first question is “flammable?” and your second question is, “What does this mean for my current HVAC system?” 5 On Your Side has you covered.

“The current refrigerant, 410A, has a high global warming potential,” Jenna McClintock, of McClintock Heating & Cooling, said of the reason for the change.

A2L is more flammable than the refrigerant currently being used, so air conditioning units had to be overhauled for safety.

Fortunately, there will be new detectors in the units, which surely won’t add to cost, right? Because you’re already paying more for using A2L in AC units vs the old 410A standard. In fairness, it was already in use for many automobiles and small AC units, but, we’re talking large home units which have already gone up a couple thousand due to more stringent federal standards. And, certainly, the feds wouldn’t do something like ban the manufacture of 410A, meaning repairs cannot be done, right? All for a scam.

It should be mentioned that A2L is almost a good a refrigerant as 410A, the difference is miniscule, so, not exchanging a really good one for a so-so.

Read: Good News: New AC Units Will Use Flammable Refrigerants »

Bidenconomy: Credit Card Debt Rising Fast

I’ve been reliably told that the economy is great and everyone is making a ton of money

Credit card delinquencies are rising. Here’s what to do if you’re at risk

 Seriously overdue credit card debt is at the highest level in more than a decade, and people 35 and under are struggling more than other age groups to pay their bills.

The share of credit card debt that’s severely delinquent, defined as being more than 90 days overdue, rose to 10.7% during the first quarter of 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. A year ago, just 8.2% of credit card debt was severely delinquent.

Who was VP the last time this happened?

The average annual interest rate on a new credit card is 24.71%, according to LendingTree, the highest since the company began tracking in 2019. That’s in part because the Federal Reserve has raised its key interest rate rate to a 23-year high to combat the highest inflation in four decades, which peaked at 9.1% in June 2022.

Simultaneously, pandemic-era aid such as stimulus payments, the child tax credit, increased unemployment benefits, and a moratorium on student loan payments has ended. Wage gains haven’t all kept up with inflation, which hits lower-income consumers harder, and rent increases have eaten into savings some consumers may have built up during the early years of the pandemic.

Silvio Tavares, CEO of VantageScore, a credit score modeling and analytics company, said that delinquencies have now exceeded their pre-pandemic levels, and that renters are especially vulnerable to falling behind.

And all this debt and the late payments will effect people’s credit score, making it harder to get a loan and get an apartment.

Credit cards only make up about 6.5% of consumer debt, according to a Bank of America Global Research report, but the increase in delinquencies appears to be outpacing income growth.

Pretty much everything is outpacing income growth. Weirdly, the word “Biden” is not mentioned once. Can you imagine if this happened while Trump was president?

Read: Bidenconomy: Credit Card Debt Rising Fast »

California Looks To Seize Profits From Oil Companies

Might this be the point where gas and oil companies just say “OK, bye” and end operations in the People’s Republik Of California? Or, at least, refuse to sell to the state for their numerous operations, like for the governor’s limo and jet?

California looks to seize profits from Big Oil in climate change lawsuit

California will attempt to use consumer protection laws to seize some of the world’s biggest oil companies’ profits as part of a lawsuit accusing them of deceiving the public for decades over their role in climate change.

State attorney-general Rob Bonta invoked a new state law on Monday that allows claimants to target company profits that can be identified from the violation of consumer protection and advertising laws.

In an updated filing, it lists recent examples of alleged “false advertising and misleading environmental marketing by some of the defendants” and seeks profits they have generated to be deposited into a victims’ restitution fund.

The effort is part of a lawsuit that was launched by California against ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and ConocoPhillips last September, and broadly accuses fossil fuel companies of spreading misinformation, sowing doubt about climate science and claiming that some of their products are “clean”.

So, what happens? Sadly, none of them will say “see ya”. This will be bound up in lawsuits for a long time, and, let’s say the PRC wins: the cost of fossil fuels will skyrocket. It will all be passed on. Which means the cost of consumer goods will go up. Food, homes, clothes, you name it. I just wish companies would play hardball. Start pointing out that people are using the hell out of fossil fuels as they drive around, take the bus, take flights, go on boats? That 50% of every barrel goes to other than fuels? Explain how well government services will work if there is no fossil fuels. What happens with police, fire, emergency. With maintaining roads.

This is just a typical shady Democrat shakedown.

Read: California Looks To Seize Profits From Oil Companies »

If All You See…

…is marshland being inundated by a fast rising sea, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is 357 Magnum, with a post noting crimes in Oakland are keeping roads from being paved.

Read: If All You See… »

Weird: Colorado’s Legal Pot Market Is Crashing

I’ll not again that I am not against legalized marijuana. I don’t do it, but, if others want to, have at it. It’s certainly not as bad a drug as alcohol, though people do seem to be using it in some form or fashion way more throughout the day, kinda like an alcoholic sneaking sips. But, that’s their problem. But, what happens when government gets too heavily involved?

Colorado’s Weed Market Is Coming Down Hard and It’s Making Other States Nervous

On Jan. 1, 2014, Iraq War veteran Sean Azzariti made headlines worldwide as the first person in the U.S. to buy legal weed.

More than 10 years later, 3D Cannabis, the dispensary in Denver’s Elyria-Swansea neighborhood where the historic purchase was made, displays a makeshift sign announcing it is “temporarily closed.” The windows and doors on the side of the building have been boarded up. Plastic bags, discarded coffee cups and other trash collect in the corners of the abandoned parking lot.

The dismal state of the historic site is a fitting symbol of the plight of Colorado’s cannabis market. What once was a success story has now left a trail of failed businesses and cash-strapped entrepreneurs in its wake. Regulatory burdens, an oversaturated market and increasing competition from nearby states have all landed major blows, leaving other states with newer marijuana markets scrambling to avoid the same mistakes.

In 2020, the market soared to $2.2 billion. But just three years later, sales had plummeted to $1.5 billion, leading to layoffs, closures and downsizing. The market downturn has spelled trouble for state finances too: Colorado took in just $282 million in cannabis tax revenues in the last fiscal year, down more than 30 percent from two years earlier.

There are lots of issues, but, this is all a cautionary tale of how government doesn’t know how to run business. They artificially jacked the price up too high, placed too many burdens on companies, and failed to adapt. There are lots of reports that roughly 50% of the weed in states is illegally grown and sold. You have citizens allowed to grow small amounts for their own use. Why wouldn’t they? They counted on people coming from other states even with the knowledge that other states were going to pass their own legalization laws. They slapped on so many taxes that it was cheaper to buy from the black market. They gave out too many licenses, over-saturating the market.

Marijuana’s continued federal illegality is another added cost.

“280E is the biggest problem with the industry by far,” Gamet says, citing a federal tax code that prevents cannabis businesses from taking typical business deductions. “I’m very familiar with that because I’ve been audited every year since 2014. It’s a lot of lawyer expenses.”

Well, there is that. It’s still illegal federally, and Los Federales will treat it as such. It’s also a federal offense to cross state borders with marijuana.

Read: Weird: Colorado’s Legal Pot Market Is Crashing »

Lime Scooters To Place “No-Go Zone” Around Spokane Street Pride Paint

So, apparently, people are not going to be able to rent Lime scooters and….cross the street

Seriously, if you paint the roads people actually need to drive over them, right? From the article

Lime, a popular electric scooter and bike rental service, has announced it will be implementing a “no-go zone” around a crosswalk painted with a large Pride flag mural in Spokane, Washington. The crosswalk has become the center of much discussion after the arrest of multiple teens for making skid marks on the painted pavement.

On June 6, the Spokane Police Department announced the arrest of three teenagers on charges of 1st Degree Malicious Mischief, all in relation to the alleged vandalism of a Pride flag-painted crosswalk at the intersection of Howard Street and Spokane Falls Boulevard. (big snip)

Lime has now implemented a “no-go zone” over the crosswalk, meaning scooters driven over the mural will be remotely shut down. According to the company’s website, entering a “no-go zone” will cause a Lime vehicle to “gradually come to a stop,” forcing a rider to walk their scooter until it is outside the zone.

So, what if you want to cross the street? Do you need to carry it? Go way down the block? But, you know, beyond how this paint in the road is being treated as some sort of religious object to revere, what if the government decides to arbitrarily shut down your EV, telling you where you can and cannot drive?

The Biden administration on Friday tightened vehicle fuel mileage standards, part of its strategy to transform the American auto market into one that is dominated by electric vehicles that do not emit the pollution that is heating the planet.

But, remember, the government, which is supposed to be your servant, not your master, is totally not trying to force you into an EV.

Read: Lime Scooters To Place “No-Go Zone” Around Spokane Street Pride Paint »

CBS News Shocked That Clear Majority Want Illegals Deported

The Credentialed News wonders why people do not trust them and think they are completely biased

Pretty amazing, eh?

(Mediaite) CBS Face the Nation moderator Margaret Brennan seemed to be taken aback by a new poll showing nearly two-thirds of Americans favor the deportation of all undocumented migrants.

Speaking with Anthony Salvanto — who oversees CBS News polls — Brennan cited the finding from the network’s just-released poll which showed 62 percent of all Americans support “in principle, a new government program to deport all undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.”

Brennan noted that, according to statistics from the Department of Homeland Security, “President [JoeBiden has already deported or repatriated more people in the past year than any year since 2010.” She went on to argue that many of former President Donald Trump’s proposals about the border face major hurdles.

But, Biden has also let way more in. If you’re making way more than any year since 2010 and spending more, it makes sense, right?

“Homeland Security says that President Biden has already deported or repatriated more people in the past year than any year since 2010,” Brennan said. “And then, depending on the details of what’s talked about on the campaign trail, some of what Mr. Trump talks about could be illegal. It doesn’t seem practical, in some sense, to round up children. And then we know that the courts have questioned whether local authorities would have the ability to do it. And federal authorities don’t have the resources. So what exactly do people think they’re supporting?”

How about this: surge the National Guard to the border. Give states authority to catch and deport. Put up border barriers on land and in the rivers. End asylum claims. Make it known that anyone caught illegally in the U.S. will be immediately deported, no court, nothing. Just goodbye, like used to happen pre-1980’s amnesty. That none will get money, housing, food, medical, clothes, education. No support. This will free up federal officials to catch illegals. Require state, county, and local law enforcement to hold illegals. The U.S. has shut down all immigration many times to allow for assimilation. We do this for 20 years and the number of illegals will drop rapidly.

But, we can still allow the normal legal migration for those going through the normal method for citizenship. And, any who overstay visas. Immediate deportation.

“When you measure public sentiment on this — or really, just about any policy — you’re getting a sense of direction,” Salvanto replied. “You’re getting broad brush strokes. But those kinds of details, that’s often up to the legislatures and the courts.”

Isn’t up to We The People? Shouldn’t elected officials follow our wishes?

Read: CBS News Shocked That Clear Majority Want Illegals Deported »

Paris’ Idea To Have AC Free Olympics Runs Into A Snag

See, Paris really, really, really wants the Olympics with the lowest carbon footprint (except for the hundreds and hundreds of fossil fueled jets, all the FF vehicles), so, they cut the AC at the venues and dorms. They’re expecting about 300K to attend, not including the athletes, trainers, etc. About that

Paris wanted an AC-free Olympics. Visiting nations had other plans.

For all the steps Paris organizers have taken to put on the greenest Olympics ever, their boldest measure – the one they’ve touted again and again – pertains to the dorms in the Athletes’ Village. The rooms don’t have air-conditioning. Because of other cooling measures, organizers have assured, the athletes won’t need it.

But in a farcical turn, when the Games start next month, an Olympic Village designed to showcase sustainability will be more of an energy hog than organizers had hoped.

That’s because portable air-conditioning units will be everywhere. Wheeled in. Shipped in. Ordered by visiting countries that want their athletes to sleep well and perform at the highest level – even if it means a larger carbon footprint.

Worried about what potentially could be the world’s hottest year on record, wealthier nations have effectively undercut Paris’s marquee sustainability measure, signaling that, yes, they care about environmental aims – but not if it risks the comfort of their athletes. Some of those athletes are accustomed to temperatures cooler than what the dorms might have provided and raised concerns to their national Olympic committees.

Bleating about the need to Do Something is all fun and games right up till it’s the Warmists themselves who are forced to Do Something, eh?

“We will bring them. And we will take them back to Greece,” said Alexandra Palli, president of the Greek Olympic committee for environmental sustainability, who said her country was responding to the wishes of its athletes. “They need support. Because what they do is very difficult anyway.”

There’s always some reason why Warmists do not have to walk the talk.

And then there’s the matter what athletes are accustomed to.

“Temperature control is a big thing,” said Kat Holmes, a fencer from Washington, D.C. “I like it really cold when I sleep.”

More precisely, she likes the temperature set at 69 degrees. (snip)

“I am very pro-environment,” she said. “But the point of this is to bring together the world’s best athletes to perform the best they can.”

The perfect allegory: the world needs to do something, as long as it doesn’t inconvenience me.

Read: Paris’ Idea To Have AC Free Olympics Runs Into A Snag »

If All You See…

…is a sea that will dozens of feet by 2050, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on the real reason for the Hunter Biden trial.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove