If All You See…

…is a tall building designed to survive extreme sea rise, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on the Woke destroying museums.

Read: If All You See… »

Perpetual Lockdown: A Drop In COVID Cases Is Deceptive Or Something

At this point it is hard to distinguish between real, common sense stuff and propaganda designed to keep people in fear and willing to give their liberty up to Government

A drop in Covid-19 cases can be deceptive, official warns. Here’s how the US can stay ahead of a variant-driven surge

Although the rise of Covid-19 variants in the United States could spell trouble, pharmaceutical companies and scientists are confident vaccines will evolve with them, senior White House adviser Andy Slavitt told CNN.

“I spoke to all the pharmaceutical companies and scientists, and they all say the same thing: Even if these vaccines diminish a little bit, they will be able to continually update them,” Slavitt, who is responsible for the Covid response, told CNN’s Chris Cuomo on Thursday.

The US has witnessed a 26% decline in new cases from this time last week, continuing the trend of the steepest decline in new cases since the start of the pandemic, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

But variants, many of which appear to be more transmissible, have been spreading, with more than 1,500 cases reported in the US, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But, see, if we can double time it on vaccines we can maybe possibly fix this

Vaccination delays caused by harsh winter weather gripping much of the US means that many people will have to work “double time” to get back on track, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci.

“It’s been slowed down; in some places going to a grinding halt,” Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, said in an interview with MSNBC on Thursday.

Remember all the articles on continuing to mask and keep locked down even after you get the vaccine, even after herd immunity?

Health officials say the coronavirus will likely become endemic in the next several years. What does that mean?

Even as cases continue to decline and more Americans receive their vaccines, the coronavirus isn’t likely to go away anytime soon, health officials say.

The nation’s top infectious diseases expert Dr. Anthony Fauci dismissed the idea that COVID-19 would be eradicated in the next several years at a webinar hosted by think tank Chatham House in November.

“We need to plan that this is something we may need to maintain control over chronically. It may be something that becomes endemic, that we have to just be careful about,” he said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines endemic as the “constant presence and/or usual prevalence” of a disease within a population in a certain geographic area.

An endemic disease spreads at a baseline level every year without causing major disruption to people’s lives, said Dr. Donald Burke, professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.

Yes, but because it will be endemic, the Powers That Be can continue to make proclamations and issue edicts. Think they won’t? You haven’t been watching over the last year.

Read: Perpetual Lockdown: A Drop In COVID Cases Is Deceptive Or Something »

Facebook To “Debunk” All Things Anti-Climate Cult

First, let me get this out of the way so I’m not tempted to post yet another piece about climate cultists blaming snow and ice and cold on Other People driving fossil fueled vehicles

The Texas Power Grid Failure Is a Climate Change Cautionary Tale

Bunch of cultish lunatics. OK, moving on

Facebook will debunk myths about climate change, stepping further into ‘arbiter of truth’ role

Facebook announced Thursday it will now debunk common myths about climate change, further leaning into the “arbiter of truth” role that the company once renounced.

The social media giant said it is adding a section to its climate change information hub that will features facts with accurate information about misconceptions and falsehoods. This will include the fact that polar bear populations are declining because of global warming, as well as the fact that too much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere harms plant life.

The company said it plans to rely on experts from George Mason University, the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the University of Cambridge to identify and debunk climate change myths.

Facebook has introduced these information hubs and relied on them as a key part of its tactic to combat the widespread problem of misinformation on its services. It’s a stark turnaround from CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s statement last May, when he defended unfettered speech from politicians on the platform and said he did not think “Facebook or internet platforms in general should be arbiters of truth.”

In its announcement Thursday, Facebook said it will start adding information labels to posts about climate change that direct people to its climate change information hub.

Additionally, the company said it will now expand this hub to users in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Spain, South Africa and Taiwan. The feature has been available in the U.S., U.K., France and Germany.

Hmm, wouldn’t that make Facebook a publisher rather than just a platform, which means they are legally responsible for content of what people post. Also, what’s the “carbon footprint” of Facebook and their operations? How much “carbon” is put out by people using Facebook? What about all the ads that pop up for fossil fueled vehicle companies, fossil fueled flights and vacations, restaurants that offer Evil meat, and more? Will Facebook no longer accept ads?

We all know that the climate information hub will be one side cult propaganda. I recommend that it offer ways for climate cultists to reduce their own carbon footprint, like giving up their use of fossil fueled travel, meat, taking short showers, hand washing and line drying their clothes, and sending 20% of their net income to The Government.

What’s in this for Facebook? As they say, follow the money. How much money will they make off of pushing this scam?

Read: Facebook To “Debunk” All Things Anti-Climate Cult »

TDS: Dems Introduce Act To Stop Trump Name On Federal Projects

We’re still waiting on them to call for the removal of Robert Byrd’s name from projects, since he was a member of the KKK at one point, and they now hate monuments, including Lincoln, Washington, and Jefferson, but, in the meantime, they just can’t MoveOn from Trump

House Democrats Introduce ‘No Glory for Hate Act’ to Prevent Trump Name from Being Displayed on Federal Projects

Move OnDemocrats in the House of Representatives have introduced legislation that would prevent former President Donald Trump from having his name displayed on federal projects, buildings, statues, lands, or other type of commemoration.

According to the bill’s text, which was provided late last month, the legislation would “prohibit the use of Federal funds for the commemoration of certain former Presidents.” While Trump is not mentioned by name in the proposed legislation, he is the only president to have been impeached twice by the House.

The bill, dubbed the “No Glory for Hate Act,” was introduced by California Democrat Rep. Linda Sanchez and has 13 cosponsors, all of whom are Democrats. (snip)

The bill specifically prevents federal funds from being used to “create or display any symbol, monument, or statue commemorating any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives,” including “any highway, park, subway, Federal building, military installation, street, or other Federal property.”

The bill also prevents Trump from being buried at Arlington National Cemetery. (snip)

In addition, the bill states that twice impeached presidents are “not entitled to receive any benefit, other than Secret Service protection, under such Act.”

This is the Democrats version of unity, you know. Will Pelosi allow a vote on this? If it makes it to the Senate it will never pass the 60 vote threshold for a final vote, so it won’t make it to China Joe’s table.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1362454217152200714

How is it possible to negotiate with people who are unhinged and so hateful, so deranged? How can we work with people who have made politics so personal that it’s not enough to beat someone politically, but have to destroy them personally?

Read: TDS: Dems Introduce Act To Stop Trump Name On Federal Projects »

What’s The Most Important Number For ‘Climate Change’? The Social Cost Of Carbon

Extreme Warmists are hot to trot to push the notion of the social cost of carbon. Why?

The social cost of carbon might be the most important number on climate change

Economists are urging the U.S. government to adopt a higher number for the social cost of carbon emissions.

Why it matters: The social cost of carbon might be the single most important number on climate change, one that helps decide how much we’re willing to invest to slow global warming — and how much we actually value the future.

Driving the news: On Monday, prominent economists Nicholas Stern and Joseph Stiglitz published a paper making the case that the U.S. needs to reassess how it calculates the social cost of carbon.

  • The social cost of carbon reflects the ultimate estimated dollar price to society for every new metric ton of carbon dioxide emitted.
  • Under President Obama’s administration, the figure was estimated at $50 per metric ton by 2030, in 2007 dollars.
  • Stern and Stiglitz, reevaluating the economic models used to estimate future climate damages and putting more value on the wellbeing of future generations, suggest a social cost at the upper end of a $50–$100 per metric ton range.

See, this isn’t just about putting a price on “carbon”, but linking it to everyone’s lives.

Be smart: The social cost of carbon represents the economic benefit that will come from reducing carbon emissions, which means that setting a higher cost justifies regulations that make emitting carbon more expensive.

  • The number is also one of the best representations of what the present feels it owes future generations that will suffer the most from climate change — or benefit, if we can curb its worst effects.

Got that? It’s what you owe future generations, hence, it’s important that government puts a price on the way you live your life, which gives them control of your life and your hard earned money. Why do all the little climate cult disciples not realize that they themselves will be recipients of all the bad parts of their cult? Are they so enthused to give up their money and freedom?

Read: What’s The Most Important Number For ‘Climate Change’? The Social Cost Of Carbon »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful area that would be perfect for a solar farm, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Bunkerville, with a post on Pelosi appointing someone to whitewash the truth of the mostly peaceful Capital protests.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: People Went Out More After Mask Mandates

Um, wasn’t that rather the point of mask mandates, so that people could get out and about more? That if we were going to be in proximity with other people we should wear them?

Study: Americans Went Out More After Face Mask Mandates

New research published in Scientific Reports has found that people spent less time at home after face mask mandates were implemented, although investigators do not know whether this exposed Americans to a greater risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

Investigators used anonymized location data from smart devices to examine changes in behavior of residents 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after mask mandates were implemented in regions of the United States. They found that residents spent between 11 and 24 more minutes outside their homes after a face mask mandate was issued, even as COVID-19 rates were rising.

Individuals increased trips to a variety of places—most often restaurants and other eateries, as well as to recreational locations such as parks. The investigators said these were likely trips that they were not taking prior to the mask mandate. When people are expected to wear a mask, they perceived a lower risk associated with leaving home and visiting public locations, according to the study.

The researchers said they do not know whether this behavior increased or reduced infections. The central question asked whether masks are effective enough to offset the risks of exposure when increasing time outside of the home. The answer depends on the relative effectiveness of masks, whether they are worn properly, and other behaviors. Cases of COVID-19 increased in some states and decreased in others despite mask orders, the study noted.

I wonder if there’s a way to conduct a study to see if people were more likely to get too close to other people because they were wearing masks. Because that’s my experience, especially as time went on and we got into summer. People get too close. I’ve said again and again I practice social distancing, wash the hell out of my hands throughout the day many, many times, and do not touch. The masking made people think they were invulnerable and had them getting too close. I’ve had a few blowups with a few at work who get too close. I’d prefer not to catch COVID and be sick and not working for at least 14 days. How about you? Yes, the chance of surviving is very high, but, I’ve known people with it and they got miserable sick, and had the symptoms, like being out of breath and energy, stick around for weeks to months.

I Wore This Breathable Face Mask On an 8-Day Hiking Trip
Now, it’s quickly become my go-to for errands, workouts, and everything in between. It’s my best quarantine purchase to date.

Yes, this is a mask review, but, my question is “why in the heck did you wear a mask while out hiking in the wilderness with almost no one near you?” COVIDstupid.

This Is When You Shouldn’t Double Mask, CDC Says

Double masking was recently endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with the agency noting that it’s just one way to improve the fit and filtration of your mask. A tighter fitting mask will help prevent potentially contaminated respiratory droplets from leaking out of your mask, which could infect others and heighten the spread of COVID overall. And improving the filtration of your mask will also help protect you from breathing in contaminated droplets from others, blocking them with higher efficiency. However, double masking is not the right choice in every situation. Keep reading to find out when the CDC warns against double making, and for more guidance on what not to do, If You’re Layering These Masks, the CDC Says to Stop Immediately.

This seems more about normalizing double masking. Piss off. And take you double masking with you.

New standards will take the guesswork out of choosing the most effective face masks

Americans may soon be able to choose between two clearly labeled levels of face mask protection while browsing store shelves.

The new national mask standard outlines minimum fit, design, performance and testing requirements for face masks and would require user instructions, package labeling and a permanent tag on the product.

First, this seems like something that the Powers That Be are going to continue pushing, and second, they want to force us to wear only Approved masks. After telling us “just wear something. Anything. Protect yourself”.

Why do you have to wear a mask after getting vaccinated? Will vaccines need to be given every year?

Because the Powers That Be want to keep the pain going, in order to keep people used to being controlled by Government. Fortunately, 20 states are refusing to cooperate with this stuff.

Read: Surprise: People Went Out More After Mask Mandates »

What’s Happening In Texas Is A Global Warning Or Something

The hit parade on blaming what’s happening in Texas to and/or blaming it on the climate crisis (scam) just do not stop. Because doomsday cult members have to keep pushing their doomsday cult, no matter how little it makes sense in a rational world

Texas’s cold-weather catastrophe is a global warning

Many parts of the planet saw unusually cold weather this week. In some places, it looked pretty fun: There was ice skating on Amsterdam canals and cross-country skiing on Moscow sidewalks. Even in the Middle East, students at the University of Damascus in Syria got a break as their exams were canceled due to snow.

But when cold weather hit Texas, America’s famously independent southern state, the early novelty of snow and ice quickly evaporated. With temperatures in the low teens for days, the state, despite its dominant energy sector, saw rolling power outages turn into a prolonged blackout that left more than 4 million people in the dark and cold. (snip)

Broadcast around the world, the scenes in Texas are another blow to America’s global image, already smeared by the pandemic and the Jan. 6 insurrection. But there may be lessons for everyone in what is happening to the Lone Star state — and a warning for anyone not prepared for a changing climate.

Texas doesn’t use these models, for an obvious reason: It generally doesn’t get that cold. What happened this week is really unusual. On Monday, the temperature in Dallas was a high of 14 degrees, about 50 degrees lower than normal for February. Experts have attributed this weather to a mass of cold air from the Arctic.

We tend to think of climate change in terms of warmer weather, rather than the winter storms seen this week. But the science is more complex than that: As Tom Niziol wrote for the Capital Weather Gang, some research suggests that melting sea ice in the Arctic could be responsible for the disrupted weather patterns in the Northern Hemisphere.

Scientists expect more cold weather to come. “We used to not worry too much about such extreme cold weather in places like Texas, but we probably need to get ready for more in the future,” Le Xie, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Texas A&M University, told the Texas Tribune. “We’re going to have more extreme weather conditions throughout the country.”

It’s a cult. Warm weather, hot weather, cold weather, snow, ice, you name it, it’s all because you and your family members going back to the 1850s drove fossil fueled vehicles and ate meat. Thanks, dudes and dudettes!

How many more days do we have to suffer through this cult propaganda? Again, I didn’t go looking for this, it was the first article showing in the news section when I searched climate change on Google.

Read: What’s Happening In Texas Is A Global Warning Or Something »

China Joe Announces Amnesty Plans As Americans Still Suffer Economically From COVID

I’m sure it will be totally bipartisan, right? Joe might pick off a few Republicans like Lindsay Graham, but, Americans are still suffering with being out of a job, having their business closed, working shorter hours, not able to do their full jobs because of lockdown, and so forth. So, perfect timing to trot out an amnesty plan, right? Als0, BTW, notice that with a Democrat in the White House the headlines tend to be “White House announces” rather than “Trump says” or something similar

White House announces sweeping immigration bill

Americans before illegalsThe White House announced a sweeping immigration bill Thursday that would create an eight-year path to citizenship for millions of immigrants already in the country and provide a faster track for undocumented immigrants brought to the US as children.

The legislation faces an uphill climb in a narrowly divided Congress, where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has just a five-vote margin and Senate Democrats do not have the 60 Democratic votes needed to pass the measure with just their party’s support.

Administration officials argued Wednesday evening that the legislation was an attempt by President Joe Biden to restart a conversation on overhauling the US immigration system and said he remained open to negotiating.

“He was in the Senate for 36 years, and he is the first to tell you the legislative process can look different on the other end than where it starts,” one administration official said in a call with reporters, adding that Biden would be “willing to work with Congress.”

Do we really need this conversation at this point? With COVID and the fallout from it and lockdowns still raging? Perhaps if Joe wasn’t going super soft on the border and on deporting illegal aliens, including criminal ones. What conversation does Joe want? He did little during his 36 years in Congress other than push for amnesty, same when his was Vice President.

Interestingly, there are really no quotes from China Joe. The White House is announcing “major legislation” and not one word from him? Strange

Here’s what the bill, titled the US Citizenship Act of 2021, includes:

The legislation goes further than the last effort in 2013 by cutting the time to acquire citizenship to eight years instead of 13, according to an administration official.

First, individuals would be in a temporary status for five years, with three years until they get citizenship, amounting to an eight-year path.

There’s an exception for undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children, who fall under a form of humanitarian relief known as Temporary Protected Status or who are farmworkers. Those individuals can go directly to green cards if they meet requirements, including passing background checks.

To be eligible for the bill’s legalization plan, immigrants must have been in the country before January 1, 2021.

They supposedly need to pass criminal and national security background checks and pay their taxes, then be able to demonstrate knowledge of English and US civics (which probably means being able to ask “do you have anyone who speaks Spanish” in English and knowing which party they’re supposed to vote for) to apply for citizenship. How’d that criminal thing work out with Obama’s DACA, where lots and lots were serious law breakers?

From the “fact sheet” linked above, which is not a plan, “the bill further recognizes America as a nation of immigrants by changing the word “alien” to “noncitizen” in our immigration laws.” Hell no. They’re aliens. Foreigners. Not “noncitizens”. It would also clear backlogs and massively increase the number of legal immigrants, along with forgiving illegals who were previously deported. And, from the fact sheet

Keep families together. The bill reforms the family-based immigration system by clearing backlogs, recapturing unused visas, eliminating lengthy wait times, and increasing per-country visa caps. It also eliminates the so-called “3 and 10-year bars,” and other provisions that keep families apart. The bill further supports familes by more explicitly including permanent partnerships and eliminating discrimination facing LGBTQ+ families. It also provides protections for orphans, widows, children, and Filipino veterans who fought alongside the United States in World War II. Lastly, the bill allows immigrants with approved family-sponsorship petitions to join family in the United States on a temporary basis while they wait for green cards to become available.

Bringing in tons of foreigners with few job skills, eh? This is what I wrote back in September 2017 regarding DACA kids

Here’s a recommendation: Congress puts DACA into law, but allows 4 year renewals, rather than 2 years, in order to decrease burden on federal agencies. Just like with people who are applying for citizenship, any serious crimes can be cause to cancel an illegals legal status and deport them. And, yes, even DUIs may be considered cause, just like with those applying for citizenship. After 12 years, they can go through the same process as those applying for citizenship in order to attempt to earn full citizenship.

BUT, if we aren’t going to lay the “sins” of the parent(s) on the children, we are going to lay them on the parent(s). In order to obtain DACA status, the parent(s) must self deport, and provide proof at an immigration checkpoint as they leave. They are not allowed back in the United States for 2 years, and then only for a short visit. If they are caught residing in the U.S., or attempting to enter the country illegally, the children will have their DACA status ended and will be deported. After 12 years, they would be allowed to apply for temporary resident status, conditioned on speaking English and having good moral character. This seems fair. The parents broke our laws.

If you don’t agree with punishing the parents, then you’re simply using DACA to create a backdoor amnesty for all.

Someone has to pay for that sin. Why would we reward the parents?

The fact sheet also yammers about growing our economy. How about getting Americans back to work first before hooking up illegals and people who over-stayed their visas?

Read: China Joe Announces Amnesty Plans As Americans Still Suffer Economically From COVID »

Extreme Winter Storms Aren’t Inconsistent With Climate Crisis (scam) Or Something

This is not a retread article. This is a new one. I’m not even looking for this stuff purposefully. It’s showing up on Yahoo’s front page and when I search “climate change” on Google. The ones this morning were front and center without even clicking the news link. This was prominent on the Yahoo front page. Because it is a cult, and cults have to sync their messages and then get them out

Extreme winter storms aren’t inconsistent with global warming and will continue for decades, expert says

The massive winter storm that buried much of the United States in snow this week bringing record-setting cold across the plains and knocking out the power grid in Texas is not inconsistent with climate change, a leading expert told Yahoo News.

“We haven’t had enough warming to eliminate cold events, and we shouldn’t expect to have enough warming to eliminate cold events in the mid-latitudes for some time,” Noah Diffenbaugh, a climate scientist at Stanford University, said in phone interview on Tuesday.

Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, global temperatures have risen by just over one degree Celsius, enough to significantly alter weather events, but certainly not enough to put an end to winter storms. (snip)

“Our climate change present is that we are already in a climate that has changed significantly and that the change of one degree Celsius has already been enough to increase the frequency and severity of many different kinds of many different kinds of extreme events,” Diffenbaugh said. “We see this very clearly in extreme hot events, where our research has shown that the probability of record setting hot events has already increased by more than 80 percent of the global surface area. For extreme wet events and extreme dry events, in terms of high and low precipitation, that number is about 50 percent — we’ve already seen increases in probability in about half of the globe so far.”

OK, that’s a new Hotcold take. See, the slight 1.5F increase in global temperatures since 1850, caused by you and your predecessors, is not only not killing off winter storms, but, is making them more extreme. But, in the future, your carbon footprint will kill them off in a couple decades (and, when it doesn’t happen, the cult will say that’s further Proof of the climate crisis).

Then the doomsday climate cult propaganda piece delves into wildfires and hot weather and sea rise before, deep in the article

What is unclear, however, is whether climate change is making winter storms like this week’s blizzard more severe. That’s because climate systems are highly complex and based on myriad factors.

So the whole leadup is a bunch of mule fritters? There’s an old saying with Internet pieces: most people read the first three paragraphs or 30 seconds. How many never made it to the “unclear” part? How many simply read the headline?

Read: Extreme Winter Storms Aren’t Inconsistent With Climate Crisis (scam) Or Something »

Pirate's Cove