…is fire, which is just like out in the woods due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on more Israel hating from Ilhan Omar.
It’s cooking week!
Read: If All You See… »
…is fire, which is just like out in the woods due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Jihad Watch, with a post on more Israel hating from Ilhan Omar.
It’s cooking week!
Read: If All You See… »
Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day in America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, Thanksgiving is almost here. This pinup is by Peter Dribben, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me.
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
Let’s face it, it really is over unless Team Trump can provide rock-solid proof that cheating occurred in multiple states that would provide enough votes for Trump to win. Just getting Georgia and /or Pennsylvania wouldn’t make a difference. They will have to show election “irregularities” in Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, perhaps Virginia (which was trending Trump heavily while still being called for Biden for some reason), and even in swing states that Trump won. It has to be convincing, and it needs to be soon, because even many Trump supporters are moving on
Sidney Powell: ‘Biblical’ Lawsuit Coming, Accuses Ga. Gov. Kemp of Deal With Dominion
Levying explosive claims of widespread voter fraud specifically tied to Dominion Voting Systems and potentially a pay-for-play scheme with GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell on Newsmax TV vowed to deliver a “biblical” voter fraud case this week.
“We’ve got tons of evidence; it’s so much, it’s hard to pull it all together,” Powell told Saturday night’s “The Count” co-hosted by Rob Schmitt and Mark Halperin, teasing the explosive allegation of the Georgia governor in a contested and key battleground state.
“Hopefully this week we will get it ready to file, and it will be biblical.”
“It’s a massive project to pull this fraud claim together with the evidence that I want to put in,” she added.
There’s no doubt it is quite a bit of information, and digging deep into it will be some serious work. But, it has to be quick, and it has to be convincing
They’re going to have to prove this. And they’re going to have to prove that it actually happened, and happened in multiple states. And they’re going to have to show that it happened quickly. If they can prove these claims for at least one state by the end of Tuesday, this could be huge. Publishing Wednesday-Saturday would just be missed, with Thanksgiving and such. Otherwise, next Monday. It must be 100% conclusive, not just allegations. Something that the media will not be able to dispute.
And this doesn’t even get into the other “irregularities” that Rudy Giulliani is looking into. Most of us know that there was cheating that could very well have changed the outcome, things we are not seeing in the deep Democrat states or super deep Republican states. Suspicion, correlations, and even Dems admitting they cheated are not the proof, though. Team Trump really has to provide that evidence by December 5th or so.
Read: Last Gasp? Sidney Powell Promises “Biblical Lawsuit” »
Yes, we pretty much knew that China Joe Biden would rejoin the “historic” Paris Climate agreement, an agreement set up to attempt to make the U.S. compliant while avoiding the duly elected and empowered Senate per the Constitution, trying to placate the Warmists who won’t practice what they preach
Biden will rejoin the Paris Climate Accord. Here’s what happens next
President-elect Joe Biden will reenter the U.S. into the Paris Climate Agreement, the global pact forged five years ago among nearly 200 nations to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
The move will come after President Donald Trump formally withdrew the country from the climate change agreement on Nov. 4, which was the earliest possible date under its terms. Biden said he will bring the U.S. back into the accord as early as February.
Here’s a look at what rejoining means for the U.S. and the world and what could happen next.
In fact, nothing will happen except lots of plans and yammer, just like almost every 1st and 2nd world nation, who are not in compliance.
While the official U.S. exit from the accord further isolated Washington from the rest of the world, it won’t necessarily have an immediate impact on international efforts to mitigate climate change and implement the framework of the agreement.
However, nearly every country in the world is part of the agreement. Of the 195 countries that signed the agreement, 189 countries officially adopted the accord, and no other country besides the U.S. has abandoned it.
“Since the U.S. has one of the biggest economies in the world and has contributed the most to climate change, it is incredibly important that the U.S. return to the Paris agreement,†said Cornell University climate scientist Natalie Mahowald, a lead author of the 2018 U.N. report on climate change.
Trump getting us out of Obama’s bad deal was putting America first. Biden will put America last
The U.S. is the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases behind China and is seen as key in the global effort to reduce the effects of climate change.
“U.S. leadership and the U.S.-China bilateral agreement to cut CO2 emissions were key to getting the Paris agreement on track,†said Mahowald. “Continued U.S. involvement and leadership is key to any effort to stop climate change.â€
The America haters and China lovers will continue their China love, even as China makes pledges that they have no intention of keeping.
More broadly, the U.S. will have to rebuild trust with other nations in the agreement, especially after Trump’s legacy of climate change denial and his official withdrawal from the accord.
Why is it always that the U.S. will have to “rebuild trust”? Why do other countries, a good chunk of whom the U.S. has saved and/or protected for 100 years, think they can dictate our policies? Perhaps they should just say “thank you”, rather than expecting the U.S. to change while those countries don’t.
I’m looking forward to China Joe giving up his own use of fossil fuels.
Read: China Joe To Rejoin Paris Climate Agreement Which No One Is Really Following Or Something »
…is the logo of what could be an evil fossil fueled vehicle company, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on the 2020 election dragging on and on and on.
Doubleshot below the fold, so, check out Maggie’s Farm, with a post wondering whether there is any meaningful racism in the U.S.
Read: If All You See… »
How is it that places that vote overwhelmingly Democrat see such high infection rates? Aren’t these the people who screech “wear a mask”?
California capped a week of unprecedented coronavirus spread, with officials unsure how much worse it will get while placing hope that new restrictions could help slow infections as the holidays approach.
The staggering rise in cases caught many off guard, with long lines at some testing facilities and worries about whether Thanksgiving will cause even more people to be infected.
For the seven-day period that ended Friday, an average of 10,981 people in California were reported to be infected daily — a number that has more than doubled in just the last two weeks. That is even worse than the peak in the summer, which until now had been California’s worst spike of COVID-19, according to a Times data analysis.
Aren’t they good little citizens who Do What They Are Told?
N.J. reports 3,635 new COVID-19 cases, 23 deaths as hospitals continue to see surge in patients
New Jersey on Friday reported 3,635 more coronavirus cases and 23 additional deaths, while hospitalizations rose for the 21st straight day as the second wave of the pandemic continues.
Strange, right? Aren’t Democrats good little sheep? Oh, you libs are saying “this is happening in mostly Republican areas of the states”?
Let me get this straight: San Fran County went 85% for Biden, yet, they haven't been following the Rules leading to big spikes in COVID? Huh https://t.co/sPnvepj4Au
— William Teach2 ??????? #refuseresist (@WTeach2) November 20, 2020
Read: California, NJ Hit Epic Highs Of Coronavirus Infections »
Of course, there’s one little problem with these five year plans (Progressives (nice Fascists)/Modern Socialists really love their 5 year plans)
Canada sets out to enshrine 2050 net zero emissions goal in law
Justin Trudeau presented a bill to the Canadian parliament to set five-yearly carbon targets from 2030 to 2050, but was criticised for a lack of immediate actionPrime Minister Justin Trudeau has presented a bill to commit Canada to cut its emissions to net zero by 2050 and set five-year targets to meet the goal.
The bill, called the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act, follows an election pledged by Trudeau to set the country on a path to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
The act, which was introduced to parliament on Thursday, establishes a legally binding process to set five-year emission reduction targets from 2030 and develop a credible plan to meet each commitment. If passed, future governments would have to report regularly on progress towards meeting the goals.
However, the bill does not set out how the government is planning to reduce emissions in the short term nor does it propose a new 2030 target.
Whoops. But, then, this is what most are doing, playing this “we’re going to have something going in 2030” game. Why? Because politicians need re-election, and crashing the economies and slapping massive restrictions on citizen’s lives while burdening them with a big cost of living increase won’t help them. They have to ease citizens into giving up their money and freedom.
Canada has failed to live up to its climate commitments in recent decades. It reneged on the Kyoto Protocol and prior to the pandemic was off track to meet its 2020 emissions target.
That’s pretty much every signatory of Kyoto and Paris
“What we see is that there is no plan at all. There is no plan for getting us to net zero. And it’s really just a game of smoke and mirrors,†Green Party leader Annamie Paul told reporters.
“There is only talk about accountability of a plan that will be developed at some future date,†she said, adding that it could take up to a year and a half under the bill for Canada to adopt a new 2030 target.
Did any reporter ask Annamie Paul, members of the Green Party, and members of the other parties pushing this stuff if they’ve given up their own use of fossil fuels and made their lives Net Zero?
Isabelle Turcotte, federal policy director at the Pembina Institute, said the legislation “will help Canada achieve its low-carbon energy potentialâ€.
The bill, she said, “moves us past the vagaries of the election cycle with legal requirements on governments to achieve climate progress, a strong accountability framework provides much-needed regulatory certainty for businesses to confidently make investments needed today to create jobsâ€.
That makes it sound as if voters will never be able to change the policy if the disagree with it. That’s rather disturbing.
Read: Canada’s Prime Minister Submits Legislation Pushing Towards 2050 Net Zero »
Joan Walsh, hyper-lefty extraordinaire, takes a stab at rationalizing the horrible losses Democrats suffered in the states
How to Understand Democrats’ Disappointing Losses in State Legislatures
Joe Biden won the White House, overwhelmingly, but otherwise, since Election Day, the news for Democrats has been bleak. They failed to flip the Senate—though the Georgia runoffs could still give them a 50-50 tie, broken by Vice President Kamala Harris—and lost seats in the House of Representatives, where they had been projected to pad their majority. But nowhere was the news worse than at the state legislative level, where despite unprecedented investment by Democratic organizations and outside groups, and expectations that they’d flip from four to eight legislative bodies—or more, in a “blue wave†election—the party lost ground.
With surprising candor, Nicole Hobbs, cofounder of Every District, a state legislative organizing, fundraising, and data analysis group, wrote in an election post-mortem: “It was a bloodbath.â€
I heard that word a lot. Also “shit show.†Most mild: “No way to sugarcoat it.â€
The losses were everywhere. Not all races in all states are called, but there’s no way, even with the outstanding contests, that Democrats will flip chambers. Against all expectations, they lost the New Hampshire House and Senate. Activists hoped Democrats might pick up the Iowa and Minnesota houses; they lost five and seven seats, respectively. They seemed close to flipping both the Arizona House and Senate; despite Biden’s win, they gained only one Senate seat there. They thought they had a decent shot of flipping the North Carolina House and/or Senate; they lost an estimated four seats in the House while gaining one in the Senate. After winning 12 seats in the Texas House in 2018, there was optimism Democrats could flip it by winning nine this year; they won one.
They were given good odds of winning the Michigan House, which seems reasonable in hindsight, since Biden won the state by almost 150,000 votes; instead, zero gains. Biden also won Wisconsin, though more narrowly, but thanks to hugely gerrymandered districts, Democrats lost two seats in the state Senate, while winning two in the House. And he won Pennsylvania, but Democrats lost three seats in the House and apparently one in the Senate.
So, pretty much bad for Dems, right? What happened?
The number-one explanation: Donald Trump had long coattails, even in defeat—and Biden had short ones, even in victory. “That’s what people just didn’t see coming,†says Carolyn Fiddler of Daily Kos, long an evangelist for Democrats to pay more attention to statehouse races. “Trump wasn’t on the ballot in 2018. We don’t know what would have happened if he was.†Everyone I interviewed agreed. And the suburban “blue wave†that helped lift Biden to victory? It did not carry Democratic state candidates (or, to be honest, a lot of US House or Senate seats). “Republicans heavily voted down-ballot, where Democrats did not again,†says Joanna Cattanach, who ran and narrowly lost a second time for a Texas state senate seat in Dallas County. “And we saw a slew of ticket splitters.†I heard that all across the country. It will take a lot more district-level analysis to be sure.
So, wait, Trump had long coattails, which provided destruction in the states (and, let’s not forget all the taken House seats), yet, somehow, he lost those same states? Might it have something to do with the huge deviation in president only ballots, a giant jump that looks like, dare I say, fraud?
As with the disappointing House and Senate outcomes, some Democrats complain that the Biden campaign focused too much on Trump and not enough on the devolution of the entire Republican Party into a racist, antidemocratic swamp. As Ron Brownstein put it in a must-read Atlantic piece, “Rather than presenting Trump as the culmination of Republican policies and values, Biden consistently portrayed him as an aberration; many strategists on both sides believe that made it easier for voters to oppose Trump but still back Republicans in House and Senate races.â€
Maybe people wanted Trumpism without Trump. Would it be wrong to say that Democrats focused too much on defeating Trump, legally and illegally, and forgot so much down ballot? Anyhow, Joan continues providing excuses and Excuses. One thing to remember, Obama, despite a big win and easy win in his 2nd election, lost a lot of House, Senate, and state positions. Of course, he was a master campaigner, was likeable, didn’t seem mentally confused, and didn’t win by as much a margin as Biden, which seems weird, right?
Read: Joan Walsh: Yes, Democrats Did Get Blown Out In The States »
Big cities tend to lean heavily Left, which means they are chock full of climate cultists, always yammering for Someone Else to be burdened with taxes, fees, and restrictions. Yet, so few of these cultists want anything done to their own lives. Perhaps it’s time for them to be forced to practice what they preach, because we need experimental groups, right?
Cities must actively shape development to combat climate change
We are in a critical decade, with a last shot to avoid the worst consequences of crises such as climate change and biodiversity loss. A recent report from the United Nations concluded that the world has failed to meet a single target on stopping biodiversity loss since targets were agreed upon in 2010. Forty percent of the world’s plants are under threat of extinction, and humanity has wiped out over 60 percent of the population of vertebrate species since 1970. When it comes to climate change, we are crossing tipping points at an alarming rate. Wildfires and storms are ravaging large parts of the world as Greenland’s melting ice sheet has passed the “point of no return” and may be destined to disappear. Forty percent of the Amazon rainforest is on the brink of shifting from rainforest to savanna.
We’ve been told that Doom is coming for 30 years. So far? Nothing
The COVID pandemic is testing us in unprecedented ways, giving us a more tangible understanding of the importance of resilience, and of the scale of challenges we need to address as a society. We no longer can ignore our collective responsibility to change things. The time to act is now — for all of us.
Fortunately, many of us are in a position to have real impact just because of where we live. Do you live in a city? So does 55 percent of the world’s population — and urbanization continues to increase worldwide. This is significant, because cities are the main driver of many impacts described above. In our linear economy, cities act as global resource drains — devouring materials and energy from the hinterlands and spewing out waste and emissions. Although cities only occupy 3 percent of the earth’s land surface, they consume 75 percent of global resources and are responsible for 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.
Cities are what we call a “leverage point” — a place in the system where positive change can have a disproportionately beneficial impact. If we redesign our cities to be circular, regenerative and equitable, not only can we eliminate most of the impact humanity is causing globally — we also can create a future to look forward to.
This Green Utopia yammering continues on for a while, but, yes, these leftist cities should be forced to change. Let’s see how they like having their fossil fueled travel taken away. The loss of revenue from doing away with airports and visitor centers and visitors. Running museums and such with solar panels. Have fun walking up 20 flights or more of stairs because elevators are unreliable. And heat and AC will barely be usable. Working on your laptop by candlelight. Skyrocketing prices and taxes.
And these people who vote for this will not be allowed to leave for areas that are not doing this. They seemed to like losing their freedom during COVID lockdowns, so, they can just deal with lockdowns for the climate crisis (scam).
Cities are no longer one-way sinks for resources. All valuable resources that enter the city — from building materials to food to products — are collected and reused or remanufactured into new, high-value goods within the city’s borders. Cities are producers instead of just consumers, with new green industries flourishing and serving as the basis for resilient, regional economies.
Well, good luck growing your own food, making clothes, etc, in these big big cities.
Hundreds of cities around the world already have made the pledge to become circular, carbon neutral and resilient. But city governments can’t achieve this alone — they need the involvement and participation of citizens to make it a reality. We all need to become “city makers” and do our part to evolve our cities toward visions such as these.
It’s real easy to make pledges, right? Keeping ones like this? Not so easy. Why do all these Warmists not want to do this stuff in their own backyards?
Read: Cities Full Of Warmists Who Are Hypocrites Must Lead The Way Or Something »
…is the notion of eating meat which is bad for ‘climate change’ and should be restricted for Other People, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is 357 Magnum, with a post on instant karma for a guy stealing a Trump flag.
Read: If All You See… »