cBS Notes Americans Are Paying More For Health Insurance

I’m sure this was meant to be a way of the moonbats at cBS giving a valid reason for Luigi Mangione murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, but, it has gone so very, very wrong

From the link

Health insurance costs are far outpacing inflation, leaving more consumers on the hook each year for thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expenses. At the same time, some insurers are rejecting nearly 1 in 5 claims. That double whammy is leaving Americans paying more for coverage yet sometimes feeling like they’re getting less in return, experts say.

Frustration over denials and medical costs has fueled an outpouring of vitriol against health insurance companies in the wake of the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Also last week, a similar outcry led Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield to reverse a decision to limit anesthesia coverage during surgeries.

The anger may be rooted in fears that unexpected medical costs could prove financially ruinous, as well as concerns that essential care could be denied by an insurer, putting health and well-being at risk even for those who have health insurance.

See? He had Reasons.

In 2024, the average health insurance premium for families carried a price tag of $25,572 per year, while single workers paid an average of $8,951, representing a 6% and 7% increase from the year earlier, KFF data shows. Since 2000, the rise in health insurance premiums has outpaced inflation for all but a handful of years, the health policy research firm found.

Well, let’s see: “In 2012, the average annual premium for family health insurance was $15,745. This was a 4% increase from the previous year. On average, workers paid $4,316 toward the cost of their coverage. Say, what happened in 2012?

Read: cBS Notes Americans Are Paying More For Health Insurance »

Warmists Are Very Upset People Have Free Speech On Social Media

See, everything that does not conform to doomsday cult doctrine is “misinformation”

Social Media Is a Growing Vehicle for Climate Misinformation

Green Climate Thought PoliceA few weeks ago, delegates from nearly 200 nations met for the 29th United Nations climate summit (COP29) in Azerbaijan, where they discussed how best to reduce emissions to slow dangerous global warming. Meanwhile, a separate global forum was playing out online, dedicated to undermining the conference, promoting oil and gas and denying humans’ role in climate change.

new report, published on Friday by international nonprofit Global Witness, found that climate misinformation and disinformation spread unchecked on TikTok during COP29, mostly in user comments on videos. The users they identified denied man-made global warming and rebuked efforts to combat it, claiming that climate change is a “lie” or “hoax.”

Again, would those be the 40,000+ who took fossil fueled trips? You know they did not bike or walk there, and taking the train would be extremely arduous. If the current warm period is mostly/solely caused by mankind then why did all these people take fossil fueled trips? Anyway, how dare you peasants have the ability to speak your mind!

In recent years, social media platforms like X, Facebook and even LinkedIn have emerged as efficient vehicles to spread this type of inaccurate rhetoric as quickly as climate-fueled wildfires. Online influencers and prominent political figures, particularly President-elect Donald Trump, have fanned these flames on social media, a worrisome trend as trust in science and journalists continues in some communities to plummet, experts say.

It couldn’t be, bare with me here, that cult scientists have shown themselves to be in the tank for the cult, that their “findings” are more like Madam Zelda reading your palm, and that most of their prognostications fail, right? That pretty much everything they predict is utter doom, and it helps get them more government money, meaning this is government propaganda, right?

This tracks with my colleague Bob Berwyn’s recent reporting from the conference, during which U.N. officials launched an initiative to combat climate misinformation at an international scale. Berwyn pointed out that after Elon Musk bought Twitter (now X) in 2022, the tech mogul reinstated accounts that had been banned for spreading disinformation about climate and other topics. Since then, the number of accounts amplifying climate denial have proliferated, with high-profile users reaching millions of people per post.

Government that won’t let you have your say and tries to shut those guilty of Wrongthink down are what kinds of governments? If the climate cult’s “science” is so weak that they cannot rebut people with scientific facts than maybe this is a cult, not a science.

Read: Warmists Are Very Upset People Have Free Speech On Social Media »

If All You See…

…is an area flooding from too much carbon pollution bad weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Green Jihad, with a post on St. Greta continuing to dive down the Jew hating hole.

Read: If All You See… »

Democrats Ask Biden To Protect Fake Asylum Seekers

What is Biden really going to be able to do in a little over a month? And, anything Biden does can be undone by Trump

Democrats Urge President Biden to Protect Legally Present Migrants

Democrats are rallying nationwide to oppose President-elect Donald Trump’s controversial immigration policies, launching a wave of grassroots mobilization, legal challenges and legislative efforts aimed at protecting immigrant communities.

On Tuesday morning, a letter signed by seven leading Democratic Party senators seen by Newsweek was sent to President Joe Biden, urging him to act now to protect current legal migrants.

Trump has pledged to carry out the largest deportation program in U.S. history, shut down the CBP One app, end the catch-and-release policy and reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” program as part of his hardline immigration agenda. He has also vowed to go after those admitted into the United States under programs established to protect migrants from certain countries.

So, what do they recommend?

Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto told Newsweek that she had spoken to the White House about her proposals for President Joe Biden to extend protections to citizens who are in the country through TPS.

“There are horrific conditions in these countries that satisfy the provisions of TPS and this is an opportunity now for this administration to extend that status or provide that status based on those horrific conditions in those countries, because I know the next administration, their immigration policy is chaotic and President Trump has basically said he’s going to engage in master deportation and nobody’s going to be safe,” Masto said.

Currently, 16 countries are included on the list, including Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, along with Afghanistan, Burma, El Salvador, Syria, Ukraine and Yemen. The Biden administration did allow TPS to lapse for Venezuelans after two years in October, however.

That’s their plan? They do realize that courts have already ruled that TPS can be cancelled, right? If Biden does this the Trump admin should simply ship all the TPS folks to the neighborhoods of Biden and the senators.

In a withering critique, Padilla issued a stark warning that mass deportations will “rip” residents from their communities and lead to a “less prosperous” America, which would leave Americans paying “higher prices for everyday goods and services.”

“Trump’s threat to deport millions of people from the U.S. will rip longtime residents like DACA recipients, TPS holders, and immigrant essential workers away from their communities, leaving the American people to pay higher prices for everyday goods and services. Mass deportations will lead to a less prosperous America for all,” Padilla told Newsweek.

These are not their communities. Their communities are in different countries. TPS means they are here temporarily, not permanently. But, apparently, the 6 senators are upset that the people who clean their homes and cut their grass could be sent back home. And these same senators have protection from the crime and conditions the fake asylum seekers create.

Read: Democrats Ask Biden To Protect Fake Asylum Seekers »

NOAA Says Sea Rise Doom For Coast Coming By 2050 Or Something

Who gets fired when this doesn’t happen? Oh, right, they don’t expect anyone to remember their prognostication of doom, this is all meant to be scaremongering now

From the link

A map shows the growing threat to coastal cities across the United States due to rising sea levels.

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s latest projections, sea levels along the U.S. coastlines are projected to rise, on average, around 10 to 12 inches by 2050.

Many communities along the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific coasts face significant risks of partial inundation in the future if current trends continue and mitigation efforts are not intensified.

NOAA’s Sea Level Rise Viewer shows which cities may be impacted along each coast, with dark blue areas indicating significant projected sea level rises.

You can play with that sea level rise viewer if you want, but, consider the 10-12 inches of sea rise thing: sea rise during the 20th Century was exactly average, meaning 6-8 inches, when it should have been much higher for a Holocene warm period. And it has not accelerated for the 21st Century. Look at, say, Atlantic City, NJ: NOAA’s own actual data, not computer models, shows 1.38 feet per 100 years, which is what is expected during a Holocene warm period, and this is a gauge that goes back to 1911. There’s also land subsiding going on.

While it is highly unlikely that cities will go underwater in the near future, according to a NOAA oceanographer specialist, any rise that is two feet or more above the average high tide has the potential to be extremely disruptive and/or outright damaging.

Dr. William Sweet, an NOAA oceanographer spearheading efforts to track and predict changes in sea level and coastal flood risk, told Newsweek that while he did not believe any communities in the U.S. would be going underwater by 2050, though “episodic flooding could become extremely damaging and a major concern unless we do something.”

And there it is, the bet hedging. Anyhow, sea rise should be expected during a warm period, especially during an inter-glacial period, no need to bring in witchcraft, er, human caused reasons.

Read: NOAA Says Sea Rise Doom For Coast Coming By 2050 Or Something »

Austria Already Looking To Deport Syrian Refugees

Well, that was quick

Austria prepares to deport Syrian migrants after Assad regime falls
Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, the U.K. said they will halt Syrian asylum applications one day after rebel forces ousted the country’s dictator.

Austria has announced plans to deport Syrian migrants following the fall of the country’s dictator Bashar Assad to rebel forces after 13 years of civil war, while Belgium, France, Greece and Germany are pausing Syrian asylum applications.

“I have instructed the ministry to prepare an orderly return and deportation program to Syria,” Interior Minister Gerhard Karner told Austrian media, without clarifying which migration statuses would be targeted. Some 100,000 Syrians live in Austria, according to the country’s statistics agency.

One day after Syrian rebel factions, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) — designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and the United Kingdom — took Damascus, Austria, Belgium, Italy, Germany, Greece and the Netherlands are using the success of the rebels to revise their migration policies, with all six closing their doors to asylum seekers. The U.K. has also said it will stop processing asylum applications from Syrians.

The decisions to revise the asylum policies come as anti-immigrant far-right parties have surged in popularity across the European Union in recent months. Germany, for example, faces snap elections in February, with far-right parties currently performing strongly in the polls.

Obviously, Politico couldn’t leave that bit of moonbattery out. Maybe citizens in 1st World Countries are simply tired of being overrun with foreigners who do not share their values, their mores, their beliefs, their culture, and so much more, and refuse to assimilate to the host countries, all while being told that

  • Citizens of the host country must assimilate to the foreigners
  • Money and housing will go to the foreigners
  • Citizens just need to suck it up when it comes to things like crime, assault, sexual assault, and so much more from the foreigners
  • If citizens say or do anything Mean in person or on the Internet the citizens could go to jail

Seriously, it’s not like many of these Syrians are Islamic extremists, right, and, that most tend to be fighting age men, right?

(Washington Post) Some have been eager to return — as they felt the pull of family, faced the difficulty of building new lives in resistant host countries or found themselves in places even more unstable. As Lebanon emerged as the latest battleground in the Middle East, thousands of Syrians had begun streaming back across the border.

But for refugees who have spent more than a decade in the liberal democracies of Europe, returning to a Syria under an Islamist government, even one that has publicly pledged tolerance, could be a jarring change, particularly for children.

The problem here is that the Syrians are mostly keeping their own culture. They have not given up their Syrian ways.

If Biden-Harris want to attempt to bring Syrians they’d have to do it quickly, obviously. Be thankful Harris did not win, I could easily see her taking tens of thousands if not more Syrians in, all unvetted. Trump won’t. Trump will most likely look to send the ones here back.

Read: Austria Already Looking To Deport Syrian Refugees »

Pink Is The Color Of Climate Doom Photography Or Something

But, we’re all going to die

‘This is all pink and attractive, but we are going to die’: Anastasia Samoylova on photographing Florida’s climate anxiety

Russian-born American photographer Anastasia Samoylova loves “Barbie.” Not only did she wear a hot pink suit to the opening of her own photography exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in October, she also insisted on taking her teenage son to see Greta Gerwig’s 2023 film — considering it essential feminist viewing. “Is it perfect? No. But it addresses very complicated and divisive subjects,” Samoylova told CNN in a video call from her home in Florida. She recalls how Margot Robbie’s title character, Barbie, stops the euphoric dance floor in its tracks when she wonders aloud, “do you guys ever think about dying?” “That’s literally what I’ve been trying to communicate,” said Samoylova. “This is all pink and attractive, but we are going to die.”

Samoylova, whose work is currently on display at both the Met Museum in New York and the Saatchi Gallery in London, has garnered critical acclaim for her subtle, anxiety-inducing images of Florida’s collapsing pastel-pink landscapes. Her 2019 series “Flood Zone” — a nod to the unnervingly bureaucratic label that can often dictate life or death — is a surreal chronicle of an area decaying in real time. (snip)

The insidious, blink-and-you’ll-miss-it approach to her observational photography is intentional. Several years of capturing political extremism, gentrification and environmental disintegration has given Samoylova time to think about how to package disastrous messaging. “How do you communicate these very complex subjects and make them relatable?” she asks. “The trickiest part is to not make them off-putting.” Come for the pink sidewalks that characterize the streets of Miami — as many tourists do — and stay for the subsequent feelings of existential dread. It’s a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down, she says. “(Climate change) is stigmatized, and it’s become divisive, at least where I live in the US, especially in Florida. And who knows, it’s likely going to be erased from the conversation again.”

There’s so much cult doom in the article it’s hard to know where to begin. And end. Apparently, a gator hanging in the swamps is climate doom. And

See, concrete never eroded in a low lying state with lots of water, both fresh and salt, with high humidity, and lots of storms, before you drove a fossil fueled vehicle.

Read: Pink Is The Color Of Climate Doom Photography Or Something »

If All You See…

…are horrible fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on the Monday morning stimulus.

Read: If All You See… »

Trump Tells NBC News He Wants To End Birthright Citizenship For Illegals, Supports Push For Dreamers

This has made NBC News very upset and pushing partisanship in their article, failing to realize that the majority voted for Trump for this stuff, and, even many who didn’t vote Trump want illegals gone

Trump aims to end birthright citizenship, says American citizens with family here illegally may be deported

President-elect Donald Trump said in an interview with “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker that “you have no choice” but to deport everyone who is illegally in the U.S., including possibly removing the American citizen family members of those deported.

Trump also said he will move to end birthright citizenship — long enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution — which would strip rights from those born in the country to undocumented parents.

But, he said, he is open to working with Democrats to pass legislation that would ensure Dreamers — undocumented immigrants who entered the U.S. as children — would be able to remain in the country.

Can you end birthright citizenship for the children of illegals? You can find tons of articles which say yes and tons that say no. The 14th was meant to make those brought here as slaves, and their descendants, US citizens. Consider that children born to foreign diplomats: they will not gain US citizenship no matter where they are born on American soil. It goes to the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause in the 1st line of the 14th: are these children subject to the jurisdiction of the US or to the home countries of the illegals? Especially when they are conceived in a foreign country then come in with pregnant mama.

So, a case can be made to deny them citizenship. Could this be made retroactive, or, simply a case going forward? Also, how will this be monitored? That won’t be easy.

As for Dreamers: I don’t agree, but, I have a plan, as I wrote in 2017

Here’s a recommendation: Congress puts DACA into law, but allows 4 year renewals, rather than 2 years, in order to decrease burden on federal agencies. Just like with people who are applying for citizenship, any serious crimes can be cause to cancel an illegals legal status and deport them. And, yes, even DUIs may be considered cause, just like with those applying for citizenship. After 12 years, they can go through the same process as those applying for citizenship in order to attempt to earn full citizenship.

BUT, if we aren’t going to lay the “sins” of the parent(s) on the children, we are going to lay them on the parent(s). In order to obtain DACA status, the parent(s) must self deport, and provide proof at an immigration checkpoint as they leave. They are not allowed back in the United States for 2 years, and then only for a short visit. If they are caught residing in the U.S., or attempting to enter the country illegally, the children will have their DACA status ended and will be deported. After 12 years, they would be allowed to apply for temporary resident status, conditioned on speaking English and having good moral character. This seems fair. The parents broke our laws.

If you don’t agree with punishing the parents, then you’re simply using DACA to create a backdoor amnesty for all.

Rand Paul and Alex Padilla (D) introduced a plan in 2021. The beauty of a plan would be that this would cover Dreamers up to a point, and then it ends this completely. No more. You come in underage you get sent home.

Trump’s comments about his mass deportation plan, a key promise of his presidential campaign, were the most expansive since he won the election in November. The program, he said, will begin with undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes and then advance to “people outside of criminals.” He did not detail which crimes would be included.

“I think you have to do it,” Trump said of his deportation effort. “It’s a very tough thing to do. It’s — but you have to have, you know, you have rules, regulations, laws. They came in illegally. You know, the people that have been treated very unfairly are the people that have been on line for 10 years to come into the country.”

“We have to get the criminals out of our country,” Trump said, later adding: “But we’re starting with the criminals, and we got to do it. And then we’re starting with others, and we’re going to see how it goes.”

Yet, Democrats will caterwaul about removing gang members, rapists, and murderers because it could mean that other illegals get deported.

Read: Trump Tells NBC News He Wants To End Birthright Citizenship For Illegals, Supports Push For Dreamers »

Ice Free Arctic Doom Moved Out To 2027. Maybe 2030

There have been all sorts of prognostications of the Arctic being ice free, and none of them have come to fruition, yet, no one has been forced to apologize or been fired. Al Gore famously stated that it would be ice free in 2014.

An Ice-Free Arctic Could Come Before 2030, Study Finds

Ice loss in the Arctic has long been a sign of climate change, but an Arctic entirely free of ice has still seemed a long way off.

Not so, according to a recent study, which found that the Arctic could see its first ice-free day before the end of the decade.

The term “ice-free” is approximate since small patches of ice will cling to Greenland and the northern edges of Canada long after the rest of the Arctic has melted. Researchers measure the amount of frozen Arctic in “sea ice extent,” meaning areas with at least 15 percent of sea ice concentration. The Arctic is considered ice-free when there are less than one million square kilometers of sea ice.

It is hard to predict when exactly this will happen. Models consistently underestimate ice loss, and global weather patterns affect conditions at the Poles. But this most recent study found it could be as early as 2027.

Combining 11 different climate models, researchers Celine Heuze and Alexandra Jahn examined over 300 scenarios for the future of ice in the Arctic. Nearly one-tenth of them showed the first ice-free day occurring within the next 10 years, with the earliest prediction only a few years away. Even conservative models estimate the Arctic will be free of ice within 30 years.

Ah. So, they really do not know, they’re just guessing with their computer models, and, as usual, focus on their “worst case”. But, they give themselves an out with the 30 year prognostication. And if that doesn’t happen, no one will remember this one.

We can prevent this, though

According to researchers, the good news is that “if we could keep warming below the Paris Agreement target of 1.5 °C of global warming, ice-free days could potentially still be avoided.”

So, give up your money and freedom to government and we can “do something.”

Read: Ice Free Arctic Doom Moved Out To 2027. Maybe 2030 »

Pirate's Cove